Channel
@xiaoshiyilang888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
381subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003001001423 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaoshiyilang888 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaoshiyilang888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 381 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 370 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 363 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 363 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (9 January 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,900 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
20 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 95.0% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#出击报告 #上海 # 【修车老师】：陈梦琦 【修车时间】：26.7 【修车水费】：1500p（VIP+报告） 【凶器】：C～挺拔～ 【颜值】：人照8分 【身材】：165+细枝硕果 【软件】：成熟大姐姐，会聊 【缺点】：无 【推荐程度】：SSR/猛夯 【联系老师】：@chengmengqi 【过程描述】：真好有空，有缘约上了好多LY好评的梦琦老师。工作室在小区，看着挺安全。进门一看，成熟的御姐，挺好的。老师全程自然，简单攀谈，开始流程。 【前戏】LS先服务，技术很棒。三点刺激到位，特别是KL，技术一流。很润很爽。手口并用，口水和KJ液，混合涂抹在J8上，非常刺激。属于刺激性也正好，很舒服很润的那种。 换我反击，攻击三点很敏感，反驳很大。下面很容易湿。69舔鲍，反馈很好。感觉的出来很会，很享受。而且很喜欢吃鸡。 【正戏】被口的不行，戴T开干。下面很紧很润，属于第一梯队的名器。来回交锋，反馈很大。会让你用力加速，姿势也任意切换。如果…
❤1
#出击报告 #上海 # 【修车老师】：李小小 【修车时间】：26.7 【修车水费】：1300p 【凶器】：C～挺拔～乳晕略深稍大，性感 【颜值】：异域风情~人照9分 【身材】：160左右~细枝硕果~皮肤黄黑 【软件】：开始有点冷，进入状态还不错 【缺点】：床下情绪价值一般 【推荐程度】：SSR/猛夯 【联系老师】：@Xiaoxiao20s 【过程描述】：原本预期也不高，这次非常有缘分的一次CJ，当天抱着试试看的问，没想到时间和地址都很方便。临时决意CJ。进门没失望，小巧可人的辣妹，小Lisa的颜我还是很吃的。性格确实如有些报告所说，少点聊天技巧。 【前戏】妹妹先服务，技巧还行。该要的也都给。到了口的环节，开始感觉还不错。到后面加入舌头，不得了了…特别会戳我G点，被口的嗷嗷叫…还不带停，甚至感觉她有点得意…忍不住，我连忙阻止。停下来，还问我要不要？可以…床上魅魔是吧？那我不得反击一波？手口并用，小小确实敏感，水多。刺激G点反馈很好…
❤2
#出击报告 #上海 # 【修车老师】：肘子 【修车时间】：26.6 【修车水费】：1400p 【凶器】：C～挺拔～粉嫩 【颜值】：青春女大~纯天然~人照9分 【身材】：170左右~白嫩~大长腿~天然S身材 【软件】：同上次 【缺点】：同上次 【推荐程度】：同上次，UR/必夯 【联系老师】：@lx1122330 【过程描述】：二刷肘子了，见面依然那么青春可爱。进门搂着小聊了会，感觉妹妹，没上次那么生分和紧张了。还攀谈了起来。开始流程，我问她有没有啥新技术和花样？“哈哈哈~没有，还是这些呀。”服务的时候，感觉技术还是有明显长进的~床上依然还是青涩感，很耐心。很温柔，很舒服。有些涩的小要求还是不会，放的不够开（不过毕竟刚开，这个得慢慢成长）。SW随给随到，服务你的时候偶尔也会用大眼睛看你，非常勾人。可能是开累了，水少（以前也不是水多体质）。会用润滑液进入（能理解吧）。女上进步了不少，差点被被交代了~哈哈哈 切换了几个体位，感觉妹妹也进…
❤1
#出击报告 #上海 # 【修车老师】：肘子 【修车时间】：26.5 【修车水费】：1400p 【服务内容】：YYY KJ ML 【凶器】：C～挺拔～粉嫩 【颜值】：青春女大~纯天然~人照9分 【身材】：170左右~白嫩~大长腿~天然S身材 【软件】：让人上头的初恋女友感 【缺点】：刚下海会的不多，但在努力学，有可爱的稚嫩感 【推荐程度】：白月光~！UR/必夯 【联系老师】：@lx1122330 【过程描述】：最近超红的嫩妹，期待值很高。果然没失望。一开门，扑面而来的青春气息，妹妹颜值比上传的更可爱，果然青春气息还是要自己体会。进门不急着干活，聊聊天互相熟悉下，特别加分。还互相比了谁更白~哈哈哈，能和我差点不多白的妹妹真不多。毕竟见面交钱就干，太职业了。了解到妹妹也是生活所迫，做了很多心理建设才下的海，有点心疼。陪妹妹不紧不慢的玩了会，妹妹贴心的调好水温。开始YYY。看的出来刚学，但也挺认真的想服务好你，稚嫩的SZX，还挺舒服的。…
❤3
Channel name was changed to «萧十一郎»
Channel name was changed to «《认真的演员》»
Channel name was changed to «演员»
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «认真的雪»
#出击报告 #上海 # 【修车老师】：雪儿 【修车时间】：26.4 【修车水费】：1500p 【服务内容】：YYY KJ ML 【凶器】：C～皮肤滑～乳晕正常 【颜值】：青春御姐~人照10分 【身材】：170+大长腿+健身=模特身材 【软件】：温柔热情，女友感十足 【缺点】：无 【推荐程度】：UR/必夯 【联系老师】：@xueer_999 【过程描述】：雪儿是我第一次，复刷那么快的老师。可见我对她的偏爱。嘿嘿~熟悉的进门。女友一般都欢迎方式，雪儿是真懂男人。简单亲热，寒暄，就拉你去YYY。依旧那么温柔舒服。 【前戏】情趣选了丝袜+豹纹裙的搭配，大长腿配色丝袜是真的UPUPUP~! 色欲拉满~会用大长腿挑逗你~跟你玩闹。互相69口，互动依然那么温柔舒服。 我问她，这次能艹到你高潮，想尿吗？ 她害羞的说：不能了，因为开太多了，身体累了。（不演，不做作，这对个人还挺加分）行吧，那我努力！上次没用落地窗这次得用起来。后入起手！开档丝袜+…
❤1
#出击报告 #上海 # 【修车老师】：杰西 【修车时间】：26.3 【修车水费】：1500p 【服务内容】KJ ML 【凶器】：B+ 好看 【颜值】：夜店欧美辣妹 【身材】：健康辣妹身材 【软件】：嫩妹三件套 【缺点】：难约，I人？,开始有牛马味了（可能累了） 【推荐程度】：SR/快夯 【联系老师】：@Bsc_Jesse 【过程描述】：星光热门老师，鸽了2次，总算是约上了。进门豹纹辣妹打扮，虽然不是喜欢的类型（我也是来换口味的），但也确实好看吸引人。交水费，简单驱寒温暖，（感觉有点I和累）放水开干。 【前戏】嫩妹三件套，开始让我主动服务，其实感觉的出来妹子很疲惫。【正戏】CJS起手，中间还换了几个姿势，各种互动妹妹也配合。水和敏感度感觉是明显有下降的，毕竟已经开了好多天。能力理解吧~毕竟，课多，开的时间也长了。一番战斗后，感觉差点，最后折腾了一段时间，手打出货。（自己累+妹妹太累太I，个人挺看着情绪价值的) 【后戏】结束后，话匣…
❤2
#出击报告 #上海 # 【修车老师】：雪儿 【修车时间】：26.3 【修车水费】：1500p 【服务内容】：YYY KJ ML 【凶器】：C～胸型好看～ 【颜值】：青春御姐~人照10分 【身材】：170+大长腿+健身=模特身材 【软件】：温柔热情，女友感十足 【缺点】：无 【推荐程度】：UR/必夯 【联系老师】：@xueer_999 【过程描述】：雪儿让我简短评论就行，哈哈哈。那我就试着浓缩的说。 性格温柔，害羞，进门就用甜甜的小嘴欢迎你。脱衣直接让我哇塞~眼睛挪不开。 小骚女友性格，也会让你服务她，互相水乳交融，享受做爱，能互相爽到。 正戏中，身体匹配度高的像是磨合过的女友（目前我是CJ第一档的），互相能蹭到G点。配合健身的完美曲线，真定力不行就123了。雪儿会示意某个姿势很爽，我能深入她G点，让我不要停。最后在持续输出和下，一阵阵暖流喷出，并发出了啪啪的水声。雪儿害羞的说自己尿了，被操喷了。这哪里受得了？不久，自己也忍不住交…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @xiaoshiyilang888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 474,852 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“萧十一郎” (@xiaoshiyilang888), 381 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoshiyilang888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.