🎁 https://t.me/nft/DeskCalendar-71352

Channel
WTF СOIN TON
@wtf_coin_chat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
889subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002295167905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wtf_coin_chat |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wtf_coin_chat |
Topic
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 889 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 891 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 903 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 908 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 915 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 921 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 921 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 1 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 45s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
126 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 47 | 37.3% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 31.7% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 15.1% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 9.52% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.794% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 8 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Попробовали крафт подарков? 🎁 Desk Calendar • 🎁 Jingle Bells Можно использовать пока только на две модели подарков
🤣2❤1
🍬 To celebrate Telegram’s birthday and the summer holiday season, we’re dropping some limited-edition gifts within the next hour: Durov’s Sunglasses, Resistance Dog, Sandcastle, Surfboard and Pink Flamingo 🎁
Snoop Dogg выходит на Telegram Gifts! 🎁 Легендарный рэпер Snoop Dogg запускает свою коллекцию подарков в Telegram! На скрине — первые эксклюзивные дизайны уже засветились: лоу-райдеры, собаки в стиле хип-хоп, косяки, пакеты с золотом и фирменные "peace-hand" ✌️ 🌐 Telegram превращается в полноценную коллекционную платформу. А если сюда уже пришёл Snoop — дальше будет только жарче. 💬 Кто первым соберёт всю линейку —…
👍1🔥1🤣1
СТИКЕРЫ Telegram: когда никто не верил, а они... продаются за $300+ 😳 Ещё в декабре купил пак с пингвинами за 24 TON, чисто по фану, без особой надежды. Но время всё расставило по местам: 💥 Blue Pengu #680 проданы за 97.75 TON (~$332.35), а покупал их за 24 TON (~$77) Остальные тоже ушли быстро — 34.5 TON, 37.95 TON… Потратил на закуп 169 TON, а вывел 233 TON (+64 TON и еще продал на +48 TON) Оставил еще паки, ма…
❤5👍4🔥1😁1
📈 +55 TON за 1 зелье — рынок ЛЕТИТ? Или упадет? Вчера зелье Magic Potion стоило 78 TON… А сегодня уже продано за 134 TON 💥Разница: +55 TON прибыли на ровном месте! 🔥Сейчас рынок подарков снова оживает — рост заметен не только по зельям. Цены стремительно летят вверх — особенно у лимитированных моделей. ⚠️Но будьте внимательны: ❗️На волне FOMO можно легко купить по завышенной цене. Проверяйте историю сделок и фло…
❤7🔥3😁2👌1
🎁Торговать в Tonnel — это не просто выставить цену… Сегодня получил оффер на 🎁 Durov's Cap — я выставил за 1155 TON, а мне бот присылает предложение на... 1.095 TON 😳 👀 Смотрится почти одинаково, особенно на беглом взгляде. Но это не 1095, а 1.095 — просто Точка. Да-да, как в том анекдоте Василия Ивановича про НЮАНС: «Ситуация вроде бы одинаковая… Но есть один нюанс: у кого-то это часть плана, а у кого-то — сюр…
❤9👍2🔥2
🎁 Прикольная фича на MacBook Air Оказалось, что в Telegram на macOS можно сразу покупать по 2, 3… до 10 подарков за один клик! 😳 Просто выбираешь нужный множитель — и вперёд, на закупку. 🔥 Это прям спасение, когда: — Разлетаются соски за 4 минуты — Или хочешь быстро забрать редкие штуки, не кликая по одному. 📱 А вот на айфонах такой функции пока нет — там всё ещё только поштучно. Жаль, потому что во время хайпа на…
❤8👍2🔥1
🧸 А ты уже купил себе Toy Bear? Пока все раздумывают, команда @notmeme уже собрала 10 000 плюшевых медведей — и, судя по активности, никогда не продаст ✌️ 💬 Bulat Garipov прямо заявил: «Поднимем цену на мишек до небес! Все старые подарки продам, чтобы брать новых медведей. Просто ради фанa.» 🎯Цель? Сделать так, чтобы мишка стоил не 10–20 TON, а 100 или больше. Просто потому что могут. Просто чтобы стало весел…
🔥6❤3👍1
😮 Кажется, у @fuhao реально талант на покупку и продажу подарков 🎁 💵 Плюсовать на 🎁 Plush Pepe по +2600 TON и +3000 TON — это уже не удача, а системная торговля. 📈 Вот вам пример: — Купил Plush Pepe за 2550 TON, продал за 2610 TON — Другой купил за 2550 TON, продал уже за 2609 TON — И ещё один: купил за 2500 TON, а отдал за 3000 TON 💰 Пока кто-то холдит, он делает 3 сделки за 15 дней и копит TON, как будто торгует…
🔥7❤2👌1👍1
🎁 Light Sword трейдинг: воздух за TON? Даже если подарок заблокирован на 21 день — с ним можно зарабатывать. Проверено лично. Вот кейс⬇️ 🗓 31 мая купил два меча: • #37583 — за 36 TON • #33490 — за 35 TON 📈 1 июня и 5 июня — оба ушли на препродажу: • один за 48 TON • второй за 49 TON 🤑 Сейчас мне уже зачислили +1.8 TON за каждый меч как предварительную прибыль. нюансы: если первоначальные владельцы передадут мечи…
🔥6❤2👌1🤔1
❤️TON намекает? В официальном Twitter TON выложили пост с заголовком "Gm NFT Collectors" 🔦 На фоне — привычные уже "подарочные PEPE", НО — в центре стоит худая собачка с сердцем в лапах. 🎁 Учитывая, как TON любит тизерить будущие коллекции — очень возможно, что нас ждёт новая линейка подарков с собаками. А если у них саплай будет 5000 — спрос будет бешеный. 👣 Думаю, будет не лишним сейчас запастись звёздами и сл…
🔥5👍3❤1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wtf_coin_chat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@wtf_coin_chat named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WTF СOIN TON” (@wtf_coin_chat), 889 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wtf_coin_chat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.