Channel
@wuhan_baogao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
461subscribers
+144 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002419576547 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wuhan_baogao |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wuhan_baogao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 461 | +47 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 414 | +45 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 369 | +46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 323 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 317 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✍🏻️ 武汉档案馆|榜单导航 ✈️ t.me/wuhan_dangan 老师：艾琳 老师链接：https://telegram.me/wuhan_dangan/348 评价人：东逝水 总分区 评价等级：很喜欢😘 文字区 混个分哈哈 颜值中上，嫩妹，脸盘子稍圆，带妆颜值不算出挑，主要是化妆水平稀烂，约等于刚涂白的日本艺伎妆，还踏马没腮红。 身材上等，体态匀称，B+，和小锁类似的藏肉怪，看着不大，抓握饱满。青春期练过舞蹈，残留一点小功底 肤色偏白，肤质不错，成长条件应该属于优渥的类型，养的挺好 性格外放，擅聊，胡健雷老斧那个调调。热场期不太会亲昵，懂一点稚嫩人际交往，成长氛围有点东西，应该是商业类家庭，这个年龄段懂点人情世故已然出挑了！ 审美能力上等，有自己独特的审美观，细节推敲来自私人浴巾和中式肚兜情趣，目前见过自备情趣里面质感算上游的，没有…
✍🏻️ 武汉档案馆|榜单导航 ✈️ t.me/wuhan_dangan 老师：柠果 老师链接：https://telegram.me/wuhan_dangan/340 评价人：匿名提交 总分区 评价等级：心头肉😍 文字区 测试内容 无需关注 👥群聊 | t.me/wuhan_qun 👠上榜 | @dag9527_bot
❤1
武汉档案馆|榜单 t.me/wuhan_dangan 老师：零食_测试 评价人：匿名提交 总分区 评价等级：很喜欢 评价样本：1 条 文字区 二次测试 不用在意 群聊 | t.me/wuhan_qun 上榜 | @dag9527_bot
❤1
#武汉 档案馆报告参考模板 一、硬件:盘子/条子/肤子 Xxxxxxxxxx 二、软件:态度/服务态度 Xxxxxxxx 三、技术水平 Xxxxxxx 四、生理反馈 Xxxxxxxx啊啊啊爽啊 五、 最后加上其他一些你个人想发散或者发骚的话，随意，有没有都行。 🌰举个例子: 我有一个梦想，阿巴阿巴蹦擦擦♬ xxxxxxxxx之类的....... 基本就谋问题啦，尽量文字表达为主，数据流，字母流，星星流之类的你们自由发挥，记得注明范围
武汉档案馆🅐报告 pinned a photo
✍ 武汉档案馆 报告频道 启用 报告机器人 @whdagbot 使用说明: 点击进入机器人，点菜单，选择菜单列表的评价，按机器人引导提交评价 没有模板，自由发挥 如果非要一个模板，那就用那下面的参考一下，也是抄的别人的 ✍参考模板 点一哈 ✍投诉请联系先管理员，鸡毛蒜皮的小意外就蒜鸟，别拿着鸡毛当令箭。 报告言辞过于激烈且无法核实会被驳回，另外就是假的要死的好评也驳回收录，走点心谢谢，不行就给日过的狼友点优惠让别人好好写。 ⚠️报告要求提供出击证据， 照片或者截图 无证据图片报告被驳回概率大。 寥寥几个字的被驳回概率也大 群聊 t.me/wuhan_baogao 榜单 t.me/wuhan_dangan
