Channel
@xGRAILx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003617597977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xGRAILx |
| Created | 14 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xGRAILx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 49 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 49 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 14 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xGRAILx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 4 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 December 2025 to 12 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👑Know this, we have commenced the writing of a great chronicle; Iran in the Fires of Jihad. Here ( @IiTFoj ) shall be posted all tidings, reports, and developments regarding the tome as its tale is woven👑.
𝖧𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗇’𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗃𝗈𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗒 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗅 𝗒𝖾𝗍? @DarbareIran 👑
𝖦𝖱𝖠𝖨𝖫 𝖢𝗈𝗅𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 🩶𝖯𝗅𝖺𝗒𝖫𝗂𝗌𝗍: @GabrielAsylum 🏴𝖲𝗁𝗈𝗉: @VeinHaus 👑 𝖧𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗒: @DarbareIran 👑𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗒𝗌𝗂𝗌: @SoroodRahaei 🕷️𝖬𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖾: @DarbareCinema 🔞𝖨𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅: @VidPHMedia 🌟𝖭𝖾𝗍𝖲𝖾𝖼: @Hesiga 😤𝖦𝖺𝗆𝖾: @textgameIIbot 𝖠 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖾𝖽 𝗇𝖾𝗍𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗄 𝗈𝖿 𝗈𝖿𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌.
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @xGRAILx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 547,710 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝖦𝖱𝖠𝖨𝖫” (@xGRAILx), 49 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xGRAILx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.