Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WWD Montes Claros

Channel

WWD Montes Claros

@wwdmontesclaros

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001539333958
TypeChannel
Username@wwdmontesclaros
Created18 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wwdmontesclaros

Growth

2628278 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28 subscribers8 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 02:1328+1
16 Aug 2026, 21:5227+1
11 Aug 2026, 08:3326no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:3126first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 14s
Average length
2m 15s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍250.0%
👏125.0%
😱125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2023 to 17 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jan 2024, 12:53 UTC641 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @karinamichelinnews

Wall Street Journal relata que os médicos estão “alarmados e perplexos” por que o câncer está explodindo entre os jovens americanos. “É provável que seja alguma mudança ambiental, seja algo na nossa alimentação, nos nossos medicamentos ou algo que ainda não identificamos” - disse uma médica... Será mesmo?? https://karinamichelin.locals.com/upost/5136885/title

👍2

13 Jan 2024, 02:27 UTC565 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @reacoesadversasVideo

Video, posted without a caption

😱1

12 Jan 2024, 22:31 UTC288 viewsread 11 August 2026

Isso é o pior verme imundo do chorume do lixo. Não nos vencerá JAMAIS!

12 Jan 2024, 22:31 UTC372 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @ocachaceiroVideo

Abril/2023 @ocachaceiro fala de seus planos para 2024

12 Jan 2024, 00:59 UTC225 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

15 “Teorias da conspiração” da COVID que se revelaram verdadeiras: #15 – Injeções repetidas de COVID enfraquecem o sistema imunológico, de acordo com estudo. #14 – A ivermectina funcionou! Estudo revisado por pares encontra redução de 74% no excesso de mortes. #13 - Os não vacinados foram usados ​​como bode expiatório pelo fracasso das vacinas contra a COVID, conclui o estudo. #12 - Os usuários de máscaras pa

12 Jan 2024, 00:52 UTC156 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @karinamichelinnewsPhoto

FAKE NEWS!!! O Ministério da Saúde brasileiro continua disseminando fake news, negando a própria bula da Pfizer e omitindo os estudos que provam o contrário.

11 Jan 2024, 10:55 UTC120 viewsread 11 August 2026

Hoje foi o segundo dia de testemunho do Dr Anthony Fauci no Subcomitê de Investigação do Coronavírus do Congresso Americano. Sob juramento, o discurso mudou muito. Vejam os principais pontos do depoimento dele: 1.O Dr. Fauci afirmou que a recomendação de distanciamento social de “6 pés de distância” promovida pelas autoridades federais de saúde provavelmente não se baseava em nenhum dado. "Simplesmente apareceu." Di

9 Jan 2024, 23:42 UTC89 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

VACINA DA DENGUE Você conhece os dois imunizantes? Recebo perguntas diariamente sobre isso. A principal dúvida é, qual tomar?! Me diga aqui, você conhecia os dois imunizantes?

9 Jan 2024, 14:14 UTC101 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @MPVC19oficial

https://medicospelavidacovid19.com.br/noticias/maioria-dos-norte-americanos-ja-esta-preocupada-com-a-seguranca-da-vacina-contra-a-covid-19-revela-pesquisa/

8 Jan 2024, 18:25 UTC77 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @reacoesadversasPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

7 Jan 2024, 21:55 UTC78 viewsread 11 August 2026

Os pesquisadores SE RETRATARAM do estudo que disse que a Hidroxicloroquina não poderia ser usada contra a COVID por ser perigosa. "um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid-19 submetidos à hidroxicloroquina" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31174-0/fulltext

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wwdmontesclaros. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WWD Montes Claros” (@wwdmontesclaros), 28 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wwdmontesclaros.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.