Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

فَيْض

@xelqr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

77subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002859167168
TypeChannel
Username@xelqr
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xelqr

Growth

7577769 Aug 2026, 05:15 — 75 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 21:30 — 75 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:41 — 77 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 05:1510 Aug 2026, 04:41
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–77 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:4177+2
9 Aug 2026, 21:3075no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:1575first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.1%
avg views ÷ 77 subscribers
Avg views / post
48.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total972
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC14 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @alathralnaf3

‏﴿‏وَبَشِّرِ الصَّابِرِينَ ۝ الَّذِينَ إِذَا أَصَابَتْهُم مُّصِيبَةٌ قَالُواْ إِنَّا لِلّهِ وَإِنَّا إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعونَ ۝ أُولَئِكَ عَلَيْهِمْ صَلَوَاتٌ مِّن رَّبِّهِمْ وَرَحْمَةٌ وَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْمُهْتَدُونَ﴾ انتقلت إلى رحمة الله عمتي دعواتكم لها بالرحمة والمغفرة والدرجات العلى من الجنة إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون

9 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC21 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @alkulifePhoto

مما يؤكد صحةَ ما ذكرته الدكتورة هيا القولُ المروي عن قبيصة بن ذؤيب: "كنت أنا، وأبو بكر بن عبد الرحمن نجالس أبا هريرة، وكان عروة بن الزبير يغلبنا بدخوله على عائشة، وكانت عائشة أعلم الناس يسألها الأكابر من أصحاب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم". هذا وإن كان في سنده الواقدي إلا أنه صحيح المعنى، فإن عامة أحاديث عائشة المعروفة والمشهورة كحديث الإفك وحديث بريرة وحديث حجها مع النبي ﷺ وقصصها مع النبي ﷺ يرويها عنها عدد معروف من

9 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC29 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @HilyaatAlwilyaa70File

﴿فَإِن آمَنوا بِمِثلِ ما آمَنتُم بِهِ فَقَدِ اهتَدَوا وَإِن تَوَلَّوا فَإِنَّما هُم في شِقاقٍ فَسَيَكفيكَهُمُ اللَّهُ وَهُوَ السَّميعُ العَليمُ﴾ [البقرة: ١٣٧] السوسي عن أبي عمرو

9 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC89 viewsread 9 August 2026

اللَّهُمَّ مَا أَصْبَحَ بِي مِنْ نِعْمَةٍ أَوْ بِأَحَدٍ مِنْ خَلْقِكَ فَمِنْكَ وَحْدَكَ لَا شَرِيكَ لَكَ، فَلَكَ الْحَمْدُ وَلَكَ الشُّكْرُ .

9 Aug 2026, 00:29 UTC30 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilfitnah

«القلب جُبِل على التعلق، فإن لم يتعلق بخالقه تمزّق بين المخلوقين. والله وحده هو الحي القيوم الذي لا يغيب ولا يخذل ولا ينقص، فمن علّق قلبه به وجد السكينة التي لا تُنال من سواه.»

8 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC85 viewsread 9 August 2026

أستغفر اللّٰه الذي لا إله إلا هو الحي القيوم واتوب إليه. لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين.

8 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026

قال حذيفة بن اليمان رضي الله عنه ❮ كان النَّاسُ يَسألونَ رَسولَ اللهِ ﷺ عَنِ الخَيرِ، وكُنتُ أسألُه عَنِ الشَّرِّ مَخافةَ أن يُدرِكَني، فقُلتُ: يا رَسولَ اللهِ، إنَّا كُنَّا في جاهِليَّةٍ وشَرٍّ، فجاءَنا اللهُ بهذا الخَيرِ، فهل بَعدَ هذا الخَيرِ مِن شَرٍّ؟ قال: نَعَم، قُلتُ: وهل بَعدَ ذلك الشَّرِّ مِن خَيرٍ؟ قال: نَعَم، وفيه دَخَنٌ، قُلتُ: وما دَخَنُه؟ قال: قَومٌ يَهدونَ بغيرِ هَديي، تَعرِفُ منهم وتُنكِرُ، قُلتُ: فه

8 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

القارئ: عمرو أحمد الدريني

8 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC87 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

حصِّنوا أنفسكم بذِكرِ الله، اقرؤوا ما تيسَّر لكم . قال ابن القيم رحمه الله : «حاجَةُ العَبدِ للمُعوّذات والأذكار ؛ أشدُّ من حَاجتِه للطعامِ والشّرابِ واللباس». قال ابن باز رحمه الله : ‏الأذكار والتعوذات من أعظم الأسباب في اتقاء شر السحر وغيره من الشرور لمن حافظ عليها بصدق وإيمان وثقة بالله واعتماد عليه .

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xelqr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 632,327 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فَيْض” (@xelqr), 77 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xelqr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.