江湖中文官方发布 pinned a video

Channel
江湖中文官方发布
@xiake
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
185subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002487648699 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @xiake @zhongwenbao |
| Description | 本频道为江湖极客部指定的中文包维护与更新的频道,以及收录网络上完整度90%以上的中文包。 🌐 设定语言方法:只需点击中文所需链接并确定,便可以更新界面语言;将来有新英文界面会自动更新,不用手动更新。 投诉及建议,可联系 @iBaoBot 江湖极客部 @JiKeBu |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiake |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 185 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 185 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 184 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 251.4%
- avg views ÷ 185 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 465
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 June 2026 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 465 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 38.5% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 🙂 全网广告费每月投入500万u 包出款! 🙂 东南亚上押500万u全网上押5000万U 🙂 煮酒论英雄 广告论实力 资金储备5亿U 😵💫2026美加墨世界杯 官方指定投注平台 全网最强福利 万众瞩目 最高返利75% 😁【贵宾会】 强势启航 集团背书 信誉担保 全网首发 引爆彩票娱乐新纪元!六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 全民代理全民收单 助您白手起家 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 官网 750.cc ✨超高爆率,大额爆奖喜讯 包出款😦 🥇尊贵VIP【da***】盈利提款 468万U 🥈尊贵VIP【qq***】盈利提款398万U 🥉尊贵VIP【aa***】盈利提款 303万U 🙂尊贵VIP【ni***】 盈利提款 277万U 🙂尊贵VIP【niubi*】盈利提款 239万U 🙂尊贵VIP【KH***】 盈利提款 199万U 🙂尊贵VIP【uu***】盈利提款 160.3万U …
再次提醒各位,电报市面上做病毒的人一直抄袭,搬运,仿冒我们的频道,再添加病毒进去盗你们的号,或者其它有害的诈骗行为。你们一定要明白,小白不懂的你不要直接搜索,你要在对话框输入 @xiake @zhongwenbao 发送在任何对话后,点击你发送的进入,这样的方式点击进去,才不会错。用户名完全吻合 zhongwenbao 才是江湖的频道,其它的全部是病毒频道!!!!! 由于网络上仿冒/抄袭/诱导至病毒的频道很多,为了便于大家区分本频道,我们花费重金从电报官方购买链接/用户名: 侠客 @xiake (本频道) 中文包 @zhongwenbao (本频道) 汉语部 @hanyubu (..) 汉化部 @hanhuabu (..) 语言部 @yuyanbu (..) 中文部 @zhongwenbu (交流群) (全拼,好记,不迷路) 在任何的对话发以上用户名,点击可直达江湖中文系列。 图中明显的 .exe 是电脑执行文件,中文包…
❤2👌1👍1🔥1
公告: 我们并未开设除本频道外的任何频道,请注意安全‼️ 谨防被仿冒频道利用,去点击病毒,导致的损失自行负责‼️ 唯一发布频道 @ZhongWenBao 简短易记 @XiaKe (侠客 全拼) ═━━═━━═ ★ ═━━═━━═ 📌 点我查看频道主目录
❤2
#版本介绍 【江湖语言包】对删号账户的区分显示为:【已删号🚫】,更多关于删除电报账号详情,请点击 江湖宝库 进行了解。 ═━━═━━═ ★ ═━━═━━═ 📌 点我查看频道主目录
👍2
94
93
92
91
90
89
88
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @xiake. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 135,976 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@shequbu · 14612 posts江湖行业部
@hangyebu · 8,1877 posts江湖社交部
@shejiaobu · 2756 posts江湖传媒部
@chuanmeibu · 9,9585 posts爱酱导航
@ijiang · 7382 posts江湖极客部
@jikebu · 2432 posts行业部官员 · 笔记
@sucaibu · 3102 posts江湖宝库
@baoku · 3,8101 post供应部 @GongYingBu
@gongyingbu · 9651 post纪梵希
@JFX_000 · 251 post江湖官方公告
@jianghu · 1,5411 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@xiake named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“江湖中文官方发布” (@xiake), 185 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiake.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.