https://t.me/ruhum_sen

Channel
πΏπππππ | πͺππππππππππ | π¨ππ
@xattot_calligraphy
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
64subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001589595042 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xattot_calligraphy |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 2 September 2022 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xattot_calligraphy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 64 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 65 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 66 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 66 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 September 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 27s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 29 | 31.5% | |
| β€ | 25 | 27.2% | |
| π₯° | 14 | 15.2% | |
| π₯ | 13 | 14.1% | |
| π | 10 | 10.9% | |
| π€© | 1 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2022 to 4 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
@xattot_calligraphy
β€12π1π₯°1
Assalamu alaykum va rohmatullohu va barokatuhπΈ Hurmatli kanalimiz obunachilari sizlar bir ilitmosim bor edi.. Kim qoriya shogird chiqargan, o'zi ham qoriya bo'lgan, onlayn dars o'tadigan yoki o'toladigan qoriya o'qtuvchini bilsa yoki shundaylarni tanisa iltimos sizlardan bizga murojaat qiling! Murojaat uchun @xattota_nargiza Yordamilarni ayamelar iltimos.
π5
La ilaha illalloh Muhammadur Rosulullohπ @xattot_calligraphy
π₯°3β€2
Juma muborakπΈ
ΩΨ§ΩΨΉΨ΅Ψ± @xattot_calligraphy
π₯2π1π1
@xattot_calligraphy
β€6
@xattot_calligraphy
π₯°6
Xattotlik san'atiga qiziquvchi opa-singillarimiz uchun ajoyib taklif! π©βπXattotlik san'ati boΚ»yicha opa-singillarimizni darslarimizga taklif qilamiz. OΚ»quv muddati tolibalar darajasiga qarab belgilanadi. Sharti darslarga oΚ»z vaqtida qatnashish. Darslar onlayn tarzda bo'ladi. Oylik toΚ»lov 80,000 soΚ»m. Murojaat uchun ustozimiz: @xattota_nargiza Kanalimiz manzili: @xattot_calligraphy
π6π€©1
@xattot_calligraphy
π₯2
Juda go'zal qiroat oxirgacha eshtin.πΈ Surahπ : An-Naziat π:Islam Subhi
π3π1
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯3β€2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xattot_calligraphy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@xattot_calligraphy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 11 August 2026 β 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΏπππππ | πͺππππππππππ | π¨ππβ (@xattot_calligraphy), 64 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xattot_calligraphy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.