Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝙻𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝙿𝚒𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜

@xLittlePieces

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

929subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001739533339
TypeChannel
Username@xLittlePieces
Created4 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xLittlePieces

Growth

9279299286 Aug 2026, 03:52 — 927 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:03 — 927 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:21 — 929 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 03:526 Aug 2026, 15:21
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 927–929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 15:21929+2
6 Aug 2026, 14:03927no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:52927first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 929 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (4 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,479
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5350679293968019666513.2%
custom 5379920578075467412513.2%
custom 5355082335526099164410.5%
custom 5413804236498548047410.5%
410.5%
custom 532582424521162939137.89%
custom 537992303479676411937.89%
custom 546530552435234909037.89%
custom 532562477834046611225.26%
custom 537743634751662555325.26%
🐳25.26%
🎉12.63%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ .. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ ₊⋆ ☾⋆⁺₊ 𝙻𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝙿𝚒𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜⁺₊⋆ ☾⋆⁺ . ݁˖ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖⁺₊⋆⋆. ݁₊ . ݁. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖

custom 53258242452116293913custom 53799230347967641192

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

6 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheDreamweaversEmporiumPhoto

𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕯𝖗𝖊𝖆𝖒𝖜𝖊𝖆𝖛𝖊𝖗'𝖘 𝕰𝖒𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖚𝖒

custom 53774363475166255532

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

5 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @xiurlesPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53256247783404661122

Signed 🍀 聖 • Clover Lady • 🍀

5 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC72 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

˗ˋˏ ♡ ˎˊ˗ 𝙻𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝙿𝚒𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜 ˗ˋˏ ♡ ˎˊ˗ ︵‿୨ ☼ ୧‿︵

custom 53550823355260991642custom 53506792939680196661

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

5 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC559 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

୧‿‌‌ ˖︵ ꕀ⠀ 𖤓 ⠀ ꕀ ︵˖ ‿‌‌୨ °.𝙻𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝙿𝚒𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜.° ʚ ═══・୨ 𖤓 ୧・═══ ɞ

3custom 53550823355260991642custom 53799230347967641191

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

5 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC106 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ .. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ ₊⋆ ☾⋆⁺₊ 𝙻𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝙿𝚒𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜⁺₊⋆ ☾⋆⁺ . ݁˖ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖⁺₊⋆⋆. ݁₊ . ݁. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖

🐳2custom 54653055243523490901

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

5 Aug 2026, 00:22 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @definitelynotachannelPhoto

Daily bunny no.3400 is out of control, 2026 Will Quinn

custom 53506792939680196662

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

5 Aug 2026, 00:21 UTC59 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @a_lvfPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

1

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

5 Aug 2026, 00:21 UTC58 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @a_lvfPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54138042364985480471

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

5 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @a_lvfPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53799205780754674124

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

5 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC71 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @a_lvfPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54138042364985480473

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

5 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC72 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @a_lvfPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53506792939680196662

Signed 🌱ᛏDandelion Boyᛉ🌱

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @xLittlePieces. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 175,233 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙻𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝙿𝚒𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜” (@xLittlePieces), 929 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xLittlePieces.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.