Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for х11х

Channel

х11х

@x11xinferno

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

39subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002520561571
TypeChannel
Username@x11xinferno
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 29 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/x11xinferno

Growth

394039.57 August 2026 — 40 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40 subscribers15 August 2026 — 39 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:5839-1
10 Aug 2026, 19:1540no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:2740first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 29 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 15 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54721049386182363965022.5%
custom 53055068895329939812410.8%
229.91%
🔥167.21%
💔125.41%
custom 530756386104019418794.05%
👏94.05%
83.60%
😢83.60%
🍓62.70%
🏆62.70%
👍62.70%
52.25%
💊52.25%
😁52.25%
😨52.25%
🤩52.25%
😭41.80%
🤮41.80%
🆒31.35%
8 further kinds104.50%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2025 to 19 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Apr 2025, 18:26 UTC293 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

хз представьте что ее избили оскорбленные ценами на свечки прихожане

😢8🍓2👍21😭1

12 Apr 2025, 18:25 UTC587 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ловите пока косоеблую бабку КХАХАХА НУ БЛЯ ПЕРЕДЕЛЫВАТЬ ТАКОЕ СТАРЬЕ Я НЕ БУДУ НО ЯВИТЬ МИРУ НАДО ✨TAGS:: #old #fullfledged @x11xinferno • sub

🔥7custom 53055068895329939815🤩3

12 Apr 2025, 17:59 UTC214 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

тише не разбегайтесь скоро коллабы залью с прекрасными людьми

5🍓2🤗1

10 Apr 2025, 14:50 UTC567 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

господа, нам надо абстрагироваться от всех этих радикальных настроений и душой вернуться к нашим истокам — всеми любимым хромо-поням!!! TAGS:: #mlp #fullfledged #old @x11xinferno • sub

custom 53055068895329939816🤩211😈1

8 Apr 2025, 05:39 UTC619 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

•••ÜLD ((хд не обращ внимание на этих кривоногих блябей, так и нада)) Я НЕ ЗНАЮ СКТЛЬКО МЕСЯЦЕВ ЭТОМУ НЕДОРАЗУМЕНИЮ НО ЗАПОСТИТЬ ТАКОЕ ЯВНО СТОИТ)) ⚡️Tod für Untermenschen, Tod für Entarteten. Ruhm für die Nation⚡️ TAGS:: #old #fullfledged @x11xinferno • sub

custom 54721049386182363968🍓21custom 53055068895329939811

5 Apr 2025, 08:01 UTC249 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @headlesschan

это не слух, не фейк, не трюк. мир потерял баланс, и трещина пошла прямо по небесам . тот кто держал реальность на сквозняка абсурда и правды , ушёл . и вместе с ним ушёл и смысл . паша был не просто человеком — он был багом в системе . голосом улиц , божеством дури . сейчас этот голос замолчал . навсегда

💔5😭2🙊21

4 Apr 2025, 19:15 UTC248 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Бб челикс, спасибо за мемы

💊51💔1😇1

4 Apr 2025, 19:07 UTC224 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @markkmason

press f pasha(

💔61👾1custom 53075638610401941871

3 Apr 2025, 16:51 UTC613 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⬛️FXCKIN’ COLLAB WiTH :: @WhoIsSSalt ⬅️ ••• TAGS:: #hitler #benito #collab

custom 5472104938618236396125custom 53055068895329939812🔥1🤮1

3 Apr 2025, 16:51 UTC246 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

а нет, ловите 🔥КОНТЕНТИЩЕ🔥

3

3 Apr 2025, 16:51 UTC250 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

да отпишитесь вы уже ёбаный в рот!!!!

😨5👍21😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @x11xinferno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,048,071 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“х11х” (@x11xinferno), 39 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x11xinferno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.