Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[ ПЕРЕЕЗД ] 🪶📜 writer safe-space!

@writerconf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

135subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793898398
TypeChannel
Username@writerconf
Descriptionart cr for all infos: neljinn on twt
Created8 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/writerconf

Growth

1357 Aug 2026, 20:03 — 135 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:00 — 135 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:039 Aug 2026, 00:00
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:00135no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:03135first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 19 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
207
Videos
4
Links
204

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

178 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6637.1%
💘3016.9%
💋2916.3%
custom 52356728644886959732111.8%
🕊1810.1%
🥰52.81%
🦄42.25%
🍓21.12%
👌21.12%
🤷10.562%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2024 to 26 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Feb 2024, 11:19 UTC775 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🌷 #оффтоп ● @writer_spbot @anwriter_spbot 🖇🖇💜 🫧 переезжаем на новый канал, юз тот же — @writer_sp этот не удаляю, остаётся как архив 🌟

💋52🕊1

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

26 Feb 2024, 08:20 UTC781 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🫧 с добрым утром, коллеги 🌟 опросы остановлены, будет осуществлён переезд на новый канал. по советам из комментариев, за которые я очень благодарю, оформим небольшой поиск администрации. на количество тейков с творчеством в день будет поставлено небольшое ограничение. ухожу переоформлять юз и немного переписывать телеграфы с инфо-постами, спасибо всем голосовавшим

💘154🕊2🍓1💋1

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

25 Feb 2024, 12:51 UTC611 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🫧 забыло уточнить, что голосования длятся до конца дня

💘9custom 52356728644886959734👌21

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

25 Feb 2024, 12:37 UTC562 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

🫧 что делаем? опрос 2

  1. ограничение на количество тейков с творчеством за день42%
  2. ограничение на количество дней в неделе, в которые выкладывается творчество23%
  3. без ограничений34%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

25 Feb 2024, 12:36 UTC517 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

🫧 что делаем? опрос 1

  1. переезжаем на новый канал68%
  2. пытаемся искать активную аудиторию на этом31%
  3. отдаём сейф-спейс, ищем новых владели_цу1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

25 Feb 2024, 12:33 UTC394 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🌷 #творчество ● @writer_spbot @anwriter_spbot 🖇🖇🖇💜 🫧 подводим итоги уже проведённых опросов 🌟 https://t.me/writer_sp/2353 https://t.me/writer_sp/2354 https://t.me/writer_sp/2357 большая часть проголосовавших читает чужие работы только иногда, либо быстро проглядывает, но при этом тег #творчество находится на втором месте по интересам в следующем опросе. сами автор_ки произведений при том не получают должного

7💋2

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

25 Feb 2024, 08:22 UTC234 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🫧 всех с добрым утром 🌟 сегодня буду подводить итоги и делать выводы, но ещё пару часов можете голосовать в опросах, если не видели

7💋1

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

24 Feb 2024, 08:25 UTC249 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🫧 на этом вопросы кончились. длятся опросы весь день, в течение этого времени иногда буду напоминать про их существование

custom 5235672864488695973145

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

24 Feb 2024, 08:23 UTC263 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

🫧 и последний опрос. считаете ли вы, что нужно что-то менять?

  1. да48%
  2. без разницы38%
  3. нет14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💋2

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

24 Feb 2024, 08:21 UTC242 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

🫧 теперь вопрос к тем, кто кидает тейки под тегом творчество, в особенности к тем, кто спрашивает критику или оценку. как часто вы получали желаемый фидбек?

  1. всегда2%
  2. часто7%
  3. иногда55%
  4. никогда36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💋4💘1

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

24 Feb 2024, 08:19 UTC213 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

🫧 устраивает ли вас моя работы как владельцы? по возможности и желанию обоснуйте свою позицию в комментариях или в ботах

  1. да87%
  2. частично13%
  3. нет0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💋2

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

24 Feb 2024, 08:17 UTC197 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

🫧 присутствует ли у вас тоже ощущение искусственности, о котором я писало в первом посте, согласны ли вы с моим ходом мыслей?

  1. да, полностью24%
  2. да, частично53%
  3. нет, не присутствует23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💋1

Signed ︎ ︎🫧 майк-рэй вэйбрайт [🪶📜|⚔🏸🏹|🥔☃️] #майксонкуфан #сашаннарсифан

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @writerconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Feb 2024, 12:37 UTCFinal Results73 voters

🫧 что делаем? опрос 2

  1. ограничение на количество тейков с творчеством за день42%
  2. ограничение на количество дней в неделе, в которые выкладывается творчество23%
  3. без ограничений34%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Feb 2024, 12:36 UTCFinal Results72 voters

🫧 что делаем? опрос 1

  1. переезжаем на новый канал68%
  2. пытаемся искать активную аудиторию на этом31%
  3. отдаём сейф-спейс, ищем новых владели_цу1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Feb 2024, 08:23 UTCFinal Results66 voters

🫧 и последний опрос. считаете ли вы, что нужно что-то менять?

  1. да48%
  2. без разницы38%
  3. нет14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Feb 2024, 08:21 UTCFinal Results42 voters

🫧 теперь вопрос к тем, кто кидает тейки под тегом творчество, в особенности к тем, кто спрашивает критику или оценку. как часто вы получали желаемый фидбек?

  1. всегда2%
  2. часто7%
  3. иногда55%
  4. никогда36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Feb 2024, 08:19 UTCFinal Results69 voters

🫧 устраивает ли вас моя работы как владельцы? по возможности и желанию обоснуйте свою позицию в комментариях или в ботах

  1. да87%
  2. частично13%
  3. нет0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Feb 2024, 08:17 UTCFinal Results62 voters

🫧 присутствует ли у вас тоже ощущение искусственности, о котором я писало в первом посте, согласны ли вы с моим ходом мыслей?

  1. да, полностью24%
  2. да, частично53%
  3. нет, не присутствует23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2024 to 26 February 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[ ПЕРЕЕЗД ] 🪶📜 writer safe-space!” (@writerconf), 135 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writerconf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.