Channel
@xiaolubaogao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003792641901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaolubaogao |
| Created | 6 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaolubaogao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 07:22 | 2 | no change |
| 9 Oct 2026, 06:47 | 2 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 6 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (6 October 2026 – 7 October 2026) |
| Views total | 270 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
写报告拿积分⭐抽大奖获取 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱，出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点，请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】：9_某天 【验证人ID】：烂漫不夜城 【老师艺名】：芒果 【客服账号】：@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】：厦门湖里 【茶费次数】:7 【人照相似】：95 【目测年龄】：18 【颜值妆造】：90 【身材曲线】：85 【乳房状态】：A 【臀部形态】：大有肉 【皮肤状态】：黄 【bb的状态】：毛少，小蝴蝶 【服务评分】：85 【情绪价值】：90 人照无差，高个嫩妹90斤，挺会聊天的，性格开朗，会找话题，有蛇有69，蛇到饱，有陪洗，正常黄皮，妹子说一个人洗两次'澡，都要脱皮了，有漱口水，妹子还是比较注重卫生的，口起来很舒服没有齿感，前男友调教的好，蛇饱后考试舔逼，很敏感，水蛇腰一直扭，嘴里哼个不停，腿还会夹我的头，嫩妹就是好，反馈很真实，很享受舔逼，带套开工，叫的更大声了，很紧，各种姿势都配合，爽了还会喊爸爸…
写报告拿积分⭐抽大奖获取 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱，出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点，请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】：10.6 【出击人ID】：jimsimth 【老师艺名】：小鹿 【客服账号】：@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】：厦门 【茶费次数】：7 【人照相似】：90（满分100） 【目测年龄】：18 【颜值妆造】：90（满分100） 【身材曲线】：95（满分100） 【乳房状态】：B很软很舒服（大小/真假） 【臀部形态】：小巧有型（小巧/大翘） 【皮肤状态】：皮肤很光滑，正常肤色，没有很白（肤色/质感） 【bb的状态】：嫩，紧（户型/紧湿度） 【服务评分】：95（满分100） 【情绪价值】：90（满分100） 【日☀后感/详细描述】：今天看到泡面哥上新了，犹豫了一会决定出击小鹿，妹子人照相符，看着还挺可爱。妹子喜欢笑，很听话。洗的过程中也可以🐍，还会贴心询问需不需要摘舌钉，很配合。胸不大，但是很软，摸起来很舒…
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @xiaolubaogao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@xiaolubaogao named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小鹿报告” (@xiaolubaogao), 2 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaolubaogao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.