#вп

Channel
-- 𝚆𝚁𝙸𝚃𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙲𝙾𝙽𝙵𝙴𝚂𝚂𝙸𝙾𝙽 | 🌂📘
@writers_confession
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002240112678 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @writers_confession |
| Description | ➥ ᴋоɸᴇɯɯᴇн, ᴨоᴄʙящᴇнный ᴛᴇʍᴇ ᴨиᴄᴀᴛᴇᴧьᴄᴛʙᴀ и ᴄцᴇнᴀᴩноᴦо ʍᴀᴄᴛᴇᴩᴄᴛʙᴀ ☆⋆。𖦹°‧★ |
| Created | 25 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/writers_confession |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 9 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 25 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 5
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 90.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2024 to 7 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ ✏️✏️ 🔤🌷🔤🌹🔤🔤🌸 ✅🔤🪷🪷🔤🔤 ✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ ✏️✏️✏️✏️ ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ Здесь Вы можете поделиться любимыми пейрингами и обсудить их! Мы также принимаем тейки о персонажах из модов. ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ ✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ ➖🌟🫀– Satu (any pronouns) Владелец. ➖🌟☕ – Flovey (he/him) админ по всему. ➖🌟🌻 – Mr. smile(he/him) админ по вп. ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ ▫️Анон бот для тейков: @SV_ships_bot ▫️Неанон бот для тейк…
🪭• оу. нас 11. да, жалко конечно что этой цифры мы добивались нереально долго. есть идеи как это отметить?? также вновь напоминаю про существование бота ───────•••─────── #щп
❤🔥2
⪧• Добрый вечер, сегодня поговорим о Духе Моей Общаги. Коротко и ясно: Где конспект? Нет, правда, он мог стать отправной точкой большинства серий, но при этом и выполнение пунктов и поиск убийцы происходят за кадром. Почему нам показывают объект, который может и раскрыть лор, и дать толчок сюжетам, и раскрыть персонажей, но его будто намеренно игнорируют? Неанон, ИньЯн ───────•••─────── #тейк 🪭• урааа тейки
❤🔥1👍1
🪭• пишем в бота, прошу вас. пишите прям все что хотите, хоть о своих сюжетах рассказывайте и критикуйте другие сюжеты, расскажите о каких-нибудь писательских советах, книги посоветуйте и все в этом духе будет актив - посоветую пару пособий по сцен мастерству ───────•••─────── #щп
❤🔥1
🪭• тейки тейки, напоминаю. можете писать что угодно. можете попросить помощи, критики, можете сами что-то покритиковать по примеру иньян, можете советами и наблюдениями поделиться ───────•••─────── #щп
❤🔥1
⪧• Хочу побомбить над сценарием Земли Королей. Где все персонажи?? К Зонтику и Феликсу претензий никаких, с ними всё интересно и увлекательно. Но где остальные? Зачем пробрасывать момент с Куромаку, упоминающим «того, кто захочет большего», если об этом в 2х томах больше не слова? Зачем показывать сбежавшего жителя Варуленда Ару, если мы о нём забудем? Это, на мой взгляд, не самый верный подход, учитывая, что комик…
❤🔥2
⪧• напоминаю о боте!! @WriterConfession_bot ───────•••─────── #щп #адмтейк
❤🔥1
⪧• также, помню пару месяцев назад я расписала примерную структуру(тык) для ваших проектов, которая гарантированно удержит внимание вашего читателя/зрителя/игрока если есть вопросы по тому, как ее использовать или нужно пояснение за некоторые пункты, то не бойтесь писать в бота! ───────•••─────── #адмтейк #совет
⪧• раз я сделала это кф то наконец можно побомбить, ураа как мне надоели сценаристы которые идут в проекты и в как опыт в работе говорят "ну у меня два с половиной перса есть" и все, то есть они даже не ролили. божееее, у большинства из них наработки сюдета так трудно читаются. да, идея может быть классная но подобным ребятам стоило бы потренироваться писать тексты ───────•••─────── #адмтейк #щп????
❤🔥1
❀••► Хэштеги ───────•••─────── #тейк #адмтейк - все ясно понятно ❯ #совет - советы по написанию чего-либо ❯ #поиск - также очевидно ❯ #свойпроект - ставиться когда вы делитесь своим творчеством ❯ #мнение - разбор произведения или просто бомбеж ❯ #вп, #щп - тоже все очевидно ───────•••───────
⪧• ⋄ Trigger/Content Warning ───────•••─────── Блюр на текст/изображения ставится в соответствии со списком ниже самими админами, но вы можете также блюрить тейки из собственных соображений. Список тв/кв: ❯ Гомо/Гетеро/Трансфобия (именно высказывания против, на пэйринги и тейки затрагивающие лгбтк+ тему не распространяется) ❯ Политика(Русо/Укрфобия в частности) ❯ Жёсткие высказывания в сторону чего-либо проекта/мнен…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @writers_confession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 988,629 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@writers_confession named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“-- 𝚆𝚁𝙸𝚃𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙲𝙾𝙽𝙵𝙴𝚂𝚂𝙸𝙾𝙽 | 🌂📘” (@writers_confession), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writers_confession.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.