9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,190–9,291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 12:12
9,202
-24
23 Aug 2026, 16:29
9,226
-8
20 Aug 2026, 03:41
9,234
-8
16 Aug 2026, 20:23
9,242
-14
13 Aug 2026, 02:34
9,256
-9
9 Aug 2026, 16:31
9,265
-11
6 Aug 2026, 19:25
9,276
-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:17
9,279
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:42
9,279
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 9,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.597%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
23 (14 April 2026 – 24 August 2026)
Views total
4,523
Reactions total
27
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
356
Videos
9
Links
603
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
283 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
119
42.0%
🔥
93
32.9%
👍
44
15.5%
🤩
13
4.59%
👏
10
3.53%
🎉
2
0.707%
🤯
2
0.707%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 283reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $1.72k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $861k in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $2.73k generated
⚡ Energy: 2.92T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2091812227246596429
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $2.29k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $568k in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $1.84k generated
⚡ Energy: 2.94T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2089264145279688862
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $1.09k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $722k in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $2.26k generated
⚡ Energy: 2.96T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2086720875865452584
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $1.31k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $966k in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $2.99k generated
⚡ Energy: 2.98T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2084171391285531013
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $1.12k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $1.14M in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $3.55k generated
⚡ Energy: 3.00T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2081686637650858399
✅ Maintenance complete — Farms & Staking are live.
Rewards now stream per second instead of per block, ready for Supernova's 600ms rounds. Your rate is unchanged, identical totals over any hour or day.
No re-staking, no action needed. MEX and tokens emissions unchanged.
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2080288335688589660
⚙️ Scheduled maintenance - starting on Thursday, 12PM UTC
We're upgrading the Farms and Staking contracts ahead of Supernova, which takes MultiversX from 6s rounds to 600ms.
Rewards move from per-block to per-second accounting. Same rewards, same schedule, just measured in time instead of blocks.
⏱ Expected duration: 1 hour
⏸ Farms and stakings functionalities will be paused
👌 All funds are safe. Rewards will co…
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $1.55k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $1.77M in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $5.5k generated
⚡ Energy: 3.03T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2079102915915198504
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $1.78k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $1.47M in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $4.74k generated
⚡ Energy: 3.04T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2076566593472196783
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $1.06k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $893k in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $2.84k generated
⚡ Energy: 3.06T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2074054691428937740
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $1.73k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $1.05M in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $3.3k generated
⚡ Energy: 3.07T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2071514515074920718
Last week’s fees rewards recap on xExchange:
💰 Rewards: $7.1k for energy holders
📊 Volume: $1.09M in trades
💸 Swap Fees: $3.5k generated
⚡ Energy: 3.07T committed
Check out more in-depth stats: https://xexchange.com/explore
RT: https://x.com/xExchangeApp/status/2068961294208901160
❤7👍2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @xExchangeAnn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MultiversX - Announcements @MultiversXAnn · 308,966 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Lumia News @lumia_news · 108,850 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Crypto Expert @cryptoexpert · 112,530 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“xExchange Announcements” (@xExchangeAnn), 9,202 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xExchangeAnn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.