Channel
@xiaomin5588
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,748subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001815526689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaomin5588 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaomin5588 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 2,748 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 2,751 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 2,754 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 2,755 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (9 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 735 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
姜姜茶莊月初限時超狂大活動 📢📢📢限時衝刺・送完為止 買一節送一節 買兩節送兩節 免費無套2次 立減500-1000現金券 高中生半價試車 （滿18歲） 高檔尤物半價體驗 花季少女破處一次 雙飛買一送一 約妹妹永久半價 送絲襪體驗一次 現金優惠劵6000 約多少送多少（標準：消費兩節） 送正妹原味內褲 免房費5次 免費送一節卡 3+1送3+1卡一次 三個月8折卡 高價妹本人照選妃 一年免費贈送一節卡（標準：消費兩節） 免費性愛趴入場劵（標準：包夜8h） ✍️✍️✍️ ①約一節選擇兩個福利 ②約兩節選擇四個福利 ③約三節選擇六個福利 ④包夜8H贈送全部福利 ❗️❗️優惠名額限制：15位 ❗️❗️性愛趴入場劵： 2位 PS：活動期限8/6號—8月16號 姜姜Gleezy： jntw88 姜姜TG： https://t.me/jiang2238
茶莊千千萬 但不是所有的茶莊都可以成為你的心頭好~ 🇹🇼姜姜的四從四不守則✍️✍️ 1️⃣姜姜從不吹牛 2️⃣從不誇大 3️⃣從不欺騙 4️⃣從不敷衍 歡迎加入姜姜頻道隨時諮詢！ 💓姜姜聯絡line： jntw88 💓姜姜Gleezy聯絡： jntw88 💓隱秘聯絡姜姜： https://gleezy.net/jntw88 🚘姜姜聯絡telegram：https://t.me/jiang2238 觀察區 ⭐高檔妹妹專區：https://t.me/xiaomin565 🌷性愛學生妹專屬區： https://t.me/ye0223 💃瞭解姜姜日常區: https://t.me/lineht98627 🌈韻味氣質熟女專區： https://t.me/linmuyao1 🔔觀察客人評價區： https://t.me/wenqi1992369 💫姜姜總類型大全： https://t.me/linejiang689…
很多沒配合過的哥哥說不清楚配合流程 姜姜聽勸 製作了一張新手流程 簡單清晰明了 期待跟各位哥哥的相遇唷 🐰姜姜TG： @jiang2238 🐰姜姜Gleezy：點擊即可
有誠意的哥哥都已經開始享受生活惹 北部20k的AV女優四小時已開始 嘿嘿🍑🍑
很多哥哥都很好奇 為什麼很少看到姜姜在頻道裡抱怨 或是每天喊著業績不好、求大家救救我 其實，不是沒有 很多茶姐遇到的事情，姜姜幾乎也都遇過 遇過說好要約，最後卻消失的客人 遇過被放鳥、被晃點，最後自己還要賠錢、被扣錢 遇過真心對待，卻被欺騙 也遇過月底業績壓力大到睡不好，每天睜開眼就在想：「這個月到底該怎麼辦？」 這些，我都有經歷過 只是後來我慢慢發現 如果每天都在抱怨、每天都在喊苦、每天都在拜託大家來支持 那能改變什麼嗎？ 答案好像沒有 因為哥哥們的選擇很多 茶莊很多，介紹人也很多 所以我每天都在想一件事 為什麼大家要選擇姜姜？ 我沒有最厲害的話術 也沒有最浮誇的宣傳 我能做的，就是把每一次安排做好，把每一位妹妹把關好，把每一位哥哥的需求認真放在心上 因為我一直相信 只有哥哥玩得開心、願意再回來找我 姜姜才能一步一步把自己的路走穩 說到底，我努力工作，不是因為我有多愛錢 而是因為我想讓生活過得更好 我想讓媽媽過得輕鬆一點 想把…
