Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 缅甸日记 |吃瓜新闻🍉 (东南亚新闻)

Channel

缅甸日记 |吃瓜新闻🍉 (东南亚新闻)

@wuyagx

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11,879subscribers

+9,148 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002327060453
TypeChannel
Username@wuyagx
Description#东南亚 #菲律宾 #越南 #老挝 #柬埔寨 #泰国 #缅甸 #体育 #博彩 #代理 欢迎大家来到缅甸日记吃瓜新闻 商务合作爆料:@hlm1208
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/wuyagx

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 16 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@azzxx8848/131926 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC@wuyagx/3055 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC1.0012 hours
@azzxx8848/131956 Nov 2026, 15:21 UTC@wuyagx/3056 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC1.0012 hours
@azzxx8848/131966 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC@wuyagx/3057 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC1.0011 hours
@azzxx8848/131987 Nov 2026, 02:01 UTC@wuyagx/3058 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC1.0067 minutes
@azzxx8848/131997 Nov 2026, 02:20 UTC@wuyagx/3059 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC1.0049 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@azzxx88485 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 hours@azzxx8848 (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 33 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 16 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ui99uuppuuuuuhlksiiwojjx. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 16 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,70612,3597,532.57 August 2026 — 2,731 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,731 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,732 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,729 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,727 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,725 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,724 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,722 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,721 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,719 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,717 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,715 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,714 subscribers28 September 2026 — 2,706 subscribers5 October 2026 — 12,359 subscribers10 October 2026 — 12,332 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,300 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,289 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,274 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,239 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,235 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,231 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,230 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,228 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,203 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,193 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,182 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,171 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,168 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,153 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,146 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,142 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,130 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,124 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,113 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,112 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,071 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,041 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,022 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,014 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,986 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,954 subscribers10 November 2026 — 11,901 subscribers12 November 2026 — 11,879 subscribers11,8797 August 202612 November 2026
44 measurements spanning 97 days, net +9,148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,258–13,807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 07:1611,879-22
10 Nov 2026, 08:0011,901-53
8 Nov 2026, 20:2611,954-32
7 Nov 2026, 12:0811,986-28
6 Nov 2026, 08:3812,014-8
5 Nov 2026, 07:5812,022-19
4 Nov 2026, 07:3812,041-30
3 Nov 2026, 07:5612,071-41
2 Nov 2026, 05:3612,112-1
1 Nov 2026, 04:4812,113-11
31 Oct 2026, 04:1712,124-6
30 Oct 2026, 04:0712,130-12
29 Oct 2026, 05:3612,142-4
28 Oct 2026, 00:1512,146-7
26 Oct 2026, 23:0412,153-15
26 Oct 2026, 01:3812,168-3
25 Oct 2026, 05:0712,171-11
24 Oct 2026, 07:5412,182-11
23 Oct 2026, 09:2712,193-10
22 Oct 2026, 10:5712,203first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.042%
avg views ÷ 11,879 subscribers
Avg views / post
4.9
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held39 (13 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total74
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 21:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,980
Videos
≈672
Links
≈603

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 17s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC5 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#泰国 警方搜查蓬潘达丈夫住所 帐篷内查获被帆布遮盖两辆无牌豪车 2026年11月6日,泰国经济犯罪打击部门持搜查令,前往巴吞他尼府农色县空6阿提普住所搜查,大门紧锁,等候一小时后女佣持钥匙开门。院内帐篷下,白色奔驰、黑色宝马被蓝白防水布盖住,两车均无车牌,宝马车顶堆放矿泉水遮挡车身。警方拍照留证,核查车架号与车辆权属。同日清晨蓬潘达在曼谷被捕,被控诈骗公众、洗钱等罪名,阿提普涉嫌共同洗钱,目前仍在逃。 这两辆豪车的资金来源将是重点核查方向,警方持续追查涉案资产,同步追捕阿提普,厘清善款与涉案财物之间的关联。

