Channel
@xb88opqu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,023subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1004471624283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xb88opqu |
| Description | #缅甸 #妙瓦底 #缅北 #木姐 #亚太 #东南亚 #柬埔寨 （柬埔寨今日曝光）专注于柬埔寨及东南亚最新动态资讯，大小事件，用于保护海外华人安全和新闻！ 投稿曝光： @Oliveira41575 商务广告： @Oliveira41575 导航: https://t.me/hjn999uuqp82 声明：本频道谢绝任何政治敏感新闻，新闻仅供参考，无刻意引导~~避免我们的评论区火药味变得更重。本频道鼓励尊重 Hello @Telegram My channel has not violated |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xb88opqu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 10,023 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 10,022 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 10,021 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 10,021 | first reading |
77 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 77 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 77 (7 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,425 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
涉案5500万美元，印尼破获柬埔寨网赌网络 印尼警方近日捣毁一个国际网络赌博团伙，查明其运营的“Ujangbet”赌博网站服务器位于柬埔寨。 警方在雅加达和棉兰等地展开行动，抓捕9名嫌疑人，并查扣约100亿印尼盾现金及大量手机、银行卡和其他资产。 警方称，该团伙利用手机话费作为赌博充值手段，玩家将话费转入指定号码后，由柬埔寨的管理员统一管理，再通过印尼当地话费代理商低价出售，将赌博资金转换成现金。 印尼警方与金融交易分析中心调查发现，2025年4月至2026年4月间，相关交易金额超过8900亿印尼盾（约5500万美元）。目前警方仍在追查柬埔寨方面的涉案人员。 关注频道柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 投稿 @Oliveira41575
#抗战胜利81周年 勿忘国耻 铭记胜利，吾辈自强。1945年8月15日，日本宣布无条件投降，已是第81个年头。 一寸山河一寸血，无数先辈以血肉之躯挡住侵略，换来我们如今安稳的生活。 我们回望苦难，不是记住仇恨，而是记住历史教训。 历史不容篡改，英雄不能遗忘。愿山河永固，盛世长存。 关注频道柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 投稿 @Oliveira41575
一波兰籍餐厅老板在高龙岛身亡 警方初步排除刑事案件 昨晚8时，西港警方赶赴高龙市高龙分区，调查一起波兰籍男子死亡案。死者为38岁波兰籍男子MAKSYMOWICZ SZYMON，系当地DOBRO餐厅老板。 据员工透露，死者长期嗜酒。13日晚饮酒后其出现吐血症状，次日病情加重送医，随后被确认死亡。法医及法医警察检查未发现明显创伤，初步判断死因为心肌梗死。目前遗体已暂存至西港省立医院。 醉汉客死他乡～～ 关注频道柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 投稿 @Oliveira41575
加大打击力度！斯里兰卡警方：今年外籍涉诈超千人被抓 斯里兰卡警方发言人伍特勒（F.U. Wootler）8月13日在记者会通报，今年以来警方开展24次专项突击，累计抓获1093名外籍涉案嫌疑人。 对比历年：2024年26起案件抓573名外籍人员；2025年2起案件抓26名。今年前8月抓捕量较2025年全年增约42倍，较2024年全年增约90%，打击量级明显跃升。 目前司法程序已启动，所有涉案外籍人员将依法办理遣返，送回所属国。 关注频道柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 投稿 @Oliveira41575
#群友投稿：中国餐馆遭遇马来西亚槟城24K老大东田黑社会性质团伙打砸抢恶性事件。 我是一名在马来西亚提供当地就业服务机会的发展者，也是一名中国餐饮创业者。 于2026年7月31日21点45分，有一团伙组织——槟城24K东田黑社会性质团伙，闯入我的店铺进行打砸抢，采取极其恶劣的暴力手段，将我店铺员工殴打至伤。当时我们一心求安稳，抱着“多一事不如少一事”的心态，没有选择报警。可退让换不来安宁。 该团伙黑社会性质组织于2026年8月11日晚上19点左右，团伙成员四十多人公然闯入我店铺内，再次实施打砸抢恶性事件。进场第一时间，他们破坏闭路监控，意图销毁现场第一时间的视频证据，并实施更加极其暴力的手段殴打店内工作人员，导致厨师被打成重伤，目前正在抢救室治疗，至今仍在医院昏迷不醒；其他店内员工也仍在医院接受伤情治疗。 我们本本分分开店做生意，只想安稳生存、创业发展，却遭遇如此恶性团伙组织的暴力事件。目前，我手中留存有大量现场相关证据…
#老挝资讯：万象警方突袭“雅典饭店” 捣毁电诈及毒品窝点 抓获74名嫌疑人 此前文章： t.me/svip/73947 老挝公安部专案组于8月12日，对万象市西科达崩县农萨诺坎村雅典饭店（Athen Hotel，包含两栋建筑）开展突击行动，捣毁一处涉嫌网络犯罪与毒品的犯罪窝点。本次行动共抓获嫌疑人74名，其中：中国籍71人，中国台湾地区2人，越南籍女性1人。 警方现场查获大量用于网络犯罪的台式电脑、笔记本电脑、手机等电子设备，同时起获多种非法DU品、DU品加工调配设备、吸DU工具、被称作Pod K的涉DU电子烟以及压缩大麻等涉案物品。部分毒品经过包装伪装，具有较强迷惑性。 目前，老挝公安部专案组已将全部嫌疑人以及涉案证物带回开展进一步调查。警方表示，将深挖该团伙上下游网络，追查其余涉案人员，依法追究相关人员法律责任。 关注频道柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 投稿 @Oliveira41575
#最新消息：昨天柬埔寨波贝又抓了147人 执法人员发现133名外国人（51名女性），分属三个国籍，包括82名越南籍（26名女性）、18名中国籍（2名女性）和33名泰国籍（16名女性）。此外，还有14名柬埔寨籍（7名女性）。 查获大量涉嫌技术诈骗的物品：207部手机、3台笔记本电脑、31个CPU、97台显示器、313台一体机电脑和8张工作证。 关注频道柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 投稿 @Oliveira41575
#网友反馈：老挝金三角特区的山水酒店现在正在检查 现场又有办公的被抓住了，现在在山水酒店的， 不要去一楼，门口被治安局守着的想出来的人一律检查手机的内容 PS：房间不要放手机电脑！！最近风好大！ 关注频道柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 投稿 @Oliveira41575
#网友反馈：金三角特外一号关口老挝新村附近，刚刚又来检查了，酒店里的狗推没有护照，想跑没跑掉，被老挝警察绑上了扎带。 关注频道柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 投稿 @Oliveira41575
#马来西亚资讯：联手新加坡警方破获跨境绑架勒索团伙 抓获五名中国籍嫌疑人 枪战击毙两名嫌犯 8月8日，马来西亚皇家警察在吉打州亚罗士打开展人质解救突袭行动。8月10日，马来西亚警方召开新闻发布会对外公布完整案情。 此次行动由大马皇家警察刑事调查局联合新加坡警方协同开展，目标是打掉一个专门针对外籍人员的暴力绑架勒索犯罪团伙。 在实施抓捕解救的过程中现场爆发警匪交火，两名持枪嫌疑人被当场击毙，两名被劫持人质顺利获救。 8月8日20时40分，警方D9特别行动小组，对吉打州亚罗士打Taman Amira居民区一处民宅实施突袭攻坚。屋内嫌疑人率先向警方开火，警方实施自卫还击。两名外籍嫌疑人于21时30分被医护人员确认死亡，二人身上未携带任何身份证件。 警方在房屋内解救出两名被囚禁受害者，受害者双眼被蒙、双手被手铐禁锢，身上存在被虐待造成的伤痕。现场缴获贝雷塔半自动手枪（装有5发子弹）、左轮手枪（装有4发子弹）各一把，另有一把长砍…
#斯威士兰资讯：40名中国人因护照被注销滞留 #中方要求直接回国 斯威士兰当地媒体近日报道，40名中国籍人员因出境问题继续被羁押。马恩齐尼地方法院裁定，在相关上诉程序结束或他们被遣返回中国之前，这批人员仍需继续留在拘押状态。 报道称，这40人此前分别在恩圭尼亚（Ngwenya）、姆卢梅尼（Mhlumeni）边境口岸以及锡泰基（Siteki）被抓。案件的关键出现在7月25日。当这批中国人准备从斯威士兰出境时，才发现自己的中国护照已经被中方注销，因此无法按照原计划离境。 报道还称，中国方面要求这批人员直接从斯威士兰返回中国，而他们本人则希望先经莫桑比克或南非离开斯威士兰，再转往其他地区。 由于双方对遣返路线存在分歧，这批人员至今仍未能完成出境。 在最新一次庭审中，部分被羁押人员对长期关押表示不满，并在法庭仍在开庭期间进行抗议。随后，马恩齐尼地方法院首席地方法官David Khumalo裁定，他们必须继续被羁押，直到上诉申请…
#新加坡新闻 中国籍男子因协助19岁女子9天接待70名“客人”在新加坡被判监13个月 一名42岁的中国籍男子因协助一名19岁女子在短短9天内招揽70名嫖客，在新加坡被判处13个月监禁。 据报道，该男子负责帮助安排酒店房间、与客人预约，并在网上发布广告，同时从相关交易中抽取佣金。 警方随后在新加坡实龙岗（Serangoon）一家酒店展开突击行动，捣破相关活动，并逮捕了该男子及4名女子。 此外，该男子还被罚款3000新加坡元。此前法院曾下令禁止他与涉案女子联系，但他仍违反禁令与该女子取得联系，因此保释也被撤销。 9天接待70名客人…… 平均每天超过7人......... 原装进口货 质量有保障 关注频道柬埔寨每日曝光 @xb88opqu 投稿 @Oliveira41575
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @xb88opqu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 307,372 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@xb88opqu named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨每日曝光” (@xb88opqu), 10,023 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xb88opqu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.