Channel
@wrachgrach
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
964subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001443954558 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wrachgrach |
| Created | 10 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wrachgrach |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 964 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 965 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 969 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 972 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 972 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (18 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 303 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
293 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 221 | 75.4% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 3.75% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 2.73% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 2.05% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.37% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.683% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.683% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы если что, пожалуйста, не думайте, что я сошла с ума и жалуюсь. Мы можем путешествовать и видеть родных. Я прекрасно понимаю своё в этом плане очень привеллигированое положение, многим людям в мире это просто недоступно, и это грустно. Скорее просто небольшое нытье на тему огромного количества бюрократии в этой вашей взрослой жизни 😫
❤8
Читали ли вы детскую книжку про Мимбо-джимбо? Там такой синенький слоник строит что-то из кирпичей, но когда его спрашивают, что он строит, он всегда отвечает «я хотел бы построить… уффф… сложно объяснить». Вот я как мимбо-джимбо с бесконечными шенгенскими визами. Заканчиваю собирать очередную пачку и такая уффффффф. С тех пор как сын переехал к нам, каждые каникулы он с моим мужем летает к своей маме, которая жив…
❤9
Узнавать в честь чего названо что-то известное - это как находить пасхалки и их разгадывать. Я знала, что во Франции есть шоппинг-центр "Галерея Лафайет" (Galeries Lafayette), но не знала, откуда ее название. А тут на днях попался мне на глаза Атлас Американской Революции, и я решила наконец заполнить этот пробел в понимании того, как формировались США. Причем тут французы, спросите вы? Или не спросите, потому что…
❤9
https://youtu.be/0HL6oAQg3K4 Если кому-то интересно, рассказала про Корнуэлл в своем канале)
❤4
Хотела поныть, что после родов и после 30 жизнь превращается в постоянную попытку иметь здоровое тело и хорошую фигуру, а потом поняла, что, ну как бы, природой так и задумано? Не двигаешься? Не развиваешься? Зачем ты нужен эволюции? Увы 😢 Понятно, что с развитием медицины, это стало не настолько радикально, но тем не менее. Поэтому ныть довольно бессмысленно, а заниматься спортом - таки вполне имеет смысл (пишу эт…
❤17
Год назад я имела права, но боялась водить, а вчера я проехала за рулем 500 км от Лондона до места в Корнуэлле, где мы остановились. Не так много поводов для того, чтобы гордиться собой в последнее время, но этим горжусь. Ехали с остановками в Солсбери (1ч 40 мин от нас до него) и на ферме Дартс Фарм (2 часа до нее от Солсбери и еще 2 часа после). Собор в Солсбери сумасшедше красивый, море вчера было на удивление т…
❤20🔥12
В общем, муж угадал, остальные не стали пытаться 🤣 это Осип Мандельштам, очень похоже на Notre Dame по стилю)
❤12
Как вам детское стихотворение? 😅 очень сложные обороты) Угадаете, чьё, если не гуглить? Узнаваемый стиль других стихотворений этого автора) (Особенно 3-ий абзац похож на другие его стихи)
❤7🤯4😁4
https://youtu.be/4g7JnmWNEZs?si=-yxnaeOM-HAI7_c9 решила вести свой канал на ютьюбе на английском если интересно - заходите послушать, подписывайтесь, комментируйте, пожалуйста 🥰
❤11🔥1
Реально как будто реклама кофейни ахаха))
❤46👍5😁2
Если кому-то интересно обсудить политическое будущее Великобритании - вот пост в английском канале) https://t.me/wrachgrach_uk/606
❤3😢1
Как классно изучать разные виды любви - любовь к мужу такая горячая, как огонь, любовь к сыну - такая глубокая, как море, любовь к дочке - такая всеобъемлющая, как воздух, любовь к родителям и другим родным людям и друзьям такая стабильная, как земля. А ещё я поняла, что любовь - это мышца, и что она качается. Становится глубже, даже если если есть микроразрывы, как при прокачке мышц силовыми. Если разрывы сильные…
❤13🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wrachgrach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 85,487 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“wrachgrach” (@wrachgrach), 964 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wrachgrach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.