Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 20 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 420.0%
- avg views ÷ 117 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 491
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.548%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 7
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
26 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC316 viewsread 27 September 2026 Photo
🎉 小耳朵的半价
🎁 奖品清单
• (@xerduo188)1p半价 × 1
🛡️ 参与条件
• 加入 惠州出击大队3.0群
• 加入 惠州出击大队2.0群
• 加入 惠州出击大队1.0群
• 加入 惠州公开榜1.0
• 加入 小耳朵👂高冷御姐❤️
• 需消耗积分:5
• 必须设置用户名
🔮 祝福加持
• 祝福消耗:100积分
• 祝福上限:无上限次
• 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号,提高中奖率
• 幸运值祝福:支持 幸运值说明
⌛ 抽选时刻
• 2026-09-30 17:30:00
📜 抽奖说明
刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、撤回内容等,一律视为无效发言,不计入统计!
再次重申:灌水无意义发言都不兑奖!请用心交流。
活动最终解释权归本群管理团队所有。
中奖的12小时内联系管理员领取 @Ajk1233
24小时内预约时间,72小时内出击,过时自动作废
炸号作废放回奖池重新抽奖
用了优惠劵要写报告!
✨ …
Signed Saber
26 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC326 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Forwarded from @hzcj123
【老师花名】:小耳朵
【课室位置】:金山雅苑小区
【联系方式】: @xerduo188
【上课费用】:700p
【出击时间】:9.26
【人照几分】:9
【身高身材】:10
【沟通态度】:10
【项目细节】:10
【是否超时】:否
【卫生环境】:好
【自由评论】:
首先课室私密性很高门禁小区, 老师是属于邻家妹妹带点御姐风类型,穿着频道那个视频衣服,有点娃娃脸,很清纯,很健谈,主动,浴室调情水萧,床上相互调情69式吃小鲍鱼,服务耳根到勾八嘴萧,口活专业,很久,纯天然奶子软软的,传教士老师热度很高,边亲边嘟,痛苦呻吟中又带点享受,下面很紧,水也多,是敏感体质,水都溢出来了,很丝滑,侧入时老师回头眼神迷离,喊老公很舒服,我实在遭不住这样,猛冲出水啦,完事床上揉着一起休息会,再去一起洗澡,很完美的一次邂逅,会返。
✅已核实聊天记录截图
❤3
Signed 小耳朵💃高冷御姐(金山湖)
26 Sept 2026, 09:58 UTC482 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Video
开课啦,惠州的宝宝们约起来哦😘😘
🥰2
Signed 小耳朵💃高冷御姐(金山湖)
25 Sept 2026, 18:46 UTC681 viewsread 27 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 小耳朵💃舌吻辣妹(金山湖)
25 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC652 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026 03年🫰身高165 🫰90斤🫰美🐻C 🫰会夹会吸,水超多..
❤️学前幼师刚下海🦋纯天然S身材🦋私密超紧🦋御姐风格🦋谈吐时尚优雅🦋性格开朗爱笑🦋兼职开课…
❤️🦋女友感觉🦋水中萧🦋鸳鸯戏水 🦋胸推臀推🦋花式吹萧 🦋深喉口🦋kiss🦋情趣勾引🦋激情爱爱 69
💰一课、700P(40分钟
二课、 1300PP(80分钟)
两小时1800(ppppp)
私信: @xerduo188
双向: @xerduo188bot
🈲:口嗨、🈚套,后花园。
❤3
Signed 小耳朵💃舌吻辣妹(金山湖)
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @xerduo1888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小耳朵👂高冷御姐❤️” (@xerduo1888), 117 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xerduo1888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.