Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

War thunder mobile conf

@wtm_conf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004310778603
TypeChannel
Username@wtm_conf
DescriptionКанал по wtm в котором можно будет увидеть отзывы о технике и обновлениях, сборы в игре и различное творчество по игре
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/wtm_conf

Growth

363736.56 August 2026 — 36 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:1637no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:4837+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:3336first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.6%
avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
Avg views / post
21.3
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total362
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
1
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC7 viewsread 10 August 2026

У них снова сервера страдают https://t.me/WarThunderMobileRu/1223

Signed David

9 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC10 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня утром у меня глюканул вт и все трасёры криво отображались

Signed David

8 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC11 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что не так на этих скринах?

Signed David

8 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC10 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

У меня вопрос, а как СБИВАТЬ самолёты, пожалуйста научите а то я за 2800 боёв не научился 🥺

Signed David

8 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026

И плюсом канал с модами на различные самолёты и ТАНКИ

Signed David

8 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026

По неизвестной для меня причине там в меня через какое-то время прилетает камикадзе что забавно

Signed David

8 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026

Кст, если хотите потренироваться летать на самолётах в wtm с помощью джойстика то рекомендую simpleplanes чтобы привыкнуть к управлению, там также есть оружие и можно будет потренироваться ещё и врагов посбивать

Signed David

7 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026

Только попробуйте задавать вопросы

Signed David

7 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💩1

Signed David

6 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC23 viewsread 10 August 2026

Интересно, а кто-то знает куда можно запихать Wiesel на картах чтобы противник не достал?

Signed David

2 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC31 viewsread 10 August 2026

Wtm это тот же wt только обрезанный: есть только аркада, рынка нет, нет всех веток (на данный момент только 5 веток есть и одна вкладка с "покидышами" которые не попали в ветки) и на этом оно не заканчивается но могу сказать что в будущем всё сделают, как минимум приведу в пример что везде было 3 ветки а сейчас в авиации 4 и в танках 5

Signed David

2 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

2 часть можно сказать

  1. 5/5 очень хорошо (играл)17%
  2. 4/5 хорошо (слышал но не играл)17%
  3. 3/5 средне ( иногда слышал)17%
  4. 2/5 плохо (слышал только название но не углублялся)0%
  5. 1/5 очень плохо ( не слышал вообще33%
  6. Я играл только в war thunder а об мобильной версии не слышал17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed David

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wtm_conf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

2 часть можно сказать

  1. 5/5 очень хорошо (играл)17%
  2. 4/5 хорошо (слышал но не играл)17%
  3. 3/5 средне ( иногда слышал)17%
  4. 2/5 плохо (слышал только название но не углублялся)0%
  5. 1/5 очень плохо ( не слышал вообще33%
  6. Я играл только в war thunder а об мобильной версии не слышал17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Это ладно, я думаю 99% процентов людей сюда пришло из-за розыгрыша

  1. Мне очень интересно13%
  2. Меня он интересует0%
  3. Немного интересно25%
  4. Меня он не интересует13%
  5. Меня он совсем не интересует38%
  6. Я скуф25%
  7. Я только об этой игре узнал(а) но меня она интересует0%
  8. Я только об этой игре узнал(а) но меня она не интересует13%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 429,163 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“War thunder mobile conf” (@wtm_conf), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wtm_conf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.