2023年4月1日发生在陕西西咸新区资村的一起因非法强拆引发的刑事案件,其全过程及后续发展如下: 事件背景 因当地开发文旅项目,张恒家房屋被纳入征收范围,但因补偿协议未谈拢,张家始终未签字同意拆迁。此前征收方两次作出的“责令交出土地决定”均被法院判决撤销,第三次决定当时仍在申辩期内,尚未获得法院强制执行许可。 强拆与冲突经过 2023年4月1日清晨6时许,数十名人员驾驶轮式破碎机、手持防爆盾、防暴叉等器械,强行破坏张家院门和房门后闯入,试图控制并架走张恒父子。面对持械人员的非法入侵,张恒父子持自制长矛在屋内对峙反抗。冲突中,张恒持长矛捅刺强拆人员石某,致其胸腹腰部多处刺伤,当场死亡。 后续处理与判决 案发次日,张恒父子因涉嫌故意伤害罪被刑事拘留。 2025年1月21日,法院已认定此次强拆为非法行为,10名参与人员因故意毁坏财物罪被判处缓刑至二年有期徒刑,并赔偿张家1960元。 2026年8月7日,咸阳市秦都区人民法院对张恒案一审…

Channel
香港28吃瓜
@xgcg888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
323subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003034279826 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xgcg888 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xgcg888 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 323 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 320 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 320 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.41%
- avg views ÷ 323 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7.8
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 101 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 45s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
也门胡塞武装大规模打击亲沙特武装多处雇佣兵集结点
第一视角观看,也门胡塞武装击退沙特雇佣兵
广州白云机场上演离谱接机现场,大批粉丝把艺人层层围堵,路人隔着人群完全分辨不出明星是谁,拥挤混乱的场面,已经严重影响到过往旅客正常通行,艺人助理无奈只能出面驱赶围观人群维持秩序。 让人百思不得其解的是,整场接机活动放眼望去全是年轻女生,全程看不到一位男性粉丝,这种粉丝性别高度集中的现象,也成了饭圈接机很普遍的现状。机场属于公共交通枢纽,扎堆围堵、无序追星,本质上已经扰乱公共秩序,追星一定要守住边界,不能占用公共空间打扰路人。#饭圈文化 #脑残粉 #私生代拍
不敢想象这卧室里面的味道。
汉光演习期间,伪台军坦克深夜还在大街跑,一男子朝坦克破口大骂
【西港杀人财通抛尸,4名中国人被判无期】 西港省法院8月5日判处4名中国人无期徒刑。 2025年7月18日,中国女子张如菊(音译)和中国男子董元元(音译)在西港第4分区的一家酒店被人杀害。凶手之后将2人的尸体拉到干拉省哥通县财通附近的百色河抛尸。
一位香港网友的老婆出轨一名韩国人 #抓奸
陕西洛南。#抓小三
🥰好看
这是干嘛🌚
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜**JISOU**帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_5226850793
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @xgcg888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 413,536 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“香港28吃瓜” (@xgcg888), 323 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xgcg888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.