Channel
@wsjndzs2
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,022subscribers
-106 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002583159213 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wsjndzs2 |
| Description | #缅甸 #妙瓦底 #缅北 #木姐 #亚太 #东南亚 #柬埔寨 （东南亚大事件）专注于柬埔寨及东南亚最新动态资讯，大小事件，用于保护海外华人安全和新闻！ 投稿曝光： @aaio88888 商务广告： @aaio88888 声明：本频道谢绝任何政治敏感新闻，新闻仅供参考，无刻意引导~~避免我们的评论区火药味变得更重。本频道鼓励尊重 Hello @Telegram My channel has not violated the rules and policy of using Telegram. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wsjndzs2 |
@wsjndzs2 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 10,022 | -13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 10,035 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 10,053 | +15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 10,038 | -44 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 10,082 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 10,108 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 10,128 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 10,128 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,773 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 93.8% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚新事件-新闻.曝光 📢 东南亚DJ俱乐部 📢 【柬埔寨】新闻吃瓜 📢 东南亚时报|柬埔寨大事件|爆料|吃瓜 📢 东南亚曝光新闻 📢 缅甸缅北吃瓜新闻曝光 📢 东南亚悬赏曝光 📢 东南亚吃瓜悬赏令 📢 🍉 全球吃瓜 📢 缅甸大事件新闻 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
Signed SOSO搜搜
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 黑叔
#紧急求助：缅甸诈骗园区仍在扩张！ 据卫星图像及相关区域分析，过去六个月内，缅甸超过20个疑似诈骗园区被新建或大规模扩建。其中一个地点据称在今年1月至4月期间新增约24栋建筑。 这些园区的扩张引发了对人口贩运、非法拘禁、强迫劳动和网络诈骗的严重担忧。 同时，有严重指控称，DKBA 和 KNA 的部分势力可能为当地诈骗活动提供支持或从中获利。这些指控应立即得到独立调查和核实。 据报道，一些与中国有关的犯罪团伙仍在这些地区进行诈骗活动，而部分人员仍被困并遭受剥削。 如果相关地点和被困人员的情况已经被掌握，为什么他们还没有得到及时救援？ 紧急呼吁： • 立即查明并救出所有被困人员； • 调查相关诈骗园区及其背后的人员和势力； • 调查涉及 DKBA、KNA、人口贩运、强迫劳动和非法拘禁的指控。 请立即转发，让更多人关注这些被困人员。他们是真实的人，有家人在等待他们回家。他们需要的是救援，而不是沉默。请立即采取行动，救出…
❤1
Signed 黑叔
关于一些曝光内容帖子说明：有人问有为什么没有证据就发？ 这里我说明下：这就好比如国内的一些资金盘，警察明明知道是资金盘，但是人家没跑路，你收割你，你让警察怎么去抓？等真的跑路了，人和钱都被转移到海外去了。这时候你再去抓有什么意义？ 其次就像很多人被绑架了，然后来曝光，这种大家说绑匪会给受害人留下证据吗？ 在一个黑公司打人，难道黑公司打人之前还能让你先拿手机录下来保存下来？？这种案例太多了。所以说东南亚这种地方很多时候你是讲不了一点道理的。 当然了 造谣的也特别多 ~~~ 看帖子你可以当看乐子~~ 发不发在于我 信不信在于你 很多内容发出来只是让大家有个警惕性~~ 避免悲剧发生~~ 看人不能看表面~~ 很多绑匪当你看到他被捕的时候才知道这人是绑匪~~~ 表面看着人畜无害~实则一肚子墨水 下课❗️❗️❗️ 关注大事件频道➡️@wsjndzs2 投稿：@aaio88888
❤1
Signed 黑叔
这群团伙直接把大事件里面的广告直接给干了一遍。挨个挨个搞😂 上次是直接充值50万u去平台搞，这次学精了。他们那个下重注基本上100%包中了，估计真的是技术缺钱了。 下注细节图发评论区了： 👉查看 关注大事件频道➡️@wsjndzs2 投稿：@aaio88888