7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC4 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#泰国 清迈霍县扫毒行动抓获贩毒嫌疑人 当场查获1514粒疯药还涉海洛因吸食 2026年11月4日13时,清迈霍县警方开展辖区禁毒清查行动,成功逮捕一名毒贩,现场起获1514粒疯药,也就是甲基苯丙胺片剂。嫌疑人被查出持有毒品并有贩卖意图,同时他自行承认吸食海洛因。警方以非法持有并分销一类毒品、吸食海洛因两项罪名对其提起指控,嫌疑人连同全部毒品证物一并移交办案人员,依照泰国相关法律开展后续调查处置。 毒品危害巨大,当地持续推进常态化扫毒清查,堵截毒品向外扩散,守护辖区居民安全,警示民众远离各类毒品不要以身试法。

7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC4 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#泰国 警方清晨抓捕做好事基金会蓬潘达 近十亿善款流向普吉别墅项目遭追查 2026年11月6日清晨6时26分,泰国经济犯罪打击部门在曼谷邦甲区住宅村逮捕蓬潘达,她正和律师准备接受采访。警方持法院逮捕令,同步搜查四处地点,追查其丈夫阿提普,但对方下落不明。基金会自2019年以来资金流水近10亿泰铢,共180万笔交易,有2亿泰铢善款转入蓬潘达、阿提普个人账户,其中四千五百多万泰铢被用来在普吉修建豪华泳池别墅,另有1200万泰铢被提取现金。蓬潘达被控诈骗、洗钱等罪名。 善款本该用于公益救助,如今被曝出流向私人豪宅建设,警方持续追捕阿提普,深挖整条资金链路,厘清每一笔款项的真实去向。

7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC2 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#泰国 警方清晨抓捕蓬潘达 同步搜查多处地点丈夫阿提依旧在逃 2026年11月6日清晨,经济犯罪打击部门持刑事法院逮捕令,在曼谷邦甲区住宅村抓获做好事基金会主席蓬潘达,当时她正和律师准备接受媒体采访,全程配合搜查。警方一共搜查四处点位,包含蓬潘达居所、丈夫阿提在巴吞他尼的住所、基金会工地等,阿提的住处已经布控搜寻,但并未找到他。蓬潘达被控诈骗公众、洗钱、违反计算机犯罪法,阿提涉共同洗钱,警方冻结十余账户、查封资产,本案还有无证募捐的独立控告,蓬潘达此前已经致歉,二人尚未定罪。 慈善捐款案件牵动大众目光,警方一边讯问蓬潘达一边持续追捕阿提,多方线索并行核查,静待完整资金调查结果。

7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC2 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#泰国 曼谷清晨执行逮捕令 蓬潘达准备受访时被拘并同步多处搜查 2026年11月6日清晨6时28分,中央调查警察在曼谷邦甲必区住宅区向蓬潘达出示逮捕令,当时她正和私人律师准备接受媒体采访,还未受访便被带回住宅搜查。警方同步搜查她丈夫阿提在巴吞他尼的住所、做好事组织基金会以及在建神庙等多处地点收集证据,之后将蓬潘达带回中央调查警察总部讯问。逮捕令由刑事法院5日核发,蓬潘达被控诈骗公众、洗钱、违反计算机法,丈夫涉嫌共同洗钱,警方已冻结账户、查封资产,案件源于洪灾捐款被质疑挪用的风波。 慈善募捐资金必须专款专用,这起备受关注的基金会贪腐案持续取证,警方会完整核查资金流向,依靠证据作出公正的法律判定。

