🚨 HATI-HATI PENIPU 🚨 👤 Username: @ebokes 🆔 ID: 👤 7301795004 💰 Kerugian: Rp 35000 📝 CH Kronologi: @Spillebokes 📌 Info Payment Penipu: Qriss Korban: @keysjha (7873152921)
❤4
Signed REACT 🤮 = NIPU, CEK BIO

Channel
@wstoretnipuu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003611089172 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wstoretnipuu |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 21 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wstoretnipuu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 10 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 11 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 HATI-HATI PENIPU 🚨 👤 Username: @ebokes 🆔 ID: 👤 7301795004 💰 Kerugian: Rp 35000 📝 CH Kronologi: @Spillebokes 📌 Info Payment Penipu: Qriss Korban: @keysjha (7873152921)
❤4
Signed REACT 🤮 = NIPU, CEK BIO
Format laporan penipu Username pelaku : @lketit Username korban : @Sorbyet Id cnit pelaku : 8778076047 Channel atau contact lain yang dimiliki pelaku : @tokojos, @wstoret, @rnkpublik (dengan nama toko yang disebutkan "Store Kachef") Kronologi : awalnya nyari nokos pink di basewib terus dia wtb in kan, aku hit dia karena dia yang ngepm pertama dan aku anggap kayak udah effort war mf nih sayang kalau gak dihit, terus …
❤3
Signed REACT 🤮 = NIPU, CEK BIO
Barusan aku jadi korban diaa, my badd karena tadi ga search dulu
Signed REACT 🤮 = NIPU, CEK BIO
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
Mau laporan, kalau username dan id proof dari https://t.me/bantaipenip/20652 sudah ganti. new id penipu: @lvenuI new numeric id si penipu: 6038669192 new id ch: @tokobes
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
format lapor id penipu : @zlobang id korban : @wtbhollic id ch (kalau ada) : @tokopes numeric id si penipu : - kronologi : aku need noktel di base wtb, terus aku hit dia lah karena rnk dia meyakinkan, sengaja ga rekber karena dikejar kejar buyer, awalnya pas ku hit fsr, tiba’ dia off gitu. hati hati dia masih berkeliaran di @basewtb
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
id penipu : @oftran id korban : @nrope id ch (kalau ada) : @wstorei @tokopic numeric id si penipu : gatau kronologi : jam 1.30 gua ada send wtb nokwa garansi, terus dia dateng nge pm ke rc gua, dia bilang bisa rekber tapi guanya karena lagi bu jadinya gausah. gua bener bener butuh itu nomor banget, tapi sampe sekarang masi belum ada tindakan yang gatau gua dia kemana. payment pake qriss yang biasa, dan ch dia mendada…
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
id penipu : @esodol id korban : @cecililia id ch (kalau ada) : @wstorei numeric id si penipu : kronologi : gua pm di lpm kucing "3k dapet netflix brp hari" trus dia ke rc gua dan kasih pl netflix, karna gua butuh akhirnya gua beli sekalian yang 3d1u pl 6k, sesuai yang difoto dia langsung kirim qris dan gua pay, setelah pay otomatis langsung masuk dong dan gua ss bukti tf sesuai yang dia minta ga boleh di crop, pas ud…
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @wstoretnipuu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,315,173 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wstoretnipuu named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“qr store kachef @wstoret @rnkpublik” (@wstoretnipuu), 10 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wstoretnipuu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.