来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢韩国通道-韩国支付-韩国... 📢新葡京新澳门赌场新盛赌场 📢线上百家乐 在线百家乐 ... 📢新世界新世界娱乐新世界现... 📢欧博百家乐 亚星百家乐 ... 📢台灣達人秀娱乐吃瓜八卦美... 📢东南亚今日头条新盛娱乐 ... 📢爱看影视 📢xVideos免费成人视... 📢名人物语 📢果子 📢勾引,野战,车震 📢奇怪的仙人掌|灵异|恐怖 📢ins引流/ins群发系... 📢利博代理 利博官网 利博... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 📢⚽️注册送138🧧百家乐/棋牌/电竞体育信誉平台 🥇西湖娱乐城✅老品牌包出款✅出款超10亿U 📢⚽️爱博体育-佣金55%-玩家首存即升VIP7等级⚽️ 📢东南亚今日头条|新闻|爆料|悬赏|通缉|吃瓜缅甸妙瓦底大揭 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员,即可

Channel
韩国女团|妩媚性感|模特|外围
@wumeixinggan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
180subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002195405491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wumeixinggan |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wumeixinggan |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 180 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 181 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 181 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.9%
- avg views ÷ 180 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 26.8
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 April 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 107 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wumeixinggan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 572,075 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@AG111_1 · 71 post素人無碼外流討論組
@av61715 · 351 post小雪深圳高端外围
@az1199920 · 631 postPA百家乐包赢技巧-内幕稳赢平台-电子棋牌彩票.百家乐技术-专业代打
@dunk123888 · 551 post福布斯代理 福布斯官网 福布斯百家乐 福布斯真人
@fubusi1a · 61 post欧博平台 亚星平台 亚星真人 欧博真人
@huangguan1x · 51 post利博官网 利博代理 利博私网 利博百家乐
@libo0888 · 8051 post菲律賓上門 馬卡提上門 馬尼拉上門 BGC上門
@manilamakatiyuenan · 301 post群呼数据|网贷数据|助贷数据|短信拦截|DPI|SDK|数据源头
@mm365521 · 901 post线上百家乐 在线百家乐 百家乐真人 真人百家乐
@oubo2y · 51 post欧博平台 亚星平台 欧博真人 亚星真人
@oubog1 · 51 post环球360代理 环球360官网 环球360私网 环球私网
@oubohuiyuan · 51 post环球360代理 环球360官网 环球360私网 环球私网
@oubosiwang188 · 51 post资源
@pddsjzy · 41 post皇冠私网🅰️亚星私网🅰️欧博私网🅰️万利私网🅰️百家乐正网私网1:1
@siwangbaosha141 · 41 post全球接码平台- 180 多个国家虚拟号码的平台
@SMSActivate123 · 2181 postTG 中文【资源精选】
@TG_ZhongWenSheQu · 411 post万利平台 PA平台 万利真人 PA真人
@wanlidailia · 61 post轻小说屋
@wsxpk_n · 461 post环球国际-新盛赌场平台
@xm72582 · 81 post环球360代理 环球360官网 线上百家乐 环球360私网
@yaxing311 · 71 post欧博包赢 亚星包赢 欧博杀猪 亚星杀猪
@yaxingd1 · 91 post欧美猎奇国产性虐调教
@yrtfdf11 · 61 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@TeleTopOrg · 33,07818 posts爱博体育官方频道
@aibonbcom · 15,5722 posts速搜
@ssou · 216,8352 posts速搜❤️🔥流量互推/广告交易
@TonAdNews · 8,9532 postsN9九游会《AG亚游》官方
@CG5686 · 111 post台灣達人秀娱乐吃瓜八卦美女
@chiguabagua1 · 331 post新世界新世界娱乐新世界现场
@gfhsdg111 · 41 post果子
@guozi11 · 161 post韩国通道-韩国支付-韩国代收-韩国银行-韩国水房-韩国车队-韩国承兑-韩国账户
@hanguozhifu00 · 2001 post新葡京新澳门赌场新盛赌场
@hkghj11 · 61 post解读历史|回忆经典
@jiedulishi · 3391 post☁️开云体育官方🏆开云招商 匡
@kyzsklz · 48,7541 post3D福彩
@LAWAWD · 721 post利博代理 利博官网 利博百家乐 真人百家乐
@libo22t · 31 post皇冠私网🅱️皇冠登1🅱️皇冠登2🅱️皇冠登3
@longteng1846 · 81 postMaxPanel - 社媒增粉平台🚀
@MaxpanelCC · 18,1001 post名人物语
@mingrenwuyu · 581 post欧博代理 亚星代理 亚星假网 欧博假网
@oubo0066 · 101 post线上百家乐 在线百家乐 百家乐真人 真人百家乐
@oubo2s · 51 post趴赛修车 马卡提修车 马尼拉修车 马尼拉上门
@pasay46sggs · 1391 post奇怪的仙人掌|灵异|恐怖
@qiguaixrz · 681 post新盛赌场-缅甸赌场
@TWGJ0009 · 81 post亚星私网 欧博私网 亚星假网 欧博假网
@yaxing3777 · 81 postins引流/ins群发系统海外精准引流/游戏/币圈/交友/外汇/股票/商城/金融/仿牌
@zzyinliu002 · 1671 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@wumeixinggan named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“韩国女团|妩媚性感|模特|外围” (@wumeixinggan), 180 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wumeixinggan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.