Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 海外大事件

Channel

海外大事件

@baoguang1188

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

383subscribers

-183 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001626368455
TypeChannel
Username@baoguang1188
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/baoguang1188

Growth

383566474.516 August 2026 — 566 subscribers16 August 2026 — 566 subscribers17 August 2026 — 547 subscribers25 August 2026 — 492 subscribers1 September 2026 — 383 subscribers16 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net -183. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 356–593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 17:35383-109
25 Aug 2026, 01:33492-55
17 Aug 2026, 14:19547-19
16 Aug 2026, 19:15566no change
16 Aug 2026, 19:00566first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.522%
avg views ÷ 383 subscribers
Avg views / post
2.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held14 (13 June 202616 August 2026)
Views total2
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 36s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC2 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuai?start=a_36NH7CM

22 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC56 viewsread 16 August 2026
Video

美女帮男朋友在马路边打飞机被警察叔叔发现教育了!笑死

22 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC37 viewsread 16 August 2026
Video

这种奶子手感应该是好的不得了啊! #大奶子 #巨乳

22 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC34 viewsread 16 August 2026
Video

他是想让我吃火锅还是吃奶子?下垂了! #奶子

18 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC47 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#泰国新闻 前女婿盗窃前岳母10泰铢黄金及数万现金落网 称“钱不够花” 2026年7月15日 泰国叻丕府波塔拉姆县警方根据线索 在一处度假村逮捕27岁嫌疑人肯姆 此前警方接获其前岳母报案称 家中一条重10泰铢的金项链及14000泰铢现金失窃 经查看监控确认嫌疑人身份 警方随后在度假村将其抓获 并起获全部赃物 嫌疑人供认盗窃理由是“钱不够花 需要支付开销及探望子女费用” 小编说两句:孩子要看 开销要付 难道偷前岳母就能解决问题?这理由听着都替你觉得丢人

18 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC43 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#泰国新闻 呵叻府大学宿舍四楼坠下22岁女子 目击者称事发前曾听到争吵 2026年7月15日晚7时05分 泰国呵叻府直辖县一所知名大学后方宿舍楼 一名22岁女子从约15米高四楼坠落身受重伤 送医时仍有生命体征 情况危殆 伤者来自黎逸府 非该校学生 事发前曾前往探望好友 目击者称约下午6时30分曾听到楼内两名女子发生争吵 随后伤者即坠落 警方正对目击者及伤者好友进行问询 调查事件具体原因 小编说两句:四楼坠下 重伤昏迷 几声争吵之后 人已躺在血泊中 真相不能只靠猜测 需要警方给出交代

15 Jun 2026, 10:26 UTC219 viewsread 16 August 2026

✅狗推DJ @DJmvp ✅东南亚包厢DJ @yinyue1688 ✅素材套图 @sucaia99 ✅吃瓜ღ猎奇 @chigua6622 ✅抖音网红 @wanghong3322 ✅飞机号=成品号批发 @TGhao18 ✅糖心VOL 麻豆传媒 @tangxin01 ✅探花系列|国产偷拍 @tanhuaav8 ✅日本女优作品精选 @ribenAV168168 ✅海外大事件 @baoguang1188 ✅东南亚曝光大事件 @baoguang6687

13 Jun 2026, 06:09 UTC206 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#泰国新闻 素叻他尼府高速追缉破获大型毒品案:查获冰毒137万粒及30公斤,逮捕2人,1车在逃 泰国警方在素叻他尼府41号公路沿线布控,成功拦截一辆丰田卡罗拉轿车,逮捕39岁司机纳罗帕西及32岁老挝籍妻子文萨瓦。另一辆本田雅阁轿车加速逃逸后弃车,车上人员逃跑。警方在逃逸车内查获9袋毒品,共计137万3,800粒冰毒及30公斤冰毒。被逮捕的司机供认负责为毒品运输车队开道,每次报酬约5,000泰铢,此前已多次参与。警方正追捕在逃人员及幕后组织者。

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @baoguang1188. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,368,488 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“海外大事件” (@baoguang1188), 383 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguang1188.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.