潼潼 贵州妹子 人照一致，小个头，八十斤不到，但身材却十分有料，胸B,屁股圆润，胯比肩宽，后入十分带劲，可可爱爱，黄白皮肤； 慢热，性格比较拘谨，十分考虑别人的感受，害怕说错话，或者哪里做的不好得罪客人，聊开其实是个很可爱的女孩子； 态度很好，技能不多，口，69，🐍，口的时候会用舌头舔马眼，不知道啥时候停，全凭客人喊停，全程仍盘； 三点粉，紧，小穴包裹感强，女上给自己累的低血糖了，小脆皮，即使受不了也不知道拒绝，桩机手下留情； 大赚
泰妹 武昌 徐东 泰国妹，颜值中上，五官立体，面部整体干净细嫩，但脸颊有颗痣，人照相似度高，本人比照片更显稚嫩。 身材前凸后翘，四肢前戏，胸部臀部丰满，凹凸有致，身材接近于完美，胸围有C（带点科技属性），皮肤光滑无疤，身体紧实细腻，肤色稍深，一眼东南亚哪边的妹子。 老师性格非常外向，虽然蹩脚中文，但会不停简单沟通，行为语言也更多，从服务中就能看出非常之热爱，但没办法深入聊天，中文水平有限，如果时间够，用翻译软件的话，绝对是个非常能聊的女孩！ 服务顶级，前戏非常足，年龄不大，但技术丝毫不输一些服务系老师，感觉有经过专业培训的，口活也是整个含在嘴里，用舌头夹住不停吸吮，光嘴巴都有插进小穴的触感！ 日感优秀！小穴层次感很强，水量偏多，下体湿润的非常快，但叫床只会简单哼唧，配合度高，能主动，能配合，经验很足，很懂男人的舒适点在哪，体感很好。 总体…
阿似 东北妹 颜值算得上上等 人照一致 168，身材中上，胸C 且下垂，胸是暴瘦导致的皮肤松弛，有明显的生长纹，其他地方皮肤滑溜，每天有做保养， 大花腿有失美感； 传统印象中的东北人性格，大方得体，很能唠嗑，全程不冷场，有情绪价值； 服务两件套带洗澡，无🐍无69，乳交调情，会所流程，有简单培训过； 日感不错，水多，不耐造，体力较差，女上两分钟； 总结：颜值不错，情绪价值足，日感不错 600p 赚
柠果 推荐人反馈 看脸就觉得赚 颜值抗打，光看脸就能看几分钟，嫩，美，水灵！神似泰国女团明星。 身段标准，不高但胸挺腰细； 服务态度良好，微笑式服务，全程笑脸想陪伴； 服务参照课表，配合度高，不做作自然流露； 传教的时候会用脚勾着你的腰往自己里送，很猛的那种。。。两条腿能捆着你动弹不得，主要是边干边看脸，一吃一个不知声。 600 赚
南南 颜值中等，身材比例好，自然散发一种自带的荷尔蒙，皮肤光滑，性格温柔大方 对比老师来说环境很不错，安全性很高，不在几个开课集中点，服务热情，每一项都有细节，不会让你独处超过半分钟，床上主动，会问你喜好，即便是当天状态不好情况也是情绪价值拉满，会换位思考客人的角度，日感很好，床上表现力强，即便你很平淡，她依然风情万种，当天是大晚上去的活力依旧满满，全程压根不会有玩手机这种操作，可以说太懂男人了。。。
后湖小芯 简介:丰满美人，微胖大胸，如沐春风，细心体贴 正文: 场景一:初见佳人 推开门，妹妹躲在后面。跟着她穿过昏暗无光的门口，到了客厅才看清模样。19，20的年纪，妆容好像要去掉自己脸上的稚嫩。颜值并不算惊艳，可是越看越让人舒服，属于耐看型。 场景二:浴室准备 身材微胖，无明显赘肉。那丰盈的果实，肯定C➕，都快D了。皮肤偏白，不黑。光滑不粗糙，摸起来蛮舒服的。为人内敛慢热，做事有条不紊，耐心地放水帮洗帮擦。 场景三:床榻攻防 进入课室，物品摆放整齐，干净整洁，有点小温馨。开始前戏吃胸，丝丝呻吟声中藏不住眉眼的动情，如一趟春水般化开。动情之处身体开始乱动，把你的头越埋越深，真“埋胸杀”。 服务不错，以A面为主，任盘。用她的大胸在你的身上游走，不断地去挑逗你的兄弟，视觉效果拉满。有大蟒蛇和口b。 女上效果不错。翻身骑在身上，那傲人的白兔也不甘示弱地跳…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wuhan_baogao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“武汉日后感 | 档案馆™” (@wuhan_baogao), 461 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wuhan_baogao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.