Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for xexhahechki

Channel

xexhahechki

@xexhahechki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

191subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003340932192
TypeChannel
Username@xexhahechki
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xexhahechki

Growth

1711911817 August 2026 — 171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 171 subscribers14 August 2026 — 191 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168–194 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:07191+20
8 Aug 2026, 14:46171no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:25171first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

349 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 526491785085795186110229.2%
custom 52675219625439629988323.8%
custom 54002878928136695157320.9%
custom 5372865660500067203318.88%
custom 5402521799793581450318.88%
custom 5408995187387015251298.31%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
57
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 18 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xexhahechki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 April 2026 to 13 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 23:34 UTC797 views28 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 537286566050006720311custom 540252179979358145010custom 54089951873870152517

6 Jul 2026, 21:17 UTC839 views25 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 537286566050006720311custom 54025217997935814507custom 54089951873870152517

3 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC822 views20 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54089951873870152519custom 54025217997935814506custom 53728656605000672035

3 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC892 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☠️

custom 54025217997935814508custom 54089951873870152516custom 53728656605000672034

27 Jun 2026, 14:00 UTC838 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 52675219625439629987custom 52649178508579518614custom 54002878928136695154

27 Jun 2026, 13:57 UTC803 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52649178508579518618custom 54002878928136695155custom 52675219625439629984

Signed xD

26 Jun 2026, 21:45 UTC751 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54002878928136695158custom 52675219625439629985custom 52649178508579518614

Signed xD

26 Jun 2026, 20:22 UTC705 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52649178508579518618custom 52675219625439629984custom 54002878928136695154

Signed xD

26 Jun 2026, 20:22 UTC728 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😽

custom 52675219625439629987custom 52649178508579518614custom 54002878928136695154

Signed xD

18 Jun 2026, 01:18 UTC807 views17 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 526491785085795186110custom 54002878928136695154custom 52675219625439629983

Signed xD

6 Jun 2026, 23:06 UTC925 views17 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52675219625439629989custom 52649178508579518614custom 54002878928136695154

Signed xD

1 Jun 2026, 23:39 UTC944 views23 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟

custom 526752196254396299811custom 52649178508579518616custom 54002878928136695156

Signed xD

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @xexhahechki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 424,100 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“xexhahechki” (@xexhahechki), 191 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xexhahechki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.