Channel
@xepicfailll
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
99subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002045580384 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xepicfailll |
| Description | coding & web3 diary 🐋 [mev, crypto, coding] 👨💻 Contact - @a_semko |
| Created | 17 February 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xepicfailll |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 99 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 99 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 17 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
194 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 120 | 61.9% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 18.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 9.28% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 8.25% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.55% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2024 to 26 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет, хочу рассказать вам о своем новом проекте - Utopia Solutions Проект нацелен на концепцию AIO (All In One) — и в качестве первого модуля был добавлен снайп тг подарков *вы раните софт локально, подключаете свои прокси и тг аккаунты, все работает максимально чисто и прозрачно Сейчас мы на стадии бета теста, по этому кому актуально - залетайте и пользуйтесь полностью фо фри ✊ Для получения бетки открывай…
❤10
I sometimes envy the simple life. To know your potential is a blessing and a curse. You are left with two choices: to endure and pursue with all your being or to consciously let your future self slip by in front of your eyes and live to see the world change without you, later to meet people who ask about your past, reminding you of what you could have been. It is clear which path to take. It is hard to choose to corr…
❤5
«If you think about it every day you’re already there mentally, the physical realm is just a bit delayed, you must consistently be “winning” mentally and eventually, with time, physicality will reach equilibrium. The mental form of winning is a manifestation that increases the probability of the physical happening, as long as you do something, anything, each day.»
🔥8❤4
🦋 Мультичек на 🪙 100 USDT ($99.81). Сумма одного чека: 🪙 10 USDT ($9.98) Количество активаций: 10
❤12
Happy New Year 🎉✨ Надеюсь этот год вы провели достойно. В пришедшем году хочу пожелать вам аномального роста, вдохновления и реализации всех своих целей и желаний
❤5
#mev 😱 Flash Loans или займы без залога. Представим вы бот, который ищет арбитражные возможности в рамках одного чейна ☢️ В пример возьмем эфир. Вы находите возможность купить $PEPE на Uniswap, по цене на 10% дешевле, чем на SushiSwap Далее вы производите необходимые эстимации, и выясняете, что чтоб получить максимальный профит вам необходимо купить $PEPE на 10 ETH на Uniswap, чтоб продать его за 11 ETH на SushiS…
❤9🐳2
#mev 🌖MEV - рассвет PART 1 Solvers, Batch auctions, CoW Protocol В предыдущей серии постов про MEV мы поговорили про то кто это такие, как они зарабатывают и соревнуются. Но у вас скорее всего сложилось впечатление, что это грязная сфера, в которой цель солверов поиметь вас. 😞 Но это далеко не всегда так. MEV-боты могут так же помочь вам. Звучит интересно. В этом посте я хочу познакомить вас с CoW Procotol, кото…
❤🔥14❤2🔥2👍1
#mev #research Последнее время набиваю инфополе мев серчерами. Сегодня хочу познакомить вас с интересным персонажем - DeGatchi Меня приятно удивило то, что на конец 2020 года он был обычным Intern Solidity Developer 👨💻 (Кто не знаком, можно сказать это самая низкая каста в программировании) И в середине 2022 года он уже разработал прибыльного серчера. Чтоб вы понимали, создать серчера это достаточно простая затея…
❤9
#mev 🌒 MEV - темный лес PART 4 Коррупция в мев индустрии 🤯 Брайб - это "взятка" которую мы даем блок билдеру за то что именно наш бандл замайнится, а бандл конкурента будет отклонен. Логично что блок билдеру выгоднее взять бандл с бóльшим брайбом, так как это на прямую зависит от заработка билдера. Давайте рассмотрим на примере. Есть 2 серчера и 1 юзер, который хочет свап. Первый хочет засэндвичить юзера, а второ…
❤10🤩3🔥2
#mev 🌒 MEV - темный лес PART 3 Так кто же такие эти Флешботы и что за бандлы вместе с приватным мемпулом? 🤔 Данная организация залетела в мев индустрию со своими нововведениями, и сказала: Теперь вы будете создавать бандлы и отправлять их в наш приватный мемпул. Это означает, что когда серчер видит в мемпуле (публичном, не приватном) возможность для заработка, он как и раньше берет транзакцию юзера, оборачивает е…
❤11🔥4
#offtop Так же хочу поблагодарить ребят за то что поддержали инициативу Именно вы, те, кто поставили меня на этот путь, see you 🤜🤛
🔥11❤3
#mev 🌒 MEV - темный лес PART 2 В предыдущей части мы выяснили, что мев-боты могут сэндвичить транзакции обычных юзеров. В то время это был андеррадар, очень мало людей разбиралось в этом, но сфера быстро набирала обороты и все больше людей захотели разделить этот пирог. Предположим, что конкуренция выросла - и теперь несколько серчеров заинтересованы в снайпе одной и той же транзакции. Оба серчера видят в мемпуле …
❤20👍2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @xepicfailll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,349,324 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0xepicfailll” (@xepicfailll), 99 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xepicfailll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.