Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

江枫の小窝

@wywwds

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

62subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003931525053
TypeChannel
Username@wywwds
Description不定期公益打号思路
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/wywwds

Previous handles

@wywwds was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@wywwds
held 10 August 202610 August 2026

Growth

6062616 August 2026 — 60 subscribers6 August 2026 — 62 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60–62 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:4662no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:3062+2
6 Aug 2026, 08:3160first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 62 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.7
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total203
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Videos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC2 viewsread 10 August 2026

🌟 小昼互推 接纳各种小频道 请不要删除此信息否则取消互推资格 1. 熬夜 2. 和平78\REX直装官方频道 3. 王者荣耀小土豆直装 4. 七夜改文件官方频道🇨🇳 5. AS cheat MOD 🇨🇳 4\.5 6. RKR直装官方频道 7. 陈少改文件主频道 8. 小宇皮肤号🇨🇳 9. 寒冰数据号 10. 李宁公益官方🇨🇳 11. 无缘公益项目频道 12. 秋雨账号 和平账号 其他账号 13. 川少\(免费数据号\) 14. 弥海砂八级号 15. 黑夜的窝 📌 共 85 个频道加入互推 📄 第 1/6 页

Signed 小昼互推_Bot

9 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC10 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @douhao666666Photo

江枫果照来了,不准截图保存😋😋😋

8 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC8 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @douhao666666

频道 @douhao666666 破50人发江枫果照

8 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC11 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @wuyuan886

tt语音明星房文本 房间语音辱骂,侵害未成年身心,通过辱骂他人来满足自己的虚荣心,严重违反了《青少年身心保护法》及tt语音社区规范,另外还以玩明星房为荣,在别人房间一直问拜不拜,不拜他,他就换小号及让他的好友对房间人员进行辱骂,炸麦等,严重拉低了我们对tt语音的期望,恳请审核员对该账号进行全面且严格的核查,对其进行封号30天处罚,还tt语音一个文明和谐的社交环境,在这里我先替我们这些希望tt语音早日变成广告宣传那样的环境的人谢谢审核员了 反馈=更多公益文本 反馈:@wuyuanNB886 双向:@wuyuan6699bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wywwds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“江枫の小窝” (@wywwds), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wywwds.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.