Omanyi okutambula nzeka.. okuva wali eNatete, paka eNamuswa?!! Nkuwulila.. Nae, nga lwaki toyimiliza ntambula?? Zilina we zituka ne zikoma. Yingini zisilika zooka. Eh! Nae omaze n'otuka. #embozi #nga #bwakakya!

Channel
JWL // literature
@wwwrite
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002018117225 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wwwrite |
| Description | A place on The Internet, where we come to read the author we know and enjoy. Especially featuring the written creative & scholarly works of Joseph Willrich Lutalo C.M.R.W. Bsc. Msc. (PhD pending). |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wwwrite |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 7 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 217.9%
- avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15.3
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (22 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 122 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 318
- Videos
- 26
- Links
- 111
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 17m 35s
- Average length
- 5m 52s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🤞🟢🌏✨✨📚 REAP 2026 International Conference has officially kickedoff and is open to the whole wide world! Among presentations to watch out for is East Africa's luminary and the Internet's best friend.. https://reap.byu.edu/joseph-willrich-lutalo-ipow-building-a-transnational-creative-publishing-platform-from-the-margins/ #happeningnow #reap2026 #provoutah #conferences #literaryworld
Here's a bonus treat for those closely following.. Listen. The aethyrs whistle, The valleys stand still As I recount Dead Montessori Kanyike's tales. There dwells the mystifying three, So he said. Underneath an oak tree, They are a treat. Kinsmen? Legion of Martyrs? Or triplets bound? A camaraderie, dear wanderer. Retreating in a theater without heat. Therein, the spirit of that tree. Tell me then, Obscurer Than …
SIXTEEN Tee Ties EXIST --------------------------[+]-------------------------- Is an extended setian lyric poem by JWL With Light (I*POW; t.me/ipowriters) with the real transformatics property; Apart from punctuation symbols, all words must themselves be legit English vocabulary N' strictly only span subsequences of the source natural symbol sequence; {E, E, I, N, S, T, X} in this case. See Tin Nets Sit Set. Se…
REAP 2026 @ Provo, UTAH // I*POW Conference Presentation & Slides on 6 AUG (2AM EAT) 🔴 youtu.be/RR_9yxdSlyQ These are the official presentation slides as well as their live presentation by I*POW Editor-in-Chief, Fut. Prof. J'Willrich Lutalo a Ugandan author, inventor and founder of Nuchwezi. This presentation is a last minute alternative to an originally planned live presentation after the conference programme got…
✨💯 ALERT! ALERT! ALERT! 💯✨ Dear Friends and Community members that especially wished to participate in or follow the I*POW (International Internet Portfolio of Writers) presentation session (Background REAP 26 Paper: Lutalo, Joseph Willrich, I*POW: Building a Transnational Creative Publishing Platform from the Margins (July 22, 2026). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7167141 or http://dx.doi.org/10.213…
A: to Z: of ACM SLE Since 2008 — towards discovery of a modern programming language by Joseph Willrich Lutalo C.M.R.W SYNOPSIS: This book compiles a chronological critical review of 26 ACM SLE papers on Software Languages, carefully selected for their influence on the design and implementation of TEA—the Transforming Executable Alphabet—a modern minimalist language for general-purpose programming. DRAFT-DATE: 4 AUG…
Beauty many times likewise inspires horror! 🙌🤣 And so, in this triple posting, choose for yourself just one of three carefully chosen beautiful pieces of art sourced from #deviantart We hope they likewise serve well to inspire the spirit of awe, exploration and wonder in many of you freaky netizens 💪😆💥💥⚡ #wallpapers #digitalart #cinematic
I*POW EIC // Ready 400 REAP '26 🟢⚡🙌💥🌏📚🏆✨ https://youtube.com/shorts/RNcTirEGxKo Go Watch/Listen to Nobel Laureate..
Thanks For All The Great Work.
Associated #songart
REAP 2026 I*POW Talkshow (PART 2-3) by I*POW Media 🔴 https://youtu.be/qP8sYZhWl04 🟢 https://t.me/ipowriters/415 is the final part of a special talkshow presenting the official conference paper introducing the International Internet Portfolio of Writers to the world: 💡⚡ t.me/ipowriters/400 Note that, this edition, despite being the final talkshow for the paper, and yet, it only covers Sections (3*): Origins, P…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @wwwrite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 533,988 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JWL // literature” (@wwwrite), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wwwrite.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.