Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐀υ∂ |𝂅ׄ 𝐖ꪮ𝗎𝗅𝝸๋𝗌 ๋݂𝂅ׄ’’ ⌗𝗔𝗦𝗔𝗣

@wouliscov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004303468070
TypeChannel
Username@wouliscov
Created24 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/wouliscov

Growth

484948.57 August 2026 — 49 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–49 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:1748no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:0448-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:4549first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
484.0%
avg views ÷ 48 subscribers
Avg views / post
232
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
32.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 4 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held4 (24 July 202627 July 2026)
Views total697
Reactions total228
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 3 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51952555729659016433214.0%
custom 52830457052235202372912.7%
custom 52830590496869084472812.3%
custom 52807809474935036332711.8%
custom 5282782114490631118219.21%
custom 5283096720845061695208.77%
custom 5201681913487583557177.46%
custom 5280955336050624726177.46%
custom 5203933885099958975156.58%
custom 5346072907183325093146.14%
custom 526051823238883004683.51%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC131 views49 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52827821144906311189custom 52830590496869084479custom 52016819134875835577custom 52830457052235202375custom 52830967208450616955custom 51952555729659016433custom 52039338850999589753custom 52605182323888300463

27 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC390 views97 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🌟🌟 ๋݂𝂅ׄ’𝐀𝘂‌ׁ𝗱۪𝗂ᴛ𝗂ꪮ𝗻︢︣: 𝘄︩︪ꪮ𝗎𝗅𝝸๋𝗌 🎀🩵 🌟 🌟 « 🐰–· σт? :: 𝗈𝕡𝒆𝐧 » ⭐️ ⓘ 𝗌σ𝗈ᥒ ' ᥒᴊ𝘇 › ѕυ𝖻 ! :: 🪦 🌟🤍 · • ➿· ➿ · ➿ · 🤍

custom 519525557296590164323custom 528304570522352023717custom 528078094749350363315custom 52830967208450616958custom 52039338850999589756custom 52605182323888300465custom 52809553360506247265custom 52830590496869084475

26 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC176 views82 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 528305904968690844714custom 528095533605062472612custom 528078094749350363310custom 52827821144906311188custom 52830457052235202377custom 52830967208450616957custom 51952555729659016436custom 52016819134875835576

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @wouliscov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,198,113 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐀υ∂ |𝂅ׄ 𝐖ꪮ𝗎𝗅𝝸๋𝗌 ๋݂𝂅ׄ’’ ⌗𝗔𝗦𝗔𝗣” (@wouliscov), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wouliscov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.