Channel
@xiaofanqie131
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,896subscribers
+5,281 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003881897433 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaofanqie131 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 19 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaofanqie131 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 5,896 | -67 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 5,963 | +5,348 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 615 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:47 | 615 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 July 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 521 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 上城区小番茄的宠粉福利 🎁 奖品清单 • 白嫖P × 1 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 杭州学生会 • 加入 杭州学生会新人老师 • 加入 小番茄🍅的小屋🏡 • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗：5积分 • 祝福上限：无限次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号，提高中奖率 • 幸运值祝福：支持 幸运值说明 ⌛ 开奖时间 • 2026-09-12 23:00:00 📜 抽奖说明 本次活动由 #小番茄 @xiaofanqie1112 独家赞助 ✨ 愿好运伴随每一位参与者，祝大家好运！
杭州学生会：https://t.me/students_union 评分标准：6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】：#小番茄@xiaofanqie1112 【出击留名】：Paris 【出击时间】：8月22日 【大概位置】：绍兴袍江 【修车水费】：3600夜 【高端服务】：有的打 ✅ 没有的打 ❎ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 六九 ✅ ③ 毒龙 ❎ 【人照相似】：人照9分，比照片上要嫩很多，皮肤白到发光，满满的胶原蛋白，妹妹来的时候穿的衣品不错，露脐紧身牛仔元气满满，嫩妹优势拉满 【身高身材】：162左右，右手花臂，完全没有小肚子 【胸器罩杯】：实测B左右，绵软Q弹，毕竟嫩妹，葡萄小巧坚挺，还是可爱的粉红色，比较敏感，年轻就是好，皮肤摸上去真的像是绸缎一样潮出水， 【湿度紧度】：应该有修剪过，照顾视觉的同时又不会影响品尝，干净无味，蝴蝶外形既保证充足湿度的同时又能兼顾口感，时时刻刻能感觉到…
27号也就是明日下午可以接点课哟
今天开课。有惊喜哟😘😘😘
16号🉑滴滴
明天开课
姨妈休完了可以开课哟
小番茄🍅的小屋🏡 pinned a photo
💐💐💐开奖了💐💐💐 上城嫩妹小番茄的日常福利 @xiaofanqie1112 开奖了! 本期总参与人数: 8256 1- 林总 (翻倍1) 获得:半价券(限P) 2- 下次再相遇 (翻倍1) 获得:200元优惠券 3- 不敌 (翻倍1) 获得:200元优惠券 4- 卡珊德拉气象因我变晴 (翻倍1) 获得:200元优惠券 5- 格拉默 (翻倍1) 获得:200元优惠券 6- 失蹤人口 (翻倍1) 获得:200元优惠券 7- 一介布衣 (翻倍1) 获得:52元口令红包 谨祝中奖用户大吉大利万事顺意
❤1
小番茄🍅的小屋🏡 pinned a photo
🎰 上城嫩妹小番茄的日常福利 @xiaofanqie1112 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-杭州半岛嫩妹会 🎫 加入-杭州半岛新人工兵频道 🎫 加入-小番茄🍅的小屋🏡 🍀 每1分中奖几率加1倍 ⤷在群中输入「喜+1」 🎁 奖品内容: 半价券(限P) × 1 200元优惠券 × 5 52元口令红包 × 1 💡 活动说明: 上城嫩妹小番茄的日常福利！ 本活动由小番茄 @xiaofanqie1112 独家赞助！ 开奖后5日内有效！ 转赠需老师同意！ 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月07日 20时00分00秒
刚刚开课就没人看我的小屋吗？
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xiaofanqie131. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小番茄🍅的小屋🏡” (@xiaofanqie131), 5,896 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaofanqie131.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.