Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πœ˜πΉπ›Όπ‘ πœ 𝐡𝑇𝐢

Channel

πœ˜πΉπ›Όπ‘ πœ 𝐡𝑇𝐢

@xFastxbtc

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

163subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002533292732
TypeChannel
Username@xFastxbtc
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xFastxbtc

Growth

163164163.57 August 2026 β€” 164 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 164 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 163 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163–164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 22:16163-1
8 Aug 2026, 16:31164no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:38164first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
49.8%
avg views Γ· 163 subscribers
Avg views / post
81.2
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.67%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held19 (26 June 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total487
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀2754.0%
πŸ‘1224.0%
πŸ”₯714.0%
πŸ†24.00%
🍌12.00%
🀑12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC78 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LTF - Quick update: I had no idea the FOMC was happening todayβ€”not that I usually pay much attention to it or careβ€”but there could be fakeouts and levels that aren't entirely precise or respected. The fact remains that dropping below the 63.8k–63.4k zone poses a high risk of invalidating yesterday's tapped level (yesterday's low). As mentioned in previous posts, the zone required to keep BTC safe is the 64.5k area (M…

❀4

29 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

weekly - beautiful bounce from the tapped level, closed my long, In my experience with TPO, after a precise tap on a key level, it is important to follow through; failing to hold that level would trigger a (potential) flush. That is why I wouldn't want to see the 63.8s area lost again. This is the first time since February 2026 that this VAL has been tapped.

❀2

28 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC85 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LTF - Trade executed as described: lost the 64 level and easily reached 62.7. It is best to hold from here; if 62.7 fails to hold, acceptance below that level puts 60.4 in play. Keep an eye on the upper SP and the invalidated POC (yellow arrow).

❀1

28 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC82 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

weekly - just remind how 62500+ is important, tapped on 1h VAL. 2h till new 4h open. watch.

❀2

27 Jul 2026, 23:48 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LTF - quick update after Monday 3dd open NY nd 9w balance. We failed to fill the blue SP zone, (watch last update) As I’ve been saying for some time, I wouldn't want to see the POCs failing to support the price (arrow yeallow mark today the 1s time) 2VA at the current high. The setups shown in this pic require great caution. To get back to a safe position, BTC needs to reclaim the 64.5 level, and push above. for week…

πŸ†1

26 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LTF - 2 setup mentioned in the previous post triggered a bounce; keep in mind that tomorrow open 3dd coinciding with Monday and 9w. This is really important; I wouldn't want to see the 64k level lost again, if so levels around 62,5-7 could easily be reached. The 62.7s is also key on the weekly chart (check the latest weekly update).

❀3

24 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC96 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LTF - TPO is one of the best tools ever, it always marks the best levels. TPO Orderflow is the only thing you really need; why make life complicated? lol 2 VA TOP; the weekend is approaching, and from Monday is going to be very important. As mentioned last time, for the trend to continue, the POCs from the previous VAs need to hold the price, just as have since the trend began. 1k points with almost zero DD. ggs.

πŸ”₯3🀑1

22 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

This isnt the usual kind of update I post, but I wanted to share it because its interesting. Please DONT take this too seriously, as this isnt how I trade. I trade exclusively based on levels, VAs, and orderflowβ€”not by trying to predict the future. Anyway, 1st pic(A) shows top 98s with an 8w balance in January 2026. The 2nd pic (B) shows the current situation, with the 8w still in progress. What I want to highlight …

πŸ‘2❀1

22 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LTF - The first level marked yesterday marked local topβ€”perfect. We are now inside an old VA with a VAH around 67350, but I would be cautious to short. The key points for me are the two levels belowβ€”as I noted yesterdayβ€”for keep the trend continue, POC must hold as did before. The 3dd opens on Friday important, but Monday the 27th is the date that really needs watching. all levels above marked last post still valid.

❀2

21 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

What I meant was that the first sign of weakness occurs when the previous day's POC fails to support the price as it had previously; therefore, if the upward movement continues, one should monitor the previous day's Value Areas (VAs) for the first signal of a reversal (likely two VAs at the top during a sideways phase).

πŸ‘1

21 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC83 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LTF - Honestly, the LTF picture is much less clear, especially after this period of sideways movement; while levels are being respected, there is always some uncertainty. As shown in pic, since the bottom at 58s, the VAs have moved upward/sideways; notably, each POC has supported the price and the subsequent VAs (marked with yellow X in the photo). There are some levels up (red marks), but getting an accurate LTF vie…

πŸ‘1

21 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

monthly - mvwap holding the price, 4th times. above 64500, as i said price move above with first sign of imbalance and if drop below during the retest, it is the first sign of weakness, potentially leading us back to the 60s (naturally, we should consult the weekly TPO for greater clarity). The 71s should be the first target if this area and the levels above (SPs) provide stability for the bulls.

πŸ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @xFastxbtc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπœ˜πΉπ›Όπ‘ πœ 𝐡𝑇𝐢” (@xFastxbtc), 163 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xFastxbtc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.