Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

西安上门洗浴会所资源频道更新

@xianvipever

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

341subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003994503543
TypeChannel
Username@xianvipever
Description西安多年娱乐向导:小老鼠/清酒(老号被同行恶意投诉认准新频道) 全城娱乐洗浴会所上门资源每日推荐频道不充值不办卡无强制消费无套路 联系客服 @xiansvip 双向限制机器人 @xiansvip_bot
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/xianvipever

Growth

341342341.57 Aug 2026, 09:16 — 342 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:03 — 341 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:02 — 341 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:168 Aug 2026, 07:02
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 341–342 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:02341no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:03341-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:16342first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.1%
avg views ÷ 341 subscribers
Avg views / post
150
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.943%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,105
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
250
Videos
13
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC66 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

1️⃣周六外卖排班出勤更新(最近晚上20:00后不建议进店)雁塔区特别注意!#西安 #上门 #洗浴 #会所 8月8号好运排班出勤 8月8号后宫排班出勤 8月8号洋酒排班出勤 8月8号迪士尼排班出勤 8月8号星巴克排班出勤 8月8号莫妮卡排班出勤 8月8号芭芭拉排班出勤 8月8号无忧传媒排班出勤 8月8号全城初恋排班出勤 祝各位周末愉快,客反好评拖延更新,特殊时期望理解! 👤预约联系客服(工作时间中午13:00-凌晨3:00) 🤖双向限制机器(如遇客服消息无法发送点击) 因不可抗力因素近期95 98洗浴会所联系客服推荐(夜间不推荐进店)南郊不推荐进店(不分商k也会面临夜间清场)

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC89 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💋西安外卖上门潮喷类型:馨妃(高颜69舌吻潮喷)新款#西安 #上门 #外卖 #潮喷 #馨妃 #后宫 -00年 172cmDcupsos绝对真胸手感超棒超软- . Pure and lovely- ·上有天堂,下有苏杭(苏州)美的有底气 2. 69舌吻 可CP(潮喷 C2.身材气质俱佳温柔可人优雅知性 2.纯素人西安首开配合度极高易调教C2.皮肤雪白光滑细腻身材三围比例完美2.丰臀肥乳热情主动风骚性感菜 C2.洋气御姐范穿搭大牌清瘦气质脱俗2.不接酗酒,醉酒,只接素质客 A4腰·纤长细腿·娇喘勾魂紧致多十十絕頂蜜桃臀薄肌緊緻身材轩轩豐臀巨乳性感尤物翹臀美杀 👤预约联系客服(工作时间中午13:00-凌晨3:00) 🤖双向限制机器(如遇客服消息无法发送点击) 🫀资源发布频道(不同类型会所外卖商K集合) 多年西安娱乐经理不套路不充值不办卡真诚营销有需请私

6 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC134 viewsread 8 August 2026

⚠️注意风险还在,风还未平! 老客户进店切记20:00前离店 商K注意随时清场!

4 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC197 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @xianppcPhoto

💋西安会所莲湖区西门西关正街【宇香spa】#西安 #会所 #西关正街 #莲湖区 #宇香 #城内 #丝足口 #西门 项目一:半裸 助洗 口一次 890 70分钟 项目二:全裸 陪洗 口两次990 80分钟 项目三:全裸 陪洗 口两次1090 80分 钟(情景 油墨 水床 艳舞 5M五选一) 项目四:双飞80分钟不限次 1650 免费丝袜免费饮品 小果盘:再来个妹子两个妹子一起(可做一次陪20分钟)300自选非必备 不充值不办卡无强制消费无套路 (进店选人看上玩·看不上直接走) 服务当中有任何不满意,店内投诉后联系客服经理处理,切记一定不要离店,离店投诉概不处理! 👤预约联系客服(工作时间中午13:00-凌晨3:00) 🤖双向限制机器(如遇客服消息无法发送点击) 🫀资源发布频道(不同类型会所外卖商K集合) 多年西安娱乐经理不套路不充值不办卡真诚营销有需请私

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @xianvipever. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 94,494 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“西安上门洗浴会所资源频道更新” (@xianvipever), 341 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xianvipever.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.