7 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC1 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#泰国 芭提雅公寓端掉跨国电诈团伙 泰中8人落网涉案损失超1亿泰铢 2026年11月5日消息,泰国第二警区侦查部门联合反网络诈骗中心持搜查令,突击芭提雅市中心公寓,抓获5名泰籍、3名中国籍嫌疑人。该团伙非法买卖银行卡、SIM卡,利用账户接收诈骗赃款,还借助多家数字资产平台转移资金洗白收益,现场查获存折、银行卡、手机电脑等大批作案工具,另外起获2.71克冰毒。8人被控出借账户协助犯罪、涉毒等罪名,案件关联全国多起诈骗,警方持续追查其余涉案人员。 买卖银行卡、虚拟货币洗钱都是重罪,电诈链条分工复杂,警方持续深挖资金链路,严厉打击跨境诈骗与赃款洗白的违法活动。

4 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC1 viewsread 14 November 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作(二选一): 1、打码返佣,限指定平台; 2、占成模式,可自由选择占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,3000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获193万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U,一注直接…

3 Nov 2026, 06:28 UTC3 viewsread 14 November 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作(二选一): 1、打码返佣,限指定平台; 2、占成模式,可自由选择占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,3000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获193万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U,一注直接…

1 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC9 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#东帝汶新闻:东帝汶,正走在柬埔寨和缅甸的老路上 近日,有组织犯罪和腐败报道项目(OCCRP)发布报道称,由于惩戒乏力与司法漏洞,东盟新晋成员东帝汶境内电诈活动日益增多,该国正走在柬埔寨和缅甸的老路上。 报道称,由于缺乏专项立法与司法经验,在东帝汶被捕的多数外籍电诈嫌犯在仅缴纳2500至10000美元罚款后即可获释并重操旧业,部分人已被捕并定罪多次。 报道还拿上月首都帝力查获的一起电诈案件作为例子,18名外籍嫌犯中,14人在交纳3000美元罚款后获释,而另外4人被撤诉。报道指出,相比于电诈集团在亚太地区每年超过千亿美元的收益,这微薄的罚款毫无威慑力。 自今年7月以来,东帝汶警方已逮捕448名涉诈人员(包括211名中国籍和181名印尼籍),查获62套星链终端。不过,由于东帝汶执法部门间缺乏协同,现行法律亦难以高效定罪,这对遏制当地日益泛滥的电诈犯罪活动效果有限。 联合国毒品和犯罪问题办公室在一份报告中指出:“东帝汶美元化…

1 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC11 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚新闻:古晋突击⚡处地点!74名外国人被捕,两处场所疑涉网络诈骗! 马来西亚砂拉越州古晋,10月15日至16日,移民局展开 Ops Mahir 与 Ops Sapu 联合执法行动,突击检查8处住宅、排屋及出租房间。 最值得关注的是,其中两处场所涉嫌涉及网络诈骗! 执法人员现场查扣电脑及手机,进一步调查是否涉及诈骗活动。 📌 行动结果: 🔴 79人接受检查,74人被捕 🇮🇩 印尼籍:63人 🇨🇳 中国籍:10人 🇰🇭 柬埔寨籍:1人 被捕者包括45名男性及29名女性。 此次行动由30名移民局执法人员执行。目前,当局尚未公布两处疑涉诈骗场所的具体运作方式及涉案人员详情。74人落网,10名中国籍人员在列,两处场所疑涉网络诈骗!后续调查是否会揭开更多内情,值得关注。

1 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC8 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#泰国新闻:罗勇府突袭四家无证KTV 涉嫌提供卖淫服务 今天凌晨,泰国内政部副部长率队突击检查位于罗勇府普拉克登区的四家KTV(包括情人KTV、星威KTV、World Party及君悦KTV)。初步调查显示,四家场所均未取得娱乐场所营业执照,其中两家涉嫌非法卖淫。 执法人员指出,部分场所主要面向中国顾客,提供私密包厢、女服务员及高价酒水,并发现有越南籍女子在现场提供服务。警方目前正在追查经营者、招募者及幕后资助者,并调查是否有公职人员涉案。

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @wuyagx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“缅甸日记 |吃瓜新闻🍉 (东南亚新闻)” (@wuyagx), 11,879 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wuyagx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.