Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 投机之路

Channel

投机之路

@journey_of_someone

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31,002subscribers

+498 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002631914757
TypeChannel
Username@journey_of_someone
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/journey_of_someone

Growth

30,50431,00230,7537 August 2026 — 30,504 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,508 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,513 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,516 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,525 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,534 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,535 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,543 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,664 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,693 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,002 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +498. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,429–31,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:1931,002+309
16 Aug 2026, 06:0830,693+29
14 Aug 2026, 17:3330,664+121
13 Aug 2026, 04:3430,543+8
12 Aug 2026, 05:3830,535+1
11 Aug 2026, 04:4130,534+9
10 Aug 2026, 07:5730,525+9
9 Aug 2026, 05:0230,516+3
8 Aug 2026, 03:2030,513+5
7 Aug 2026, 03:4030,508+4
7 Aug 2026, 00:0130,504first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.8%
avg views ÷ 31,002 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,300
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 April 202613 August 2026)
Views total127,900
Reactions total2,492
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10,209 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4,34242.5%
3,23531.7%
🤣1,16411.4%
👏2442.39%
😢2212.16%
😁2152.11%
😱1721.68%
🤔1531.50%
💯1231.20%
910.891%
🔥510.5%
🥰510.5%
🤩340.333%
😈300.294%
🌭270.264%
🤯200.196%
🙏180.176%
🎉130.127%
🏆50.049%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈11,600 views329 reactionsread 17 August 2026

今天还做了一个操作是:退出了我1/3的BTC头寸 @63k(用BTC/USD1永续套保)😂😂😂 确实说是不卖的但现在又要卖了 我只是觉得: - BTC当然后面依然有牛市,就和任何金融资产一样有周期,只是它目前的叙事完全被AI给盖过了并且可预见的未来1-2年也看不到新叙事 - BTC剩余的核心叙事=法币替代/对冲法币贬值,所以下一轮牛市当然得依靠美债出点问题/美元出点问题>驱动“cash is trash这种叙事”,但短时间内似乎看不到出这么大的问题 - BTC的下一轮牛市的发生必然基于“美债/美元出点问题”,但它们真的出点问题之前必然会有全球资产的重新定价 所以我预期我在1-3年内能以更便宜的价格(预期45-55k)把这个头寸买回来 ———————— 我依然保留我2/3的现货因为人生需要这种垫底资产,预防万一

236👍28👏21😁18🤣10😱7💯4🔥2

13 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈11,400 views137 reactionsread 17 August 2026

当时卖的期权基本上已经实现80-98%利润了 今天趁着行情暴涨我大部分已操作平仓

👏82👍3510🎉6🤣2🥰2

1 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC≈25,600 views347 reactionsread 17 August 2026

本来打了挺多字想骂一骂 但想了想咱不能惹大清 所以还是算了 https://x.com/morris_lt/status/2083367314809143648

🤣245👍4124🤔11😁9😢9🤯8

31 Jul 2026, 05:50 UTC≈28,800 views1,091 reactionsread 17 August 2026

为啥我的人生基本上没回撤呢? - 我2025年末就已经实现了以前20岁的自己给30岁的自己指定的财务目标 - 随着加密市场的萎靡、市场的成熟,我的印钞机停滞了、失去了往日那样牛市里每个月赚几M-十几M的持续造血能力,所以说实话现阶段多赚$10m对我来说没有任何吸引力(人生目标都实现了 再多加点多巴胺刺激也有限),而亏损$1m对我来说很心疼(亏的都是我有限的不可再生资源)。 我现在的“心疼阈值”大概是10万美元,手动主观交易单笔如果亏损超过这个数额我就会心疼。 - 我的75%+的财富都来自2021-2025加密市场蛮荒时代的信息优势、低延迟优势,15%来自发生一年几次的黑天鹅事件时的出手抄底,剩余10%才是投资和长线主观交易。 我在没有主场信息优势的情况下做主观交易和普通人无异,所以做我不熟悉的领域的时候我只会拿我可以接受亏损的蚂蚁仓去测试着赌博玩,亏了拉倒。 - 我虽然执着于维持财富数字,但财富观依然是按照现实物价计算的,

689👍276💯34🤣26😁15👏14🔥10🤩8

28 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC≈25,500 views292 reactionsread 17 August 2026

后面又加了点,现在手有点颤抖 类似10.11那晚打字抖抖的浑身哆嗦的感觉

154🤣60👍49🤔14😁7👏4🥰4

28 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC≈25,000 views296 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