❤1
Signed 黑叔
#缅甸资讯：景栋打击网络诈骗团伙，抓获156人并缴获大量作案工具 CNA2026年8月7日报道：据了解，缅甸掸邦（东部）景栋镇区一处非法电信网络诈骗及赌博窝点遭安全联合部队突击搜查，抓获包括多数外国人在内的156人。 报道称，该窝点位于果卡（Kat Hpa）村行政村瑙雷（Nawng Len）村附近的某一园区内，由6栋建筑组成。根据热心民众提供的线索，当局于8月7日上午前往进行了突击检查。 在突击搜查行动中，共抓获156人，其中中国籍144人、老挝籍1人、缅甸籍11人。同时，还缴获了大量作案工具，包括658部手机、134台一体机电脑、28台笔记本电脑以及13台“星链”（Starlink）卫星互联网设备等。 相关部门表示，对被捕人员的审讯工作结束后将依法予以追责，缴获的物品也将按照相关程序进行后续处理。 关注大事件频道➡️@wsjndzs2 投稿：@aaio88888
❤2
Signed 黑叔
#最新消息：西港欧巴商务套餐餐厅被围了，具体行动暂未清楚。 关注大事件频道➡️@wsjndzs2 投稿：@aaio88888
❤1
Signed 黑叔
#泰国资讯 泰国全境突袭三层电诈窝点，71人落网其中52名中国籍 泰国特别调查局（DSI）同步对3处隐蔽话务中心开展抓捕行动，当场抓获71名涉案人员，光是中国公民就多达52人。警方现场扣押223台电脑、1001部智能手机全套作案设备。 该团伙主打虚拟货币投资、网络赌博杀猪盘，专门针对中国、俄罗斯、泰国民众实施诈骗，涉案金额折合泰铢超1亿。被捕人员将面临非法务工、网络犯罪、偷渡多项指控，后续符合条件者会移交中方处理。 关注大事件频道➡️@wsjndzs2 投稿：@aaio88888
Signed 黑叔-xk
赌博会资源业务受理范围： ✍️投稿爆料 💬澄清删帖 📊广告付费 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ XK联盟通知频道 https://t.me/hjn999uuqp82 东南亚大事件 @wsjndzs2 西港今日大爆料 @hajqiwu 东南亚爆料大事件 @bhhhs99 今日头条 @ui99uuppuuuuuhlksiiwojjx 头条事件 @KKKHHIU 柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 东南亚每日曝光 @xb88opqu 东南亚华人新闻 @xkoo100 华人今日曝光 @wbd20uyqp ➡️商务合作： @aaio88888 📬内容来自网友投稿，本站不做任何审核，有争议联系客服发布澄清帖！ 友情提示：soso排名都在前
❤1
Signed 黑叔-xk
#群友爆料：这是一名年仅18岁、心狠手辣的小孩，真实姓名李轩，在柬埔寨绰号叫“十七”，四川人。 他流窜于柬埔寨、老挝和缅甸多国，不仅在柬埔寨西港吸毒残害无辜，还转逃老挝，伙同他人绑架勒索自己的兄弟，和另外两名中国同胞强迫至老挝特区内从事诈骗相关工作。 目前，我已从老挝诈骗公司拼命成功逃生，你没有想到吧？并掌握了其当时酒店绑架的完整监控铁证。 现正义发声：李轩目前藏匿在缅甸东部亚太地区将军山一家名叫“山河”的诈骗公司苟且偷生。我已联合多方力量，对其展开实名身份深挖及犯罪证据收集，势必将其绳之以法，移交中国警方。同时提醒广大网友，务必认清其年龄小、不懂事的伪善外表，切防上当受害！ 关注大事件频道➡️@wsjndzs2 投稿：@aaio88888
Signed 黑叔-xk
#柬友投稿：看到贡布省波哥山顶上那么多建筑在外国人撤离后惨遭废弃，真是一幅令人唏嘘的景象。 关注大事件频道➡️@wsjndzs2 投稿：@aaio88888
❤1
Signed 黑叔-xk
#群友爆料：交克新泰昌黑园区，在这种情况下竟然还不解放。交克基本都沦陷了，停水、停电、停网，还要提前搬走。 前面看到温暖发的一篇文章，说新泰昌解放了，但是我们这个好公司还是不肯放人，安排武装力量（DKBA）配上大AK押送我们这些手无寸铁的人，一路送到了这个定位的位置。 如图1所示，关卡向前走30-50米左右，右转的位置。问了好多人才了解到，这个园区叫做“炮弹坑”，之前交克被打击的时候，被炸弹精准炸过的，是一个叫天天不应、叫地地不灵的地方。图2：DKBA总部的位置松西妙村 网络只允许办公，除了办公一律没有网络用，真的把我们不当人。管理还给我们洗脑，说整个交克被扫这里都没事，背后势力雄厚。据说保护伞是一个在前线指挥战斗的高级军官，同时也是盘口的股东之一。 说是人只要到他们这里了，给钱也别想走，生是他们的人，死了也是他们的鬼。 每天18个小时高压做龙国资金盘、军包等等，园区没有一家公司是做外盘的，全是做的龙国盘口。 谁敢提…
🤝1
Signed 黑叔-xk
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wsjndzs2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@wsjndzs2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wsjndzs2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚今日大事件” (@wsjndzs2), 10,022 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wsjndzs2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.