谋生的路上大家都很辛苦 只是都没有说而已 因为眼里有盼头心里有希望
❤1👍1

Channel
@wx_17
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
81,281subscribers
-32,874 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002140966174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @av465 @h777w @id465 @jjjsy @kkkl5 @q6661 @sucai900 @wx_17 @zdddu |
| Description | 你说山高路远 害怕爱的人失之交臂 我说风雨不定 爱你的人永生相随 🎵深夜网易云 @auvvip 投稿 @zhangwansen |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 459 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wx_17 |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 15:59 | 81,281 | -122 |
| 13 Nov 2026, 11:19 | 81,403 | no change |
| 13 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 81,403 | -169 |
| 13 Nov 2026, 00:09 | 81,572 | -19 |
| 12 Nov 2026, 20:54 | 81,591 | -27 |
| 12 Nov 2026, 16:11 | 81,618 | -787 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 13:21 | 82,405 | no change |
| 11 Nov 2026, 12:56 | 82,405 | -39 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 11:34 | 82,444 | -284 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:37 | 82,728 | no change |
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:11 | 82,728 | -5 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 20:59 | 82,733 | -5 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 20:48 | 82,738 | -35 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 16:37 | 82,773 | -63 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 10:36 | 82,836 | -535 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:05 | 83,371 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 16:00 | 83,371 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 15:09 | 83,371 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 83,371 | -46 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 09:49 | 83,417 | first reading |
245 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 229 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 245 (8 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 83,210 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 23:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 234 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
221 reactions across 115 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 100 | 45.2% | |
| ❤ | 87 | 39.4% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 5.88% | |
| 🤷♂ | 12 | 5.43% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.905% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 0.905% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.905% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 0.905% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.452% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 245 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 245 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wx_17. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 245 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
谋生的路上大家都很辛苦 只是都没有说而已 因为眼里有盼头心里有希望
❤1👍1
路其实早就走歪了 是我非要看自己能走多远
👍2
你想得到一个东西 你就要拿一个东西献祭给老天 你想要的越多 你要献给老天的筹码就要越大
👍2❤1
妈 等我把欠的账处理干净了就回家 以前你们总是说让我好好存钱 我总是装听不见 实际上我在把我之前欠的所有债务都快还清了 你们老问我钱到底去哪里了 可是我不敢说 总是找借口 我也考虑过很多事情 有人风生水起 有人平平淡淡 有人无恶不作 我只是走错了一些路 做错了一些事情 要是之前听你们的 我也可以平平淡淡的生活#明天会更好
👍4
#VIP广告【汇盈娱乐城】 🎉 汇盈娱乐 始终坚持“用户至上,专业为本的运营理念力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技 😂😂😂😂↘️↘️↘️↘️↘️↘️↘️ ⚡首存最高送14888+,3倍 ⚡新用户专属,首周包赔20% ⚡亏损不担心,每日最高补 5999 ⚡月福利每月3号全站发放88888 ⚡️庄闲一念间,好彩天天送 18888 ⚡电子爆百倍以上即可领取奖励彩金最高 8888 ⚡挑战全网最高首存赠送比例!首存多少就送多少!不为赚钱只为交朋友!真实有效无套路!注:体育不参与此活动! 😆😆😆😆 😂🥰 😗💵 ⚡️ @okpay 上分秒 支持多种三方钱包上下分,方便快捷 ⚡战绩与更多福利 @hydilireba ⚡USDT/ RMB 双币种自由选择 😀USDT投注 👉: www.hy881.me 😀人民币投注👉 : hy881.me ➡️联系专员 @hydilireba ➡️联系助理 @hyxiao…
👍2
思想深度不断拔高 代价却是把自己推进孤独的牢笼
❤1👍1
你天生就是游荡漂泊的人 早过惯了有今天没有明天的生活 本就不应该有所牵挂 更不应该让任何人在身上找寄托
👍1
她是空的 要先往里面装温饱 装金钱 装安全感 装喜怒哀乐 装做错事的自由 装永远可退的后路 装很多很多 装满了才能有空隙感受到爱
👍1
强者不断的重塑自己认知 弱鸡始终坚持自己的认知
👍1
生活既要尽心 也要随心 既要决心 也要开心
👍1
我想变成一个很淡的人 淡到任何人和关系都伤害不了我
👍1
不是我选错了,是命运指引着我走向了现在这条路
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 245 posts we hold for @wx_17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 72 posts on @wx_17 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wx_17 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Emo电台素材文案馆” (@wx_17), 81,281 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wx_17.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.