Conspiración: de la disonancia a la fascinación – Entrevista a Wu Ming 1 ¿Qué son los «núcleos de verdad» de las fantasías de la conspiración? ¿A qué necesidades responden y qué emociones suscitan? Traducimos hoy una entrevista al escritor y miembro del colectivo Wu Ming en la que reflexiona sobre cómo desmantelar este tipo de narraciones tóxicas —sucedáneos de la crítica al sistema—, intentando sustituir el estupo…

Channel
Wu Ming Foundation Polyglot Channel
@wumingfoundationpolygot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
737subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001811674918 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wumingfoundationpolygot |
| Description | Formerly known as Luther Blissett. A band of writers based in Bologna, IT. Authors of Q and many other books. Multilanguage updates on our activities. https://www.wumingfoundation.com/giap/wu-ming-who-we-are-the-things-we-do/ |
| Created | 27 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wumingfoundationpolygot |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 737 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 737 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.6%
- avg views ÷ 737 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 152
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 June 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 152 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 7
- Links
- 79
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
We apologize for the following inconvenience: we’ve had to temporarily disable Giap’s internal search engine because, in recent days, it has been overwhelmed by AI bots intent on scraping content. A metastasis of fake searches—hundreds per hour—originating from a swarm of U.S. IP addresses. They were overloading the server and causing slowdowns and disruptions for human users. AI has grown into a cancer at every leve…
Complot : de la dissonance cognitive à la fascination Entretien avec Wu Ming 1 Extrait du dernier numéro de la revue Culture & Démocratie (n° 62), « Mensonges ! » Cet entretien est aussi disponible dans sa version originale en italien.
El caso del Hantavirus o cómo desenterrar los recuerdos del covid A pesar de las enormes diferencias a todos los niveles, la difusión del Hantavirus en un crucero ha reactivado en la psique colectiva recuerdos y sensaciones de la pandemia. La difusión global de SARS-CoV-2 a partir de finales de 2019 desencadenó una serie de fenómenos sociales y políticos que, en gran parte, siguen desarrollándose hoy en día; cambio…
Más allá de las pantallas: escritura, IA y resistencias tecnológicas «Ante un escenario tan inquietante, ¿qué espacio queda para pensar y construir un presente y un futuro distintos? […] El primer paso, más necesario que nunca, es construir una gran alfabetización digital crítica, desde abajo, desde nuestras vivencias y desde la alienación que todas y todos vivimos. Ante el enorme poder económico y político de los …
«"En primer lugar, queremos aclarar que hablar de ovnis nunca es sólo hablar de ovnis. Siempre hay algo más de por medio...". Recibo este mensaje en un archivo de texto adjunto en un correo electrónico. Proviene del otro lado del planeta. El remitente no es una persona sino una voz colectiva identificada como Wu Ming que, en chino, significa anónimo. Recibí el archivo hace más de dos meses. Lo he leído varias veces …
Derechas, dinero y conspiraciones en los papeles de Epstein. Segunda parte «El mundo que vemos en los papeles de Epstein no es horrendo únicamente por los abusos sexuales. Es horrendo el sistema que reproduce esa clase, una clase global de superpatrones que se creen una raza aparte, que prosperan sobre la exclusión y la desigualdad, que derrochan y contaminan usando jets privados con la desenvoltura de quien se sube…
On UFO 78, the Italian Seventies, Imperialist Wars and Space Flight: The Lost Mexican Interview In 2025 the Spanish edition of our novel UFO 78 – published by Anagrama with the title Ovni 78 – was distributed in several Latin American countries, including Argentina, Chile, Mexico and Uruguay. In January 2026 we gave an interview to a Mexican news website. We received the questions in written form, there was a huge l…
Derechas, dinero y conspiraciones en los papeles de Epstein, primera parte Wu Ming 1 Quienes mantenían relaciones con Epstein eran, sobre todo, extremistas de derechas, partidarios de pseudociencias racistas, tecnorreaccionarios de Silicon Valley y representantes varios del trumpismo, incluidos representantes de la actual administración. https://www.elsaltodiario.com/extrema-derecha/derechas-dinero-conspiraciones-…
Notes sur la littérature et l'intelligence artificielle (et sur les corps, à partir de polémiques récentes) Wu Ming 1 sur Lundi Matin https://lundi.am/Notes-sur-la-litterature-et-l-intelligence-artificielle
Notas sobre literatura e inteligencia artificial y sobre los cuerpos, a partir de polémicas recientes [Mientras escribía la segunda parte de mi “portulano” Trescientos noventa y cuatro días [relato del tour de presentaciones del libro Gli uomini pesce, inédito en castellano, N. del T.] (aquí la primera parte), algunas reflexiones mías sobre lugares, cuerpos y escritura reaccionaron con polémicas recientes sobre lite…
Did the article on the "train of shame" go off the rails? Italian Wikipedia faces historical and political controversy For eighteen years, the Italian Wikipedia has hosted an article about an infamous political incident that, actually, might not have happened at all, at least according to a report by fact-checking group Nicoletta Bourbaki. Inspired by the French mathematicians who went under the Nicolas Bourbaki pse…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wumingfoundationpolygot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wu Ming Foundation Polyglot Channel” (@wumingfoundationpolygot), 737 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wumingfoundationpolygot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.