今天卖了快$7m的PUT 100%现金备兑 其中大部分是一个月后行权 我不是什么AI专家 也不是什么期权交易员 但我知道: 1. 当前的存储板块的下跌至少在情绪面已经接近极限,所有厉害的交易员们都在哀嚎说自己想不到这样的行情会发生&储存股的IV在历史最高百分位。 2. AI革命依然在继续&需求依然在继续&一个月前人们在喊的基本面并没有改变,相当于同样的商品价格一个月后打了35-50%折扣 至于为什么要卖这种“很难成交的价格”而不是卖贴近目前盘面的价格———这是因为我个人不喜欢风险而喜欢稳定的钱,以一个月后到期的MU 660PUT为例,我现在卖15张=立马收获$4.7万利润,且如果一个月后MU真的跌破660&触发交割,我$1m买到的价格将是超级好的价格

181👍71🤣20💯17🌭6👏1

13 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC≈32,900 views821 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

捐赠了1万U做慈善,大部分网络渠道捐给韩红基金会了,还有一小部分会用作现实世界里的慈善。 LBANK交易所2024年的时候因为我一个账户赚的太多而把我号给冻结了,还好我有定时提现的习惯,被封号的时候账户里只剩2万U,客服说“您的资金只能交易不能提现”。 但就前几天我突然想起这事情登录账户一看发现居然解冻了,遂提现之并捐赠一半给慈善事业。 ———可以说本文由Lbank赞助了😂

👍551🤣9794😱25😁17🤔9💯8👏6

16 Jun 2026, 01:32 UTC≈47,400 views965 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

平仓认输了,最终亏了6万多。 刚刚SpaceX一小时里跳涨了15%,已经证明了我的这笔赌博是错误的(它并不是软柿子,2T市值能在无新闻的情况下跳涨那么多,证明其流动性现在确实很低&在市场情绪好的情况下后面不确定会被squeeze成什么样) 我依然觉得这公司被极度高估, 只是我想找一个更好的时间窗口再考虑再执行此交易(潜在的好窗口是等员工手里的20%份额解锁) 当前该收手了。

👍522🤣25753😁43😱33😢278😈8

10 Jun 2026, 22:37 UTC≈41,900 views543 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

柿子要找软的捏 裸空了点人类的未来,瞎jb赌博玩玩 计划持仓3-12个月,我内心最多可以接受在这笔交易承受10万美元的亏损 已套误跟

277😱83👏48😁38🤣34👍28🤔17🌭9

5 Jun 2026, 15:44 UTC≈45,500 views932 reactionsread 17 August 2026

又到了一个这样连续下跌的时刻 我知道很多人在等待我发抄底的信号,等我操作的时候我会发的。 我依然会执行我的“抄底只买急跌” 原则,现在这样缓慢的钝刀子割肉我是不会买的 得看到比如BTC几分钟内跌3-5%这种大规模清算发生再出手。 蹲不到就不买,反正赚多赚少几个钱无所谓。 而不亏钱很重要

574👍280🥰1918💯11🤔9🎉7😈5

2 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC≈45,200 views1,126 reactionsread 17 August 2026

完全错过了这波半导体行情 恭喜抓住的人们——无法想象最近你们有多爽 well,这就是我追求“稳定”要付出的代价吧 我依然85%在现金上老老实实吃利息,我不会突然暴富,我也不会突然跌落 我的目标就是守护2022-2025积累的成果,然后蹲守狙击到下一次“一切都打大折”的机会。 时间和耐心⏳

👍878135💯26🤣23👏20😢12😁8🙏8

24 May 2026, 18:58 UTC≈48,800 views1,024 reactionsread 17 August 2026

过去的一个月我几乎没有任何网络分享欲,体验了一把传说中的“低调生活”(我以前以为我永远不可能做到)。然后我现在理解了,大概只有这样的低调性格的人才能赚着美元在中国生活。 其实吧 老中并不管你在某一个地方过的多爽,只要不炫耀不惹事不骂zf》不去提高社会治理成本 〉大隐隐于市,那你安安稳稳的过也没人管。 其实我们这些在海外的中国人对待中国的态度就应该像1800-1880年间那些南洋的华商,在南洋可以剪辫子穿西装出行,偶尔回大陆办事经商就剃个光头买一顶假发遵守大清律例给足大清面子。 不要去动摇“稳定”这个红线,不要去损大清的面子,那其实你的日子是过的很爽的。

👍734🤣11493🤔20😁19👏16🤯7🥰7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @journey_of_someone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 220,175 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“投机之路” (@journey_of_someone), 31,002 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/journey_of_someone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.