如果有同樣出現這種情況的哥哥請注意~ TG聯絡不上姜姜 可以聯絡以下賬號 1-LINE：jntw88 2-LINE： 632ee 3-Gleezy： https://gleezy.net/jntw88 （點擊即可）
姜姜的心裡話🪄 我最常聽到的一句話是：「30歲了，為什麼還開10-20k？而且胸部也不大，為什麼還這麼貴？是鑲金的嘛」 但我通常會反問各位哥哥：如果一個人只有年紀小、胸部大，卻沒有身材外貌、氣質、皮膚狀態、談吐或整體服務感覺的加分，你真的會願意為價位低而買單嗎？ 答案其實很明顯。 年齡不是定義價值的唯一標準，胸部大小也不是。真正影響評價的，是一個人的整體條件：外貌、身材比例、氣質、皮膚狀態、互動感、服務感受與整體或職業吸引力。 所以不要只用「年齡」或「胸部大小」去判斷一個人的價位，因為市場看的是綜合素質，而不是單一條件唷
❤2
本月姜姜來點現實的 哈哈 只要哥哥們敢消費 姜姜就敢送~ 福利有使用期限 但優惠劵沒有 可終身使用唷 🚩Gleezy聊 ：隱密聊 📱Telegram：私密TG 🐰瞭解姜妞： 姜姜心情 🐰影片區域： 濕濕頻道 🐰學生妹區： 學生妹區域 🐰高檔妹區： 高檔妹區域 🐰隱密頻道： 選妃總頻道 🐰熟女專區： 韻味熟女區 🐰恩客評價： 真實售後區 🐰更多正妹： 觀看更多區 📍本茶莊特色：專做回頭客 🌐以防走丟官方：點擊觀看 ⏰營業時間早上10：00-凌晨1：00
注意！！注意！！！📢📢 最近發現詐騙集團開始盜用複製跟外送茶一樣的名稱以及作業模式進行新型的詐騙 會要求你們先轉U說是預約金 提前預約妹妹 這種屬於詐騙 大家一定不要相信 我們正規本土外送茶都是客人開好房間 見到妹妹人之後滿意在事先現金交易的 不會讓你們提前轉賬 進行預約 就算要加紅牌預約費 也是每節+200台幣 而且也是包含在你當面給妹妹的費用內 絶對不會讓你們提前支付 只要讓你們提前轉賬支付的假外送茶都是新型的詐騙集團 認準姜姜本號 謹防被詐騙唷 姜姜 TG： @jiang2238
孕味十足的短髮萌系媽媽有人喜歡嗎 https://x.com/mosababdo04/status/2070019604030853628?s=20
後續來惹~~ 台北沐沐客評💓 妹妹身高：小隻馬（158cm 妹妹體重：完美（44kg 妹妹胸部：軟軟的超好抓（C 妹妹年齡：22 服務加分點：身材一級棒 是否有刺青/抽菸：無 是否值得回約：值得 對茶姐姜姜的評價：碰到我很有耐心 活動優惠價：8000一小時一次 總結：信姜姜真的可以得到性福~約完之後還想約 嘿嘿🤭
其實這位哥哥是在四月的時候加到姜姜的。 剛開始，他跟很多第一次認識我的哥哥一樣，心裡充滿了防備。 他跟我說，自己以前被點數轉賬詐騙過，也聽過很多仙人跳的故事，所以每一次想踏出那一步，心裡都會一直拉扯。 想放鬆，但又怕再次受傷。 想相信，但又怕自己的信任被辜負。 所以這兩個月來，他偶爾會來問我妹妹的資訊、想詢問一些細節，但也都是輕輕試水的詢問 但姜姜從來沒有覺得煩。 因為我知道，當一個人曾經被傷害過，要再次鼓起勇氣相信一個陌生人，真的需要很大的勇氣。 而且， 也不是所有的人加了之後馬上就會消費 ，都是需要潛水去觀察或者是安排自己方便的時間。 很多人會說：「問那麼久還不消費，是不是浪費時間？」 但我的想法不一樣。 我做的從來不是一次性的生意。 如果只是想騙一次，那我根本沒有必要花時間，陪你聊天、回答你的問題、消除你的不安。 我更希望的是，今天你願意給姜姜一次機會，下一次、下下次，當你想到放鬆的時候，第一個想到的是：「找姜姜，我放心。…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @xiaomin5588. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 532,171 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“知音選妃總區頻道🐠🐠” (@xiaomin5588), 2,748 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaomin5588.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.