Channel
@xiaolegaoGod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
92subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002154260509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaolegaoGod |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaolegaoGod |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 92 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 93 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 93 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2025 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Nekogram 开发者承认手机号被发送至 Bot，但否认存在存储行为 Nekogram 开发者公开回应称，用户号码确实曾被发送到指定 Bot，但坚称这些数据“没有被存储，也没有与任何人共享”。同时，开发者还放出了相关组件源码 Extra.java，试图说明其实现逻辑。 不过，外界对比公开源码与 APK 实际编译版本中的混淆代码后发现，两者并不完全一致。分析指出，公开的 Extra.java 虽然确认了号码同步到 Bot 的流程，但删除了实际构建版本中疑似用于解析和回传手机号的相关逻辑。也就是说，开发者公开的代码更像是一个“清理过”的版本，无法完整对应已发布程序中的真实行为。
👍1
“尊严只在剑锋之上，真理只在大炮射程之内。” ——艾跃进 这句话背后，是一种典型的社会达尔文主义世界观。持有这种观念的人，通常有以下四种思维特征，值得我们警惕和反思： 第一：思想必须统一，立场永远先行。 他们认为思想可以、也必须统一。因此，任何讨论都不是为了寻求理解，而是为了划分敌我。 第二：异见即是威胁，多样性无法容纳。 他们的认知结构单一，无法容纳多样性。任何不同的意见都会被直接定义为“威胁”，因此排斥、孤立甚至清除异见者，都变得理所当然。 第三：力量压倒论证，真理全靠实力。 他们相信“真理只在射程范围内”，确立真理的方式是展示力量，而非逻辑论证。在他们的世界里，成王败寇，实力至上。理性是软弱的，谈判是拖延的，解释是无力的。 第四：人是“人力资源”，价值在于服从。 他们不把人看作拥有独立判断和感受的主体，而是看作可以被随意塑造、组织和排列的“资源”。一个人的价值，不取决于他是否会思考，而取决于他是否“忠诚”和“听…
#xray #gfw #墙
https://pzurl.cn/jDw2Oc
👍1
#机场 #af https://gocn.dg6.top:8443/#/register?code=nyVZperc
Video, posted without a caption
令中国感到恐惧的一个新闻热词 Illustration by Kristie Bailey/The New York Times 中国市场的竞争激烈程度往往远超美国。美国的汽车制造商数量屈指可数，而中国有100多家电动汽车制造商在拼命争夺市场份额。中国的太阳能组件制造商数量之多，以至于产量高出全球需求的50%。大约100家中国锂电池制造商生产的电池总量高出全球需求的25%。 虽然这迫使中国的制造商们创新，但也导致了价格战、亏损和坏账，这正逐渐演变为严峻问题。 中国正在走向通货紧缩，这种价格螺旋式下降的问题往往带来灾难性后果，曾在20世纪90年代导致日本经济陷入长期低迷。中国的领导人将这个问题归咎于所谓“内卷”，也就是无序的国内竞争。他们试图通过行政手段迫使企业维持价格稳定，并指示地方政府削减补贴来遏制这种现象。 这些措施难以从根本上解决问题。它们充其量只是对中国更深层问题的临时补救措施。中国的经济增长严重依赖投资，而…
❤1👍1
#机场 https://inv.dginv.click/#/register?code=nyVZperc
华为鲲鹏930 芯片分析报告解析 文案：Kurnal 视频制作：ruikonn@ruikonn 配音：还是Kurnal
该视频已被国内平台下架
Video, posted without a caption
https://github.com/HW-whistleblower/True-Story-of-Pangu?tab=readme-ov-file
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @xiaolegaoGod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“写尽千山 |落笔皆是你” (@xiaolegaoGod), 92 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaolegaoGod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.