Engagement
16 posts held, back to 17 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.9%
- avg views ÷ 10,412 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,850
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
31 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC≈3,270 viewsread 18 August 2026 Forwarded from @journey_of_someone
为啥我的人生基本上没回撤呢？
- 我2025年末就已经实现了以前20岁的自己给30岁的自己指定的财务目标
- 随着加密市场的萎靡、市场的成熟，我的印钞机停滞了、失去了往日那样牛市里每个月赚几M-十几M的持续造血能力，所以说实话现阶段多赚$10m对我来说没有任何吸引力（人生目标都实现了 再多加点多巴胺刺激也有限），而亏损$1m对我来说很心疼（亏的都是我有限的不可再生资源）。
我现在的“心疼阈值”大概是10万美元，手动主观交易单笔如果亏损超过这个数额我就会心疼。
- 我的75%+的财富都来自2021-2025加密市场蛮荒时代的信息优势、低延迟优势，15%来自发生一年几次的黑天鹅事件时的出手抄底，剩余10%才是投资和长线主观交易。
我在没有主场信息优势的情况下做主观交易和普通人无异，所以做我不熟悉的领域的时候我只会拿我可以接受亏损的蚂蚁仓去测试着赌博玩，亏了拉倒。
- 我虽然执着于维持财富数字，但财富观依然是按照现实物价计算的，…
Signed taresky
31 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC≈4,420 viewsread 18 August 2026 #投资
零零后富一代：
我有一种特有的执念 “既然你们都说年少发财容易飘 年少得志不得善终” 那哥就要让世人看看什么是刘銮雄式的“年少得志然后爽一辈子”。
——
以上才是真赚钱的人的想法。
能赚钱的人，就是从第一天就赚钱，一直赚钱，不亏钱，少亏钱。
从来都不是屌丝营销号，月薪 3000 运营说的：你一定要经历一次破产，才能浴火重生，不经历大风大浪是学不会的。
这种鬼话是拿来钓赌狗，吃返佣的。
而且哈哈哈哈哈哈，真的很好笑，学不会真实原因是蠢啊。
从别人的失败里学不到经验的人，就不该碰投资。
Signed taresky
12 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC≈6,380 viewsread 18 August 2026 Photo
不知真假，可以试试。
https://www.plasma.org/download/FAFAFA
Signed taresky
7 Jul 2026, 01:59 UTC≈7,720 viewsread 18 August 2026 《黑暗投资暴论》
私货输出
🔗 https://taresky.com/my-ego
Signed taresky
6 Jul 2026, 04:28 UTC≈6,790 viewsread 18 August 2026 Photo
#TenPayGo #U卡
测了一下微信支付海外版 TenPayGo。
不要 KYC 了。背后真正含义是：
1️⃣ 没有了每年额度上限，外卡和 U 卡都可以日常用了。
2️⃣ 微信主动放弃了区分“转账”和“付款”的风控。
早上给跑刀鼠鼠打钱，ApplePay 付款失败，但是绑卡付款成功。要了一个收款详情截图，那边大概长这样。
Signed taresky
18 Jun 2026, 05:10 UTC≈7,930 viewsread 18 August 2026 Photo
#U卡
抱歉各位，我要纠正之前的数据。
刚才朋友给我截图，我才发现自己遗漏了重要信息 —— Plasma 新版之后，返现是梯度降低的。关键内容在点击 Cashback 弹框里。
数据错误，用 AI 按新数据重新绘图如下：
1. Lite 用户，实际不存在，忽略。
2. Core 用户，每月只有前 $1,000 返现 3%，不建议超过这个金额。
3. Platinum 用户，每月前 $10,000 返现 4%～3%，不建议超过这个金额。
4. Core 用户，每月白嫖 $8 GPT，没有变化，依然是好福利，希望保持。
5. Core 用户，如果 $1000 不够用，建议用家人的号。Plasma 单号 $1000，EtherFi 单号 $2000，都是优势区间。
---
最后，如果你被我之前的错误信息误导了，再次抱歉，对不起，我不是有意的。
在（推特）评论区留下你的 @ Plasma ID，每人发 $5，取前 …
Signed taresky
16 Jun 2026, 13:10 UTC≈6,270 viewsread 18 August 2026 #U卡
Ready Card 销卡退费了，挺好。
剩余 USD（USDC）可以充值到 Binance，选 Starnet 网络。注意不是常规 EVM 地址。
https://x.com/taresky/status/2066867265296073092?s=20
Signed taresky
13 Jun 2026, 03:58 UTC≈7,030 viewsread 18 August 2026 Photo
#U卡
考虑返现比例、安全性、持久性，Plasma 和 EtherFi 是目前唯二推荐的卡。
让 AI 画了一张返现对比图，更直观一点。
1. 如果你能注册 EtherFi，多一个选项没坏处。
2. 月消费低于 $9278，Core 都好于 EtherFi。
3. 随后 EtherFi 反超 Core，但仍不如 Platinum。
尽量在新版发布前激活 Plasma，免费拿一年的 Core。更多详情看上文。
🌟 Plasma 邀请码 FAFAFA 🌟
🔗 EtherFi 邀请链接 https://s.taresky.me/etherfi
Signed taresky
12 Jun 2026, 11:41 UTC≈5,780 viewsread 18 August 2026 #U卡
2026/06/12 更新（建议读完）：
Plasma 等级的介绍已经出来了，有些细节写的不是很清楚，目前理解如下：
1️⃣Lite
免费，当前返现从 3% 降低到 2%，上限 $250/月。
没有太多可说的，有更好选择的就换，没有就用，毕竟依然无门槛+正收益。
2️⃣Core
年费 120USD，返现3%，上限 $250/月。
送 ChatGPT Go 价值 $96/年（官网写的 $250 有误）
AI 返现 5% 但上限消费 $500，相对于每月总返现 $250 对应的 $8333 来说，比例并不高。
适合哪些人：
- 每个月消费不低于 $333 的人，回本线。
- 每个月订阅 $200 GPT 和 $200 Claude 的人，这里已经返了 $20，覆盖了每月 $10 的成本，多刷的是赚的。
3️⃣Platinum
返现4%，上限 $1000/月（据说可以更高，待定）。
送 Claude…
Signed taresky
3 Jun 2026, 10:31 UTC≈6,440 viewsread 18 August 2026 Photo
#省钱
刚用 Trip + U 卡定了国内的亚朵酒店，和官网同价，并额外返现了 8% 😌
这套组合正好规避了：
1. 微信支付宝超 200 收手续费 —— 但 Apple Pay 不收
2. U 卡付人民币有货币转换费 —— 但 Trip 支持设置里改成 USD 付款，还没有隐藏费用
正好吃满 Trip 返现 5% + Plasma 返现 3% = 8% 返现
Trip 不同等级返现有差异，但总体还是更省了。亚朵是官网同价，记得提前看一眼。
Trip 是携程国际版，国内资源一样多。机票、打车等等也同理可省。
如果有帮助
🔗 Trip 邀请链接：https://s.taresky.me/trip
🔗 Plasma One Card 邀请码 🌟FAFAFA🌟
Signed taresky
29 May 2026, 16:15 UTC≈6,930 viewsread 18 August 2026 Photo
#U卡 #Plasma
这个月热门的 Plasma One Card，是目前（中国护照可用的）U 卡最优解：
1️⃣ 全类目返 3%
2️⃣ 中国护照可申
3️⃣ 支持 Apple Pay、微信、支付宝
🌟邀请码：FAFAFA🌟（有次数限制，需要的上吧）
一些细节：
1. 有海外 ID 或驾照的优先用，通过效率更高，推荐驾照。
2. 用护照+海外地址证明（选对应地区居民），推荐用账单。
3. 建议用非 +86 手机号接验证码（仅开户需要，绑卡等验证可以走邮箱）。
4. 全品类返现 3%，汇损 1.2%，卡 BIN 是 454924，和 EtherFi 同门。
5. AI 类消费返 10%（短期活动）。
6. 月返上限 $250，对应消费 $8333 😌
7. UI/UX 做得最好，没有之一，团队有钱更安心。
8. 站内转账体验很好，用户名允许四字 （建议抢注好记的）。
注意事项：
1. 如果 KYC 资料识别失败，可以…
Signed taresky
5 May 2026, 17:07 UTC≈8,910 viewsread 18 August 2026 Photo
#U卡
2026年5月更新：
1. Ready Card 改积分制，中国 KYC 不再返现。
2. 即使有，看到网友说实际返现变成了 1%，有叠加邀请人头才能提高的规则。
总结：懒得看了，Ready Card 已废。
一个（可能）的替代品，Juptier Card。
1. 返现 4%，$100/m 封顶。(通过邀请用户来提升）
2. 非 USD 货转 1.8%，具体的我多刷点实测下再补充到评论区。
3. 支持 Apple Pay。卡段 441364。
4. 新手礼是激活 30 天内消费 $1000 额外奖励 $100。
我尝试了几种注册方式：
1. 日本驾照 + 日本银行账单，过了。
2. 中国身份证 + 日本银行账单，没过，并且无法继续提交。
3. 日本 ID + 日本银行账单，审核没过，可以重新提交。
请勿选择地区为中国（有推友测试香港也不行），官方明确支持：开曼群岛、日本、马来西亚、墨西哥、新西兰、尼日利亚、…
Signed taresky
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @wxjdqtg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,073,783 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“我想捡点钱” (@wxjdqtg), 10,412 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wxjdqtg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
