Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ོོ✘ ₉ⷮ₉ⷤ₉🪫🎧

Channel

ོོ✘ ₉ⷮ₉ⷤ₉🪫🎧

@xaroshi_4elovek

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

64subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003145426757
TypeChannel
Username@xaroshi_4elovek
Created19 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xaroshi_4elovek

Growth

6468667 August 2026 — 68 subscribers10 August 2026 — 68 subscribers16 August 2026 — 66 subscribers31 August 2026 — 64 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 24 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–69 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 18:1364-2
16 Aug 2026, 06:5366-2
10 Aug 2026, 01:0268no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:3868first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 19 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,032 reactions across 3 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 537554463346605848837718.6%
custom 537542674090875042932616.0%
custom 530764096858805462827513.5%
custom 587295350191450383023411.5%
custom 530534520548912763120710.2%
custom 54247511546533194462029.94%
custom 57897324374707474681658.12%
custom 53079665829436658411426.99%
custom 52377841200875892091045.12%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,032 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 4 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Nov 2025, 07:18 UTC790 views748 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Voice message

🖤🦁

custom 5375544633466058488157custom 5307640968588054628117custom 5789732437470747468104custom 530534520548912763175custom 537542674090875042975custom 530796658294366584174custom 587295350191450383074custom 542475115465331944672

31 Oct 2025, 07:55 UTC826 views677 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Voice message

⚜️🫦

custom 5375544633466058488150custom 5375426740908750429109custom 5237784120087589209104custom 530764096858805462864custom 530534520548912763163custom 542475115465331944663custom 587295350191450383063custom 578973243747074746861

31 Oct 2025, 07:42 UTC812 views607 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Voice message

💆🏼🤙🏿

custom 5375426740908750429142custom 587295350191450383097custom 530764096858805462894custom 537554463346605848870custom 530534520548912763169custom 530796658294366584168custom 542475115465331944667

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @xaroshi_4elovek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ོོ✘ ₉ⷮ₉ⷤ₉🪫🎧” (@xaroshi_4elovek), 64 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xaroshi_4elovek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.