Channel
@writers_haven
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
81subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002259535242 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @writers_haven |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/writers_haven |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 81 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 82 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 82 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 101 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
106 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 34.9% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 25.5% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 11.3% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 7.55% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 4.72% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 4.72% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 3.77% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.83% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.83% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Моргните глазом и мир, который вы увидите, не существовал, когда вы закрывали его. Поэтому... единственно возможное состояние ума — удивление. Единственно возможное состояние сердца — восторг... Сейчас — есть идеальный момент. Будь счастлив этим Терри Пратчетт. Вор времени
❤4
10 других способов описать «любовь»💗 ~ Восторг ~ Нежность ~ Пыл ~ Поклонение ~ Обожание ~ Привязанность ~ Очарованность ~ Влюблённость ~ Преданность ~ Страсть tags: #Перевод_советов@writers_haven #писаиельство #любовь #чувство
❤7
Я: Я пишу фанфики для удовольствия Также я, когда пишу фик: tags: #Мем@writers_haven || #Перевод@writers_haven #писатель #фикрайтер #фанфик
😁7❤2
Особенно часто плеоназмы встречаются в диалогах: люди в реальной жизни говорят неидеально, повторяются, уточняют, «пересобирают» фразу на ходу и это делает речь живой. Но писателю важно чувствовать грань: если избыточность не работает на атмосферу или характер, она начинает перегружать текст и замедлять чтение. А вы используете плеоназмы (осознанно) или стараетесь их вычищать? tags: #Слово_недели@writers_haven #п…
🔥4❤2
Плеоназм (от др.-греч. πλεονασμός «излишний, излишество») Плеоназм — это избыточность в речи, когда в высказывании дублируется смысл. В отличие от тавтологии слова при этом могут не быть однокоренными. Например: «подняться наверх», «вернуться обратно», «абсолютно полностью уверен». Формально это считается речевой ошибкой, потому что информация повторяется. Но в художественном тексте всё не так однозначно. Плеоназм…
❤4🔥2
Пишите то, что вас радует💜 ~ совет от Кристины Лорен (двух писательниц — Кристины Хоббс и Лорен Биллингс, пишущих под общим именем) Бегите в своем собственном ритме. Не беспокойтесь о том, как быстро пишет кто-то другой, сколько зарабатывает другой автор, сколько у него подписчиков в социальных сетях. Пишите то, что вызывает у вас восторг, и этот восторг проявится на страницах. tags: #Совет_от_автора@writers_haven…
❤2🥰1
Быть хорошим писателем — это 3% таланта, и 97% не отвлекаться на интернет. tags: #Мем@writers_haven || #Перевод@writers_haven #писатель
💯6
Подъехала идея писателям детективно-мистического жанра👀 tags: #Мысли_вслух@writers_haven #Детектив #Улики
👀4
Бонусная информация 📌 Ретардацию легко спутать со слоубёрном, но это совсем не одно и то же. Слоубёрн — это общая структура повествования: медленное, растянутое развитие отношений или сюжета. Это глобальный подход к истории. Ретардация же — локальный приём. Это конкретный момент, когда событие уже вот-вот произойдёт, но автор сознательно его откладывает, усиливая напряжение. При этом общее развитие сюжета или отнош…
❤4🥰1
Ретардация (от лат. retardatio — «замедление») Это художественный приём, при котором автор намеренно замедляет развитие действия перед важным событием. Задача ретардации — усилить ожидание, создать напряжение и дать читателю сильнее почувствовать момент, к которому всё ведёт. Например: герои наконец готовы признаться друг другу, но вместо самого признания происходит важный разговор о прошлом, появляется новая пробл…
❤4🥰1
Мое любимое правило в творчестве — лучше сделать, чем не сделать и я всегда об этом говорю. Поэтому иногда надо быть сильнее своего страха. Да, я напуган, но я не поддамся ему. tags: #Мотивация_недели@writers_haven #писательство #страх
💯6❤1
Две опасности, в писательстве: 1. Кто-то это прочитает 2. Никто это не прочитает tags: #Мем@writers_haven || #Перевод@writers_haven #писатель #фикрайтер #писательство
💯9😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @writers_haven. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Любите ли вы обыгрывать тему судьбы и пророчеств в своих работах?
The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,180,245 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пристанище писателей” (@writers_haven), 81 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writers_haven.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.