Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

会员交易反馈

@xiaoluVIPfk77

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004461849354
TypeChannel
Username@xiaoluVIPfk77
Description【小鹿包养】VIP老板反馈交易频道假一赔十 唯一客服:@xiaoluby666 选妃频道:@xiaoluxf111 中转频道:@xiaoluZzz1 (新手必看) 反馈频道:@xiaoluVIPfk77 双向客服:@xiaolubysx_bot 搜索机器人;@xiaoluby_bot 主动私聊的都是骗子!!! 全网在押 可走担保 放心交易
Created6 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/xiaoluVIPfk77

Growth

76 August 2026 — 7 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–8 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:317no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:187first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1052.4%
avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.7
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held12 (6 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total442
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC20 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

小鹿.今日喜报 今日【成交+1】! 🤝恭喜客户成功牵手契合伴侣,费用结清,全套服务圆满收官 😀我们始终恪守服务底线: ✅真实资源 ✅精准一对一匹配 ✅见面不满意可退介绍费 ✅全程售后保障 以专业不负托付,以诚信相守相伴 愿下一段圆满姻缘,在小鹿与你相遇🧸

25 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC120 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

小鹿.今日喜报 今日【成交+1】! 🤝恭喜客户成功牵手契合伴侣,费用结清,全套服务圆满收官 😀我们始终恪守服务底线: ✅真实资源 ✅精准一对一匹配 ✅见面不满意可退介绍费 ✅全程售后保障 以专业不负托付,以诚信相守相伴 愿下一段圆满姻缘,在小鹿与你相遇🧸

25 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC112 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

小鹿.今日喜报 今日【成交+1】! 🤝恭喜客户成功牵手契合伴侣,费用结清,全套服务圆满收官 😀我们始终恪守服务底线: ✅真实资源 ✅精准一对一匹配 ✅见面不满意可退介绍费 ✅全程售后保障 以专业不负托付,以诚信相守相伴 愿下一段圆满姻缘,在小鹿与你相遇🧸

17 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTCviews —

会员交易反馈 pinned «💎新手交易流程 请耐心看完 小鹿给大家介绍一下常见问题 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 1.点击此处查看视频验证 2.点击此处查看大概保养流程 3.点击此处整体见面满意或者不满意 4.点击此处整体讲解会员的好处 5.点击购买usdt交易所币安流程 6.点击查看薄养所有整体问题 7.点击此处历史交易下单反馈 8.点击导航全部资源进入频道 9.点击进入公开聊天群大家可以交流 💯新手玩包养必看流程 一定要看»

17 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC82 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xiaoluZzz1

💎新手交易流程 请耐心看完 小鹿给大家介绍一下常见问题 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 1.点击此处查看视频验证 2.点击此处查看大概保养流程 3.点击此处整体见面满意或者不满意 4.点击此处整体讲解会员的好处 5.点击购买usdt交易所币安流程 6.点击查看薄养所有整体问题 7.点击此处历史交易下单反馈 8.点击导航全部资源进入频道 9.点击进入公开聊天群大家可以交流 💯新手玩包养必看流程 一定要看

17 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC77 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xiaoluxf111Photo

🛡 【小鹿】新客入场·快速通关指南 第一步:入会 🌟 一星 · 沐辰会员 | 储值 588/88U 588元抵扣888元会员准入费 首单全场消费8折 解锁全频道验证视频、积分兑换 、抽奖活动 初次到店优选体验档位 🌙 二星 · 观云会员 | 储值 1666U 通享沐辰会员全部权益 前二单消费享7折直接抵扣 第三次到店自动解锁全场6折 附赠好友券一张(携好友下单赠送6折卷一张可直接使用)、优先预约、会员福利 👑 三星 · 御境会员 | 储值 2188U 门店顶级会员,包揽下级所有权益 本人前三单保养免费 用完即享全场终身6折(永久有效) 专属预留、专属接待、生日定制礼遇、优先排期预约、 公群顶级身份全程定制服务。 📋 会员通用规则 1. 高阶会员自动继承低等级全部权益,开卡即刻生效 2. 账户余额长期有效,不与临时活动叠加使用 第二步:费用结算 总费用 = 平台介绍费 + 妹子生活费。 介绍费:原价 6888—首次

17 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC31 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xiaoluxf111

【小鹿】选妃频道 全部资源

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @xiaoluVIPfk77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 135,656 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“会员交易反馈” (@xiaoluVIPfk77), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoluVIPfk77.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.