Channel
@xAmberdream
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004408538382 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xAmberdream |
| Description | Φ΄ Ϋ«β Χβ ππ»πΈ @Dianx01bot ββπ΄ ππππ‘π‘π¦ ππππ π ππππ‘π‘π¦ π ππ’π π¦’πΈ |
| Created | 2 August 2026 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xAmberdream |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 22 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 22 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (2 August 2026 β 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 585 |
| Reactions total | 109 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 11 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
109 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| customΒ 5282904409389412843 | 19 | 17.4% | |
| customΒ 5301265501953994740 | 18 | 16.5% | |
| customΒ 5301184185338178098 | 17 | 15.6% | |
| customΒ 5366192720136123470 | 12 | 11.0% | |
| customΒ 5328107131998600322 | 10 | 9.17% | |
| customΒ 5328255643377759908 | 9 | 8.26% | |
| customΒ 5282842179608260217 | 7 | 6.42% | |
| π | 5 | 4.59% | |
| customΒ 5283091897596784256 | 4 | 3.67% | |
| customΒ 5402396137640445494 | 3 | 2.75% | |
| π | 2 | 1.83% | |
| customΒ 5283278101608935291 | 1 | 0.917% | |
| customΒ 5310239372262523492 | 1 | 0.917% | |
| customΒ 5325982725209880172 | 1 | 0.917% |
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ΰ½²κ°βπβπβπ π πππππππ ππππ, πππ€ππ¦π πππ π‘ ππ π π€ππππ ππππ¦ βππ βππππ‘ ππππ€π π
customΒ 52832781016089352911customΒ 53102393722625234921
Channel name was changed to Β«οΎ οΎ πκ¨αͺΎ πππππππ βπππΰΎΝ‘έ β Χ β Β»
π₯ππππΊππ½ ππππ ππΎπππΊππΎ π¨βπ π ππππΎ πππ ππππΎπππππ π πππΎ ππππ β γ € γ € γ € γ € π«ππππ : π£π§ π ππππ ππΎππΎ
βΛβΉ κ© π₯ππ ππ πππΎπΎπππΎπΊππ ππππ πππ»πΎ ππ ππ πππ
customΒ 53011841853381780986customΒ 53282556433777599083customΒ 53661927201361234703
@xAmberdream
customΒ 53011841853381780987customΒ 53661927201361234705
β π₯ππππΊππ½ ππππ ππΎπππΊππΎ πΊππ½ π¨'π π ππππΎ πππ ππππΎπππππ π πππΎ ππππ πΜΈ ΜΜβ βββ ββ β β β ββ β β ββ βπ ππππ β β: β βπ£π£ β β β― β π©πππ ππΎππΎβ β β β β .α
File, posted without a caption
customΒ 53011841853381780984customΒ 53282556433777599084customΒ 53661927201361234704
Photo, posted without a caption
customΒ 528290440938941284310customΒ 52830918975967842564customΒ 54023961376404454943
Sticker, posted without a caption
I wish I was the kind of person who didnβt have to pretend they were okay just to make everyone else comfortable. Someone who could admit they were tired without feeling like a burden.
customΒ 52829044093894128436customΒ 53012655019539947405
γ €Χ β¨βα·Ό π Χ Φ΄ "ππ―ππΊ π₯π° πΈπ©π’π΅ πΊπ°πΆπ³ π©π¦π’π³π΅ π΅π¦πππ΄ πΊπ°πΆ." ββ ββα«α«α«βα«π«ππππππ π π·ππππ β β γ € β ΰ£οΈΆβΦβ β Χ γ €α©΅αͺ²αͺ» Φ΄ βΦοΈΆ βΰ£ γ € γ €
customΒ 52828421796082602177customΒ 52829044093894128433
β β γ € β ΰ£οΈΆβΦβ β Χ γ €α©΅αͺ²αͺ» Φ΄ βΦοΈΆ βΰ£ γ € γ €
customΒ 53012655019539947409customΒ 53281071319986003226π2customΒ 53259827252098801721
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @xAmberdream. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,023,863 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βοΎ οΎ πκ¨αͺΎ πππππππ βπππΰΎΝ‘έ β Χ ββ (@xAmberdream), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xAmberdream.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.