Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wrath of Vehk

Channel

Wrath of Vehk

@wrathofvehk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001488956557
TypeChannel
Username@wrathofvehk
DescriptionRedoran Traditionalist
Created6 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/wrathofvehk

Growth

1431451446 August 2026 — 143 subscribers7 August 2026 — 145 subscribers8 August 2026 — 145 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 143–145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:01145no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:05145+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:38143first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
71
Videos
5
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁6138.9%
❤‍🔥2515.9%
👏2214.0%
🙏1912.1%
😢117.01%
🌚85.10%
🤔85.10%
😱21.27%
👍10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 08:29 UTC53 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @elderscrollzPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

2 May 2026, 05:46 UTC220 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

You've just ordered Pizza Hut and a 2L Mountain Dew. You've loaded up Morrowind on your PC. No school tomorrow. Your parents don't care if you stay up all night long. A perfect spring night. The year is 2026. You are 36 years old.

😁13🙏3❤‍🔥1

29 Apr 2026, 08:49 UTC182 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Did You Know: Lord Cluttermonkey has a full set of Daedric Armor? This includes a pair of Daedric Boots and a Face of God helm, which he unfortunately cannot wear as an Argonian.

😢10

14 Mar 2026, 06:57 UTC445 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Fetchers be like “what’s the move?” n'wah you live in Gnaar Mok, there is no move

❤‍🔥8😁2😢1

28 Dec 2025, 20:27 UTC296 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Shoutout to MORROMINUT, a cute little Morrowind channel. One of the few to do tier lists that aren't slop-tier, pun intended. https://youtube.com/@morrominut

👍1

4 Dec 2025, 18:16 UTC825 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁8🙏1

3 Dec 2025, 13:37 UTC280 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥7🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wrathofvehk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wrath of Vehk” (@wrathofvehk), 145 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wrathofvehk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.