И вперёд по новой жить... у меня вновь проснулось желание заниматься нарезками с квестов и в целом любовь к ним никуда не пропала, но так как этот канал основан на косплеерской части моей жизни я создала отдельный ТГК, куда буду публиковать всё связанное с квестами, чтобы не засорять этот. Так что оставляю ссылочку: https://t.me/kasq_quest Жду всех желающих наблюдать именно эту часть моей жизни. Пока там ничего тол…

Channel
Мысли старого Лиса 🦊
@worthless_dreams
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
151subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001815754155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @worthless_dreams |
| Created | 5 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/worthless_dreams |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 151 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 152 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 152 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 38.6%
- avg views ÷ 151 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 58.3
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 15.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (3 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 233 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8m 44s
- Average length
- 1m 27s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
80 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5326044950696042137 | 21 | 26.3% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 22.5% | |
| custom 5328273261333584797 | 17 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 18.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 3.75% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 3.75% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.25% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @worthless_dreams. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53260449506960421374❤3custom 53282732613335847973🔥2
Неожиданно и совершенно незапланировано двигаюсь на Аниме пати в Нилу… Все на скорую руку, ибо совсем не думала, что поеду
❤4custom 53260449506960421374custom 53282732613335847974🔥3💘1
Нашла лучшее видео за вчерашний вечер Вот так обороняйся от них, когда у них длиннее 😰
❤2🙈2
Вчера было настолько весело, что поснимать ничего не успела. Так что делаюсь видосом от организаторов 💃
custom 53282732613335847972
В следующей игре: 1) Новый сценарий «Судная ночь» 2) Повышенный уровень страха 3) Сложность 3 из 3, увеличенная длительность игры
🔥2custom 53260449506960421372
Держите обещанный видосик про белочек и чуток нашей прогулки. Приятно вот так порой выбраться на природу и пройтись по красивым местам.
custom 53260449506960421373custom 53282732613335847973❤2
Прогулялась сегодня по одному очень красивому парку. Решила поделиться с вами парой красивых фото оттуда, но самым интересным местом в этом парке оказался особняк, который встретила во время прохождения Городских квестов. Хочется как-нибудь полазить там внутри. Но кроме вайбовых мест в этом парке можно было покормить еще и белочек. Удалось так же снять пару красивых видосиков с ними. Хотите посмотреть? Всего то нужн…
custom 53260449506960421374❤🔥3custom 53282732613335847973
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 0️⃣3️⃣.0️⃣7️⃣.2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣ 🛞 Новый сценарий «КлоунАда» ⛳️ Сложность 2 из 3 ⛽️ Топливосберегающий маршрут❗️ 🤡 Добрые и злые клоуны 🛻 Автоуровень Организаторы: Городские квесты «Паника»
❤3custom 53260449506960421372custom 53282732613335847972🔥1
Посетила вчера Императорский цирк Моретти. Эмоции бомбезные. Очень советую сходить пока они у нас. После представления можно купить билет на экскурсию к хищникам и поближе рассмотреть тигров и Льва.
🔥6❤3🎉3
Сегодня пятница, а это значит... НОВЫЙ ГОРОДСКОЙ КВЕСТ! К сожалению, когда села за монтаж, ничего толком там не смогла выбрать, так что сделала из чего было, но я обещаю, что сегодняшнюю игру постараюсь поснимать сама и может материала будет больше. А пока делюсь кусочком со старых.
custom 53260449506960421372❤1🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @worthless_dreams. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,067,618 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мысли старого Лиса 🦊” (@worthless_dreams), 151 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/worthless_dreams.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.