Channel
@writeandpain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
179subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001796446968 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @writeandpain |
| Description | о текстах и боли |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/writeandpain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 179 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 179 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
327 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 28.1% | |
| 🔥 | 60 | 18.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 59 | 18.0% | |
| 🍓 | 31 | 9.48% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 7.03% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 3.98% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 3.06% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 2.14% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 2.14% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.83% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 1.53% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 1.22% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.22% | |
| 🎃 | 2 | 0.612% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.612% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.306% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.306% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2024 to 28 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✏️Вопрос к свободному обсуждению: Как вы считаете, когда начинается та самая химия между игроками, которая способствует лучшей игре? Под химией я здесь не подразумеваю сексуальную. Приветствуется честное субъективное мнение.
❤3🔥1
ТЕМА #93 ПИШУ ПОСТЫ С ПОМОЩЬЮ ИИ — ЖДЕТ ЛИ МЕНЯ ОТДЕЛЬНЫЙ КОТЁЛ В АДУ? Мы уже давно привыкли к наличию помощников в виде различных чатов жипити, и многие уже несколько лет как радостно генерят образы для своих персов, задавая чатам крутые промты. Но давайте поговорим о такой шалости как написание постов с помощью искусственного интеллекта. Делов тут на пять минут: Задал промт, дал образец стилька, накидал вариан…
🔥11👾5❤🔥3
ТЕМА #92 ЛОМКА БЕЗ ИГРЫ В следующий раз, когда будете страдать без соигрока, подумайте вот о чем: «А нужен ли мне посредник, который увидит мою историю не так, как вижу её я?» Я понимаю, что игра — это приключение на двоих, троих, компанию. Это способ показать себя, свои таланты, своих персонажей. Получить поддержку, одобрение, внимание и прочее — все то, чем довольно сложно насытиться. Подумайте, вы пишете, что…
❤10🕊5❤🔥3👍1
Я и кино
The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#КИНО Для тех, кто не в курсе, чистосердечно признаюсь, что я являюсь неудержимо и психологически зависимым киноманом💟 Я подумал, что вас могут заинтересовать мои рекомендации, которые я буду подбирать так, что бы вы почерпнули что-то полезное для создания сюжета или персонажей. Начнем с простого, а там как получится. Специально не буду выставлять сюда картины, над которыми нужно много думать и расстраивать свои и…
❤11❤🔥1
ТЕМА #91 ПОЧЕМУ КРАСИВОЕ ОБЪЯВЛЕНИЕ О СЕБЕ НЕ РАБОТАЕТ (ИЛИ РАБОТАЕТ, НО ОЧЕНЬ РЕДКО) Представьте: вы написали объявление о себе и так, что можно перечитывать его бесконечное количество раз, радуясь огромному количеству загадочности, оборотов, сексуальности и обещаний. Загадочность, обороты, сексуальность — это все хорошо, прекрасно и здорово. Но Начинается жёсткий отсев ещё на этапе чтения. Здесь люди делятся н…
❤🔥14❤5
Почему сейчас 2-ое октября? Кто-нибудь скажет? 😱
😱10🤔4
Захотелось напомнить ещё раз: Развивайте насмотренность😑 Думайте, почему персонаж в одном фильме вас цепляет, а в другом нет (нет, не потому что мордашка у него не ок, хотя и это в современном кино один из решающих факторов) За счёт чего это происходит. Чего нет у того, который вас не зацепил. Какие детали делают его объёмным, а какие, наоборот, стирают индивидуальность. Такие вот «тренировочки» медленно, но верн…
🥰13👍5🍓2❤1
ТЕМА #90 КАК НАУЧИТЬСЯ СТРУКТУРИРОВАТЬ МЫСЛИ Приведу в пример несколько лайфхаков, в этом посте начнем с первого. Пробуйте писать (или хотя бы проговаривать в голове) логлайны для фильмов и книг🎥 Это можно делать где угодно и когда угодно. В целом прикольное упражнение. Логлайн — это короткий пересказ сюжета. Формула логлайна: 💟главный герой + 💟проблема + 💟цель + 💟конфликт Всё это в максимально прозрачных и пон…
❤20❤🔥2👍1
Нашел два теста на словарный запас. Давайте позабавимся: тест номер 1 тест номер 2 У кого какие результаты? Есть среди нас Пушкины?
👏6❤4🍓1
Что для вас главное в чужом посте?
The shares total 350%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🍓1
Ребята, у меня тут паблик про животных моих есть. Там вы найдете большого червяка, трех котов (один лысый) и иногда бывают собаки. Буду рад, если вы и туда загляните ❤️ В комментах можете делиться и своей животинкой тоже — я такое люблю. https://t.me/Python_regius/500?single
❤8🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @writeandpain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я и кино
The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что для вас главное в чужом посте?
The shares total 350%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На данном этапе я считаю:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2024 to 28 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,014,373 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БУКВЫ И МАЗОХИЗМ” (@writeandpain), 179 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writeandpain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.