4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 18:44
150
+1
16 Aug 2026, 03:09
149
+3
8 Aug 2026, 21:01
146
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:27
146
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 150 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
19 (16 June 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
204
Reactions total
26
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 49s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
142 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
51
35.9%
🔥
37
26.1%
❤
27
19.0%
👏
14
9.86%
custom 5244837092042750681
4
2.82%
custom 5231200819986047254
3
2.11%
⚡
2
1.41%
😁
2
1.41%
custom 5197434882321567830
1
0.704%
custom 5298614648138919107
1
0.704%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤖 Итоги недели: +$138,37
Очередная торговая неделя закрыта в плюс.
Но в этот раз хочу сказать не столько про цифры.
Я всё больше прихожу к простой мысли: заработанные деньги нужно периодически превращать во что-то реальное.
Не просто смотреть, как растёт баланс в терминале и считать будущий сложный процент.
На этой неделе результат — +$138,37.
Часть оставляем работать дальше, часть периодически выводим.
На путе…
🏔 Итоги недели
Эту неделю я практически не подходил к терминалам.
За последние несколько дней успел побывать в Джилы-Су, Домбае, Владикавказе, Пятигорске и Кисловодске. Каждый день новые дороги, красивые виды, прогулки и минимум времени за компьютером.
И знаете что?
🤖 Роботы продолжали работать.
За всю неделю мое участие в торговле было минимальным. Я не сидел перед графиками, не искал точки входа и не переживал…
🏔 Пока я в отпуске, исследую Пятигорск, Кисловодск, Владикавказ и другие красивые места Кавказа…
🤖 …мои роботы продолжают делать свою работу.
Рынок не уходит в отпуск, поэтому алгоритмы торгуют 24/5, пока я наслаждаюсь путешествием.
📊 Итоги недели:
💰 Прибыль: +$136,44
Именно за это я и люблю автоматическую торговлю. Она не требует сидеть у монитора целыми днями, а позволяет уделять время семье, путешествиям и дру…
📊 Итоги недели: +$155,75
Когда публикую результаты, иногда думаю, что кто-то смотрит на них и говорит:
> «Ну и что такое $155?»
А потом я поймал себя на одной мысли.
🤖 Представьте, что каждый торговый робот — это ваш сотрудник.
Вы один раз "наняли" его, а дальше он каждый день выполняет свою работу.
У кого-то команда из 5 сотрудников, у кого-то из 20, у кого-то из 50.
Теперь представим простую модель.
Допусти…
Когда робот оплачивает хотя бы одну вашу ежемесячную подписку — это уже перестает быть "игрой на рынке".
Когда он начинает оплачивать интернет, бензин, ипотеку или очередной отпуск — это уже дополнительный источник дохода.
🔥 Итоги недели: +$38,11.
Небольшой, но очередной кирпичик в построении капитала. Не пытаюсь заработать всё сразу. Я строю систему, которая работает неделю за неделей, месяц за месяцем.
Именно в…
📊 Итоги недели.
Ещё одна неделя позади, а роботы продолжают спокойно делать свою работу. 🤖
За неделю получилось +$297.40, при этом каждая стратегия внесла свой вклад в общий результат.
📈 По стратегиям:
• VIT_N DELTA — +0.78%
• VIT_N SAFE X 029 — +13.12% 🔥
• VIT_N SAFE X 125+ — +1.95%
• VIT_N MF — +2.17%
Мне нравится именно такой подход: не надеяться на один инструмент, а распределять капитал между несколькими стр…
📊 Итоги июня
Месяц закрыт. 👍
Все стратегии отработали в плюс, несмотря на разные рыночные условия. Именно поэтому я постоянно говорю о диверсификации — лучше несколько независимых алгоритмов, чем ставка на что-то одно.
📈 Итоги месяца:
• VIT_N DELTA — +3.9%
• VIT_N SAFE X 029 — +6.51%
• VIT_N SAFE X 125+ — +12.5%
• VIT_N MF — +1.47%
Каждый робот выполняет свою задачу, а вместе они делают торговлю более стабильной.…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wsb_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Трейдинг на роботах | Виталий Непочатов |Доход 10+% в мес.” (@wsb_trade), 150 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wsb_trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.