Channel
@xcvrinn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003990939848 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xcvrinn |
| Description | القناة تختص في نقل المسائل وردود من كتب المرجع الديني السيد الشهيد الثاني محمد محمد صادق الصدر، كل يوم 5 مسائل أن شاء الله. قناة الأبحاث العلمية | t.me/xcvrin |
| Created | 8 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xcvrinn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 7 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 7 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 142 |
| Reactions total | 53 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
53 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 56.6% | |
| custom 5334910407440087380 | 13 | 24.5% | |
| custom 5388891953007974104 | 10 | 18.9% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
السؤال: هل يجوز حلق اللحية، وإذا حلقت هل يجزي عنها شيء؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: لا يجوز على الأحوط إلا إذا كان ترك الحلق يوجب سخرية ومهانة شديدة لا تحتمل عند العقلاء فيجوز حينئذٍ. وكذلك لو كان إكراهياً ومخالفاً للتقية أو كان بسبب مرض ونحوه. 📝: مسائل وردود، ج١, م٢٥٩ مسائل حول حلق اللحية
❤4
السؤال: لو أن الوالد أمر ولده بأن يحلق لحيته وهدده بالطرد مثلاً، هل يجوز مخالفته في حلقها أم لا؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: لا يجوز حلق اللحية بدون عذر شرعي ويجوز مخالفة الوالد إذا أمر بترك واجب أو فعل حرام. 📝: مسائل وردود، ج١, م٢٥٨ مسائل حول حلق اللحية
❤4
السؤال: أفتيتم بحرمة حلق اللحية فهل إن حالق اللحية فاسق وإذا كان كذلك فهل تجوز غيبته؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: نعم هو حرام ولكن لا تجوز غيبة حالق اللحية لاحتمال رجوعه إلى من يجوّزه أو كونه مضطرّاً إليه ولو بمقدار الحرج والمشقّة التي لا تتحمّل عادة. 📝: مسائل وردود، ج١, م٢٥٧ مسائل حول حلق اللحية
❤4
السؤال: ما هو رأيكم حول حلق اللحية؟ وهل يجوز ذلك لمن لا يسمح له وضعه الاجتماعي أو لمن خشي على نفسه الضرر؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: إذا أدّى إعفاء اللحية لشخص إلى هتكه أو خوفه الضرر على نفسه جاز حلقه وإلا لم يجز. 📝: مسائل وردود، ج١, م٢٥١ مسائل حول حلق اللحية
❤4
السؤال: بعض المرضى يضطرون لاستعمال آلة خاصة لعلاج ضيق التنفس توضع في الفم ويضغط عليها لتسهيل عملية التنفس لهم، فهل تضر بصوم من يستعملها في نهار شهر رمضان علماً بأنهم مضطرون لاستعمالها؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: الظاهر أنه يضرّ ذلك بصوم من يستعملها لاحتوائها على مواد زائدة على الأوكسجين. 📝: مسائل وردود، ج١, م١٥٦ مسائل حول الصوم
❤4
السؤال: ما هو حكم (الوشم) المتعارف عند بعض الناس بالرسم على بعض أعضاء الجسم بالنحو الذي يبقى ثابتاً ولا يزول، فهل يعد حاجباً يمنع من صحّة الوضوء والغسل والتيمم؟ وما هي وظيفة المكلّف الذي يكون على بعض أعضائه شيء من ذلك؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: إذا كان لوناً فقط لم يكن مانعاً من إيصال الماء للبشرة، وإن كان له جرم كان مانعاً، والظاهر أنه لا يعد له جرم مانع يمنع من وصول الماء ولا يعد حاجباً. 📝.مسائل وردود، ج١، م٢٣. مسائل حو…
❤3custom 53349104074400873803custom 53888919530079741042
السؤال: هل تعتبر المناديل الورقية مثل (الكلينكس) وما شابهه من الخِرق القالعة للنجاسة؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: لا بأس بالاستنجاء بمثل ذلك على الظاهر. 📝.مسائل وردود، ج١، م٢١.
custom 53349104074400873803❤2custom 53888919530079741042
السؤال: ما حكم مقاعد السيارات والقطارات التي يستعملها المسلمون والكفار مع أن الكفار أكثر عدداً في بعض المناطق، هل يحكم بطهارتها علماً بأن الجو يقتضي هنا التعرق بل وسراية الرطوبة؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: كل ما هو مشكوك فهو محكوم بالطهارة. 📝.مسائل وردود، ج١، م١٩.
custom 53349104074400873803❤2custom 53888919530079741042
السؤال: إذا كان عندنا ثلاث نجاسات (دم، غائط، بول) وكان عندنا صبتا ماء فقط، فهل يمكن تطهيرها بهذا الشكل: بأن نزيل عين النجاسة ونصب صبة ماء على المنطقة المتنجسة بالدم، ونجمع هذا الماء في إناءٍ ثمَّ نصب على المنطقة المتنجسة بالغائط من هذا الماء، ونجمعه فتبقى الصبتان بحوزتنا، وهكذا نطهر المنطقة المتنجسة بالبول. هذا كله مع زوال عين النجاسة؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: إذا صدق على الماء في أيّ مرّة أنه جارٍ فلا إشكال وإلا حكم بن…
custom 53349104074400873803❤2custom 53888919530079741042
السؤال: هل اعتمدت في فتوى من فتاواكم أو مسألة من مسائلكم على دليل العقل فحسب؟ الجواب: بسمه تعالى: لا ريب في أنَّ الأحكام الشرعية مجعولةٌ طبق المصالح والمفاسد الواقعية وليست مجعولةً جزافاً إلا أن عقولنا القاصرة لما لم يسعها أن تدرك المقتضيات، ودين الله لا يصاب بالعقول، فلأجله يتعيَن علينا أن نتعبَّد بالأدلة الشرعية السمعية من الكتاب والسُنّة. نعم، قد يدرك العقل البشري أموراً ضرورية واضحة لا يعتريها أي شكّ أو شبهة كحس…
custom 53888919530079741042❤1custom 53349104074400873801
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @xcvrinn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 339,542 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مسائل وردود السيد الشهيد” (@xcvrinn), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xcvrinn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.