Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

姜姜本土高檔選妹區

@xiaomin565

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,070subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002188783000
TypeChannel
Username@xiaomin565
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiaomin565

Growth

4,0634,0724,067.57 August 2026 — 4,063 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,072 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,070 subscribers4,0707 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,062–4,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:184,070-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:504,072+9
7 Aug 2026, 04:314,063first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.91%
avg views ÷ 4,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
241
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.304%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held25 (31 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total6,018
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC2 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @linejiang68952Photo

這份信任來自一位潛水很久的哥哥🥳 謝謝關注姜姜的頻道 也感謝能給姜姜一份信任 #直接預約兩節 #優惠名額-6 ✍️✍️目前剩餘:9位 活動名額有限 先到先得唷 📢走過路過不要錯過 機不可失時不再來啦

8 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @linejiang68952Photo

哈哈 凌晨下班前姜姜還在接收預約單 一份來自新朋友的信任 謝謝啦 #優惠名額-5 ✍️✍️目前剩餘:10位 活動名額有限 先到先得唷 📢走過路過不要錯過 機不可失時不再來啦

7 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

姜姜溫馨提示💓💓 1-活動截止時間到本月16號 2-可提前進行預約名額(但禁止取消) 3-如果一旦取消或沒消費成功 名額預留期即將結束 (相當於空出來一位名額 大家都可以爭搶 先約先得唷) 4-如果名額送完 時間還沒有到的話 這種也算活動結束 除非有空出來的名額喔 📌📌📌 所以姜姜建議 大家卡緊時間進行預約喔 搶佔先機 嘿嘿 姜姜Gleezy: jntw88 姜姜TG: https://t.me/jiang2238

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC308 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📢馬年大吉➖高檔區 娜然 168cm.D奶.49kg.25歲 氣質御姐第一天下海 大長腿很吸精 皮膚白皙 無刺青 確定不來嘗鮮嗎 🚩點擊:隱密聊 📱點擊:私密TG 🐰瞭解姜妞: 姜姜心情 🐰影片區域: 濕濕頻道 🐰學生妹區: 學生妹區域 🐰高檔妹區: 高檔妹區域 🐰隱密頻道: 選妃總頻道 🐰熟女專區: 韻味熟女區 🐰恩客評價: 真實售後區 🐰更多正妹: 觀看更多區 📍本茶莊特色:專做回頭客 🌐以防走丟官方:點擊觀看 ⏰營業時間早上10:00-凌晨1:00

7 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC122 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

哈哈哈 看到姜姜發佈的福利心動到不行 原本說只能17號的 但還是排除萬難改約16號惹💓 #優惠名額-4 ✍️✍️目前剩餘:11位 活動名額有限 先到先得唷 📢走過路過不要錯過 機不可失時不再來啦

7 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#優惠名額-3 ✍️✍️目前剩餘:12位 活動名額有限 先到先得唷 📢走過路過不要錯過 機不可失時不再來啦 #來自新朋友的大力支持唷

7 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#優惠名額-2 ✍️✍️目前剩餘:13位 活動名額有限 先到先得唷 📢走過路過不要錯過 機不可失時不再來啦

7 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC96 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#優惠名額-1 ✍️✍️目前剩餘:14位 活動名額有限 先到先得唷 📢走過路過不要錯過 機不可失時不再來啦

7 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026

姜姜茶莊月初限時超狂大活動 📢📢📢限時衝刺・送完為止 買一節送一節 買兩節送兩節 免費無套2次 立減500-1000現金券 高中生半價試車 (滿18歲) 高檔尤物半價體驗 花季少女破處一次 雙飛買一送一 約妹妹永久半價 送絲襪體驗一次 現金優惠劵6000 約多少送多少(標準:消費兩節) 送正妹原味內褲 免房費5次 免費送一節卡 3+1送3+1卡一次 三個月8折卡 高價妹本人照選妃 一年免費贈送一節卡(標準:消費兩節) 免費性愛趴入場劵(標準:包夜8h) ✍️✍️✍️ ①約一節選擇兩個福利 ②約兩節選擇四個福利 ③約三節選擇六個福利 ④包夜8H贈送全部福利 ❗️❗️優惠名額限制:15位 ❗️❗️性愛趴入場劵: 2位 PS:活動期限8/6號—8月16號 姜姜Gleezy: jntw88 姜姜TG: https://t.me/jiang2238

6 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC111 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @linejiang68952Photo

#感謝新朋友的信任🪄🪄

6 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC107 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @linejiang68952Photo

因為不踩雷 所以才會一直找姜姜 嘿嘿 #專做回頭客✍️✍️

5 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC335 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

私密姜姜一對一隱秘聊天區 https://gleezy.net/jntw88

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @xiaomin565. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 23,849 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“姜姜本土高檔選妹區” (@xiaomin565), 4,070 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaomin565.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.