Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wrestling Pool

Channel

Wrestling Pool

@wrestlingpool

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

583subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001672741238
TypeChannel
Username@wrestlingpool
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wrestlingpool

Growth

583588585.57 August 2026 — 588 subscribers8 August 2026 — 588 subscribers14 August 2026 — 584 subscribers21 August 2026 — 583 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 582–589 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 14:28583-1
14 Aug 2026, 16:13584-4
8 Aug 2026, 03:18588no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:05588first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

322 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17955.6%
🫡5316.5%
❤‍🔥329.94%
🗿247.45%
💔154.66%
🔥103.11%
🐳41.24%
💊41.24%
💯10.311%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Apr 2026, 17:38 UTC≈1,300 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

By now, у меня нет вариантов сколь-либо регулярно поставлять контент так, чтобы это устраивало и меня, и мою аудиторию. А если так, то я предпочту взять паузу, чем делать "ради галочки". Я не хочу гоняться за трендами, делать кликбейтный контент, посты ради постов и вот это вот всё. Я бы мог стримить еженедельники - но меня ничего не цепляет, и это было бы раз в пятилетку, в гордом одиночестве и не особо информатив

41💔1

20 Apr 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,070 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Итак, давайте хотя бы условно раскидаем че да как. 1. Это(пока что) не камбек. Леснар застал меня врасплох, "не вынесла душа поэта", как говорится. У меня была отложка, которая должна была выйти после Ро, где я бы просил вас поделиться своим мнение о уик-энде Мании. Но сейчас, как будто бы, в ней уже не очень много смысла. 2. Проблем с прошлого раза фундаментально не убавилось - зато прибавился порванный мениск и о

32💔3

20 Apr 2026, 12:32 UTC716 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вечером будет пост по ситуации и дальнейшим планам, а пока обсудите Манию в комментах. Очень интересно узнать мнение аудитории.

16

19 Apr 2026, 22:32 UTC761 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Так уходят легенды

28❤‍🔥12💔6

24 Feb 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,740 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Господа, в связи с очень непростой лично-семейно-экономической ситуацией, я вынужден взять паузу от какой-либо регулярной деятельности в инфопространстве. Постинг будет приостановлен на неопределенный(очень надеюсь, что короткий) срок. В планах еще коллаба с Кулманом, но пока на этом всё. Это не рофл, не смехуечек, не попытка забайтить на что-то и не attention seeking, к сожалению. Кто отпишется - не осуждаю. Над

34🫡14💔5💊1🗿1

24 Feb 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,520 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🫡39❤‍🔥1

23 Feb 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,740 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Какой ваш "я знаю, что это правда, но не могу доказать"(Доукс)-момент в рестлинге? Тока давайте в этом посте прям серьезные штуки, а в следующем пойдем по рофлам, ок? UPD: мой пример - Кенни и Баксы выжили Коди из АЕВ после того, как его услуги(он хорошо договаривался со спонсорами и площадками) стали не нужны.

3💯1🔥1

22 Feb 2026, 18:36 UTC≈1,070 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

>существовать в напряженной экономической обстановке >иметь в HoF’е весьма спорного и презираемого многими персонажа >принимать сомнительные кадровые решения >увольнять людей, параллельно кичась тем, какие крутые у вас финансовые показатели >перенести место проведения главного шоу года, руководствуясь исключительно коммерческой составляющей >взвинтить цены на билеты до исторического максимума >«чет билеты хуево прода

16

22 Feb 2026, 17:03 UTC897 viewsread 8 August 2026

Во-первых, сегодня Прощеное Воскресение, поэтому всех прощаю. Во-вторых, сколько же водолеев и рыб в руслинге, жестб

22 Feb 2026, 15:38 UTC847 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wthigsPoll

Вы симпуете по NSW Edition 7 часть

  1. Карина Росси17%
  2. Эбби10%
  3. Элита3%
  4. Литана6%
  5. Валерия Оши3%
  6. Макс Фишер14%
  7. Андрей Щербаков26%
  8. Дизастер6%
  9. Михаил Князев5%
  10. Шаман9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @wrestlingpool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Feb 2026, 15:38 UTCAnonymous Poll146 voters

Вы симпуете по NSW Edition 7 часть

  1. Карина Росси17%
  2. Эбби10%
  3. Элита3%
  4. Литана6%
  5. Валерия Оши3%
  6. Макс Фишер14%
  7. Андрей Щербаков26%
  8. Дизастер6%
  9. Михаил Князев5%
  10. Шаман9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 20 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wrestling Pool” (@wrestlingpool), 583 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wrestlingpool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.