The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
xBlast App Updates
@xblast_app
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
672,692subscribers
-80,454 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001767590165 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xblast_app |
| Description | Official Announcement Channel of xBlast App. Mine free wXBL t.me/xblastappbot/app Chat here: @xblast_chat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xblast_app |
Topic
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 07:50 | 672,692 | -1,937 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 13:00 | 674,629 | -2,822 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 677,451 | -7,102 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 05:25 | 684,553 | -644 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:57 | 685,197 | -757 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:28 | 685,954 | -1,313 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:01 | 687,267 | -1,599 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:50 | 688,866 | -690 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:19 | 689,556 | -675 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:10 | 690,231 | -892 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 691,123 | -879 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 692,002 | -674 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 692,676 | -893 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 693,569 | -929 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 694,498 | -435 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 694,933 | -614 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 695,547 | -582 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 696,129 | -619 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 696,748 | -739 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:07 | 697,487 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 25 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- —
- no view readings in window
- Avg views / post
- —
- no view readings
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (25 May 2024 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 78
- Videos
- 14
- Links
- 89
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
131,506 reactions across 20 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39,458 | 30.0% | |
| 👍 | 26,000 | 19.8% | |
| 🔥 | 16,388 | 12.5% | |
| 🍌 | 9,523 | 7.24% | |
| 👏 | 8,576 | 6.52% | |
| ⚡ | 4,467 | 3.40% | |
| 😁 | 4,167 | 3.17% | |
| 🤔 | 2,962 | 2.25% | |
| 🥱 | 2,916 | 2.22% | |
| 🤯 | 1,802 | 1.37% | |
| 🗿 | 1,299 | 0.988% | |
| 🤨 | 1,197 | 0.91% | |
| 👌 | 1,158 | 0.881% | |
| 💊 | 1,010 | 0.768% | |
| 😴 | 988 | 0.751% | |
| 🌚 | 970 | 0.738% | |
| 😢 | 768 | 0.584% | |
| 🥰 | 691 | 0.525% | |
| 👾 | 584 | 0.444% | |
| 🙈 | 464 | 0.353% | |
| 27 further kinds | 6,118 | 4.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131,506 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2024 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
xBlast App Under Maintenance We're currently performing maintenance on the xBlast App to improve your experience. The app will be unavailable for a short time. Thank you for your patience! We'll be back online soon.
👍4,070❤3,780😁979😴623🤔390💊373🤯372😈368
📢xBlast Campaign Season 2 is Live - Complete Quests, and earn a RM100 for 100 $XBL on @ton_blockchain - Duration: 20 days - Rewards: 3000 RM100 for eligible users. Head in our app and start completing the campaign season 2 now: t.me/xblastappbot
👍3,420❤1,090😁345💊289😴193🔥186🍓174🤯172
xBlast Campaign Season 2 is coming
👍1,700❤448😁298🤯141🔥85💊83🥰82🙉75
🎉We are excited to partnering with @therealyescoin 👍🏻Yes, probably something Stay tuned for what we are bringing to the web3 space.
👍2,860❤927😁318👏235🔥146😨115😴110🙈105
Building something new for wXBL
🍌2,440👍1,420❤738😁298🔥224🤔154👾116👀110
🎉We are excited to welcome Magic Square to our xBlast ecosystem. ✅Backed by Binance Labs, Magic Square is a unique Web3 ecosystem where you can easily find the best Web3 projects. These projects are carefully chosen and reviewed by our active community, ensuring a high-quality and enjoyable Web3 experience for every user, regardless of their background. Stay tuned for what we are bringing to the web3 space. https:…
👍2,670❤802🍌348🔥293😎92😈90💊89🎃81
🤝Thank you Magic Square for the successful validation. Checkout xBlast App on Magic Store: magic.store/app/xblast-app
👍2,490❤814🍌328🤔187🔥116👏88🥰87😁77
🚀 Exciting News! 🚀 We are partnering with JetTon Games to revolutionize DeFi and gaming on the TON blockchain in Telegram! 🔹 t.me/JetTon offers 5000+ top games, from slots and poker to 3D action and live games with 96.9% RTP. Instant deposits/withdrawals in fiat and crypto with a custodial wallet. 🌐Stay tuned for more updates on this groundbreaking collaboration! 💎
🔥1,530👍1,060🍌317😁138🤔79😎64😴62🙈60
It's a tweet, more available refining machines than season 1.
👍3,350🔥714🍌493🤔185👏104💯104😁96🫡93
🎉Have you seen your RM100 yet, winners? If you haven't been included, don't worry—this is just the first season of the xBlast campaign. There are still three more seasons ahead in our v2. Below are the wallet addresses eligible for the RM100. Please note that the wallet must have been connected from the beginning of our v2 and remain connected until now to view your RM100. 🥇Here is the winner list. You can filter …
👍1,220🍌1,190❤572👏121😨67🤯66😁58🌚55
📢The wait is over! Due to a high number of suspicious entries, manual review caused a slight delay. We're happy to announce that the review is complete and rewards (RM100 airdrop) have been distributed. If you're eligible, a new machine is now available in the app! No further action is needed, gas fees are covered. New XBL on @ton_blockchain contract address: https://tonscan.org/jetton/EQBEuPaUU0JIFQasb2gQrqNA0A63…
❤2,430👍1,740❤🔥431🍌239🔥163🤯95😁91🤔78
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @xblast_app. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“xBlast App Updates” (@xblast_app), 672,692 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xblast_